In re Giaquinto
Decision Date | 28 January 1916 |
Parties | In re GIAQUINTO. |
Court | U.S. District Court — Southern District of New York |
Giaquinto is an applicant for naturalization, and on final hearing one of his witnesses did not appear. He desires to substitute a witness, and the question is whether it will be necessary to post the name of the substituted witness for a period of 90 days, or whether said substituted witness may be summoned and examined without the prerequisite of posting.
The applicable sections of the act of June 29, 1906, are as follows:
'That petitions for naturalization may be made and filed during term time or vacation of the court and shall be docketed the same day as filled, but final action thereon shall be had only on stated days, to be fixed by rule of the court, and in no case shall final action be had upon a petition until at least ninety days have elapsed after filing and posting the notice of such...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
In re Vasicek
... ... States, 249 F. 470, 161 C.C.A ... [271 F. 328] ... 428) ); ... that legal notice has been given of the date of final hearing ... (United States v. Peterson, 182 F. 289, 104 C.C.A ... 571; In re O'Dea (C.C.) 158 F. 703; United ... States v. Daly, 32 App.D.C. 525; In re Giaquinto ... (D.C.) 230 F. 1004); that the petitioner labors under no ... legal disability in seeking citizenship (In re Rionda ... (D.C.) 164 F. 368; United States v. Cohen, 179 ... F. 834, 103 C.C.A. 28, 29 L.R.A. (N.S.) 829; Mackenzie v ... Hare, 239 U.S. 299, 36 Sup.Ct. 106, 60 L.Ed. 297, Ann ... ...