In re Green, s. 15–BG–9

Decision Date30 April 2015
Docket NumberNos. 15–BG–9,15–BG–138.,s. 15–BG–9
Citation114 A.3d 660 (Mem)
PartiesIn re John M. GREEN, Respondent.
CourtD.C. Court of Appeals
ORDER

PER CURIAM

On consideration of the certified orders of the Court of Appeals of Maryland indefinitely suspending respondent from the practice of law in that jurisdiction, see Attorney Grievance Com'n of Maryland v. Green, 441 Md. 351, 107 A.3d 1220 (2015), Attorney Grievance Com'n of Maryland v. Green, 441 Md. 80, 105 A.3d 500 (2014), this court's January 29, 2015, order suspending respondent and directing him to show cause why the functionally equivalent discipline in the form of a suspension for a period of five years or until reinstated to the bar of the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, whichever is first, with his reinstatement conditioned upon a showing of fitness, should not be imposed, this court's February 26, 2015, order consolidating his two pending cases and redirecting respondent to show cause why the functional equivalent reciprocal discipline should not be imposed, and the statements of Bar Counsel, and it appearing that respondent has failed to file either a response to this court's order to show cause or the affidavit as required by D.C. Bar R. XI, § 14(g), it is

ORDERED that John M. Green is hereby indefinitely suspended from the practice of law in the District of Columbia with reinstatement contingent on a showing of fitness. Respondent is eligible to seek reinstatement after a period of five years or after reinstatement to the bar of Maryland, whichever occurs first. Reinstatement is also contingent upon a showing of fitness. See In re Sibley, 990 A.2d 483 (D.C.2010), and (rebuttable presumption of identical reciprocal discipline applies to all cases in which the respondent does not participate); In re Maignan, 988 A.2d 493 (D.C.2010) (the functional equivalent discipline to an indefinite suspension imposed by the state of Maryland with no set time within which to seek reinstatement is an indefinite suspension with a fitness requirement with the right to seek reinstatement in five years or after reinstatement by the state of Maryland). It is

FURTHER ORDERED that for purposes of reinstatement respondent's period of disbarment will not begin to run until such time as he files an affidavit that fully complies with the requirements of D.C. Bar R. XI, § 14(g).

To continue reading

Request your trial
3 cases
  • Moore v. United States
    • United States
    • D.C. Court of Appeals
    • April 30, 2015
  • In re Green
    • United States
    • D.C. Court of Appeals
    • July 29, 2016
    ...Green from the practice of law in the District of Columbia and conditioning reinstatement on a showing of fitness. In re Green, 114 A.3d 660, 660–61 (D.C.2015) (per curiam). Disciplinary Counsel moved to lift the stay in this case and to withdraw its exception to the lack of a fitness requi......
  • In re Green, 14–BG–1166
    • United States
    • D.C. Court of Appeals
    • December 1, 2016
    ...suspended in this jurisdiction as reciprocal discipline with reinstatement contingent on a showing of fitness, see In re Green , 114 A.3d 660 (D.C. 2015), Disciplinary Counsel's letter withdrawing its exceptions in this matter, this court's May 25, 2016, order lifting the stay, this court's......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT