In re Giaquinto

Decision Date28 January 1916
PartiesIn re GIAQUINTO.
CourtU.S. District Court — Southern District of New York

MAYER District Judge.

Giaquinto is an applicant for naturalization, and on final hearing one of his witnesses did not appear. He desires to substitute a witness, and the question is whether it will be necessary to post the name of the substituted witness for a period of 90 days, or whether said substituted witness may be summoned and examined without the prerequisite of posting.

The applicable sections of the act of June 29, 1906, are as follows:

'The petition shall also be verified by the affidavits of at least two credible witnesses, who are citizens of the United States, and who shall state in their affidavits that they have personally known the applicant to be a resident of the United States for a period of at least five years continuously, and of the state, territory, or district in which the application is made for a period of at least one year immediately preceding the date of the filing of his petition, and that they each have personal knowledge that the petitioner is a person of good moral character, and that he is in every way qualified, in their opinion, to be admitted as a citizen of the United States. ' Section 4, second condition, third paragraph.
'That the clerk of the court shall, immediately after filing the petition, give notice thereof by posting in a public and conspicuous place in his office, or in the building in which his office is situated, under an appropriate heading the name, nativity, and residence of the alien, the date and place of his arrival in the United States, and the date, as nearly as may be, for the final hearing of his petition, and the names of the witnesses whom the applicant expects to summon in his behalf; and the clerk shall, if the applicant requests it, issue a subpoena for the witnesses so named by the said applicant to appear upon the day set for the final hearing, but in case such witnesses can not be produced upon the final hearing other witnesses may be summoned. ' Section 5.

'That petitions for naturalization may be made and filed during term time or vacation of the court and shall be docketed the same day as filled, but final action thereon shall be had only on stated days, to be fixed by rule of the court, and in no case shall final action be had upon a petition until at least ninety days have elapsed after filing and posting the notice of such...

To continue reading

Request your trial
1 cases
  • In re Vasicek
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Eastern District of Missouri
    • 12 d6 Março d6 1921
    ... ... States, 249 F. 470, 161 C.C.A ... [271 F. 328] ... 428) ); ... that legal notice has been given of the date of final hearing ... (United States v. Peterson, 182 F. 289, 104 C.C.A ... 571; In re O'Dea (C.C.) 158 F. 703; United ... States v. Daly, 32 App.D.C. 525; In re Giaquinto ... (D.C.) 230 F. 1004); that the petitioner labors under no ... legal disability in seeking citizenship (In re Rionda ... (D.C.) 164 F. 368; United States v. Cohen, 179 ... F. 834, 103 C.C.A. 28, 29 L.R.A. (N.S.) 829; Mackenzie v ... Hare, 239 U.S. 299, 36 Sup.Ct. 106, 60 L.Ed. 297, Ann ... ...

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT