In re Hodges' Estate

Decision Date09 January 1893
Citation28 A. 663,66 Vt. 70
PartiesIn re HODGES' ESTATE.
CourtVermont Supreme Court

Exceptions from Windsor county court; Tyler, Judge.

In the matter of the estate of Edmund Hodges, deceased. Appeal by the estate of Polly Hodges from a decree of the probate court settling the account of Smith Hodges, trustee. There was judgment that nothing was due appellant, and appellant excepts. Reversed.

For former report, see 22 Atl. 725, 63 Vt. 661.

This was an appeal from a decree of the probate court settling the account of Smith Hodges, trustee. Heard at the December term, 1892, Windsor county, upon the report of a commissioner, and exceptions thereto, Tyler, J., presiding. Judgment that the report be accepted, and that nothing is due from the said Smith Hodges, trustee. The estate of Polly Hodges, appellant, excepts. Edmund Hodges died February 22, 1864, leaving a will, of which Smith Hodges was appointed executor by the probate court. March 11, 1867, said executor settled his account in the probate court, and there was found upon such settlement $3,610.65 remaining in his hands. Thereupon he was ordered by decree of said probate court to account to Polly Hodges, widow of the deceased, for the use and income of said $3,610.65 during her lifetime, agreeably to the provisions of the will of the testator. The accounting before this commissioner was between the estate of Polly Hodges and the said Smith Hodges, executor and trustee, it being claimed upon the part of the said Polly Hodges' estate that the said Smith Hodges had not in her lifetime paid over to her the income of said trust fund. Polly Hodges died May 20, 1888, and it appeared that during the greater part of the time between the settlement of his account in the probate court, in 1867, and the date of her death, Smith Hodges had mingled the trust funds with his own estate, and had kept no separate accounts in reference to the same. His claim was that, in supporting Polly Hodges, who was his mother, he had paid over to her a sum in excess of what the income of the fund in his hands would reasonably be. He also claimed several deductions by reason of losses of income, all of which were disallowed by the commissioner, except one. On June 2, 1877, Smith Hodges loaned one Ford $1,000 of money belonging to the trust fund, and $483 of his own money, and took Ford's note, payable to himself personally, for the whole sum, $1,483, and a mortgage of real estate situated in the village of Woodstock to secure said note. At the time Hodges took this mortgage he made reasonable inquiry as to the value of the property mortgaged, and came to the conclusion that it was worth $2,200, and was good security for the sum loaned. Soon after the execution of this mortgage, Ford became insolvent, and Hodges was ultimately obliged to take a deed of the property in payment of the note. This was in 1882, and he held title to the property from then until March, 1884, when he sold it for $1,200. Taking into account the amount which he had expended in connection with the property, and the amount which he had received from the property, there was a net loss of principal, besides a loss of interest from June 2, 1877, to the date of the sale, March 27, 1884, which the commissioner held should be deducted from the income of the trust fund. The commissioner found that Hodges acted with reasonable prudence in negotiating the loan and in caring for and disposing of the property, and that the loss was occasioned mainly or wholly by the depreciation of the value of the mortgaged property, and by the insolvency of the mortgagor.

Norman Paul, for plaintiff.

W. E. Johnson and French & Southgate, for defendant.

THOMPSON, J. It was held in this case, reported in 63 Vt 661, 22 Atl. 725, that, after the ascertainment of the amount of the residuum of the estate of Edmund Hodges, and the decree of the probate court leaving it in the bands of Smith Hodges, the executor, to be applied to the use of the widow, Polly Hodges, in accordance with the provisions of the will, the executor was under the obligations of a trustee as completely as if so named in the will and appointed by the court. On this basis he is to account for the income of the trust fund, to which the widow...

To continue reading

Request your trial
17 cases
  • St. Louis Union Trust Co. v. Toberman
    • United States
    • Missouri Court of Appeals
    • 7 de maio de 1940
    ... ... Restatement of the Law of Trusts, sec. 227, subsec. (1); ... Fox v. Harris, 26 A. L. R. 806, 119 A. 256, 141 Md ... 495; In re Estate of Frederick Buhl (Mich.), 12 A ... L. R. 569, 178 N.W. 651; Citizens National Bank v ... Jefferson, 88 Ky. 651, 11 S.W. 767 (in effect ... Co. (1935), 194 Minn. 113; Walker v. Walker ... (1890), 62 L. T. (N. S.) 449; In re Lalla's ... Estate, 1 N.E.2d 50; In re Hodges (1893), 66 ... Vt. 70; Doud v. Holmes (1875), 63 N.Y. 635; ... Nagle v. Von Rosenberg (1909), 55 Tex. Civ. App ... 354; Mitchell v. Moore ... ...
  • Forbes v. Forbes
    • United States
    • Wyoming Supreme Court
    • 23 de janeiro de 2015
    ...defaulter, as well as to protect the trust fund.”In re Reed's Estate, 37 Wyo. 107, 259 P. 815, 817 (1927) (quoting In re Hodges' Estate, 66 Vt. 70, 28 A. 663, 663–64 (1894) ).[¶ 60] We hold that, in entering into a transaction on behalf of himself and as a trustee, Cam breached his duty of ......
  • Dalliba v. Winschell
    • United States
    • Idaho Supreme Court
    • 16 de agosto de 1905
    ... ... 4 ... Where a receiver has failed to keep correct accounts of the ... business and transactions of the receivership estate, and has ... failed to take vouchers for numerous and large sums of ... expenditure and has made large overcharges and false charges ... for sums ... 1052; Smith on Receivers, 587; In re Sheets ... Lumber Co., 52 La. Ann. 1337, 27 So. 809; Beach on ... Trusts and Trustees, sec. 737; In re Hodges' ... Estate, 66 Vt. 70, 44 Am. St. Rep. 820, 28 A. 663; ... In re Thompson's Estate, 101 Cal. 349, 35 P ... 991.) A receiver cannot recover ... ...
  • Forbes v. Forbes
    • United States
    • Wyoming Supreme Court
    • 12 de maio de 2022
    ...as well as to protect the trust fund. In re Reed's Estate, 37 Wyo. 107, 259 P. 815, 817 (1927) (quoting In re Hodges' Estate, 66 Vt. 70, 28 A. 663, 663-64 Forbes, ¶ 59, 341 P.3d at 1058-59. We also noted in Forbes that "[a] trustee with power to sell trust property is under a duty not to se......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT