In re Hollo
Citation | 206 F. 852 |
Decision Date | 02 June 1913 |
Docket Number | 909. |
Parties | In re HOLLO. |
Court | U.S. District Court — Northern District of Ohio |
H Hughes Johnson, of Cleveland, Ohio, for applicant.
U. G Denman, U.S. Dist. Atty., and Cary Alburn, Asst. U.S. Atty both of Cleveland, Ohio, for the United States.
Edward Hollo, the applicant for naturalization, was born in Hungary, March 17, 1885, and entered the United States on or about the 6th day of October, 1906, being then an alien and a subject of the king of Hungary. On December 10, 1912, he filed his petition for naturalization in this court, and attached to said petition what purported to be a certificate of landing in the following form:
Immigration Service. Serial No. 721,481.
'1404
'Filed December 10, 1912.
'B. C. Miller, Clerk, U.S. District Ct., N.D.O.
'Port of Cleveland, Ohio.
'The immigration records at this port show the following as to the alien named below:
J. A. Fluckey, '(Title) Inspector in Charge.'
Indorsement:
At the final hearing of his petition it appeared in evidence that the applicant deserted the Hungarian army and came to the United States under the name of Alexander Ginzeri, a native of Italy; that he used the passport of said Ginzeri, was employed in the kitchen on the steamship, came as a member of the crew, then he deserted the ship at New York Harbor, and entered this country without inspection.
Section 1 of the Naturalization Act of June 29, 1906 (34 Stat. 596, c. 3592 (U.S. Comp. St. Supp. 1911, p. 124)), provides in part as follows:
...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
In re Vasicek
...... Swelgin (D.C.) 254 F. 884); that he is an alien, and not. theretofore naturalized (In re Buck (D.C.) 204 F. 701); that proper proof had been made concerning his entry in. the United States (In re Kestelman (C.C.) 165 F. 265; In re Liberman (D.C.) 193 F. 301; In re. Hollo (D.C.) 206 F. 852; In re Elliott (D.C.). 263 F. 143; United States v. Ness, 245 U.S. 319, 38. Sup.Ct. 118, 62 L.Ed. 321, ¢=BCH¢=reversing¢=ECH¢= (D.C.) 217. F. 169, and 230 F. 950, 145 C.C.A. 144, Ann. Cas. 1917C, 41;. Ex parte Joseph Eberhardt (D.C.) 270 F. 334); that he has not. been ......
-
Linklater v. Perkins, 6266.
...(D. C.) 233 F. 175; but were questioned and criticized in others, as In re Olsen (D. C.) 18 F. (2d) 425; and wholly rejected In re Hollo (D. C.) 206 F. 852. But no decision has been found where a refusal to issue such a certificate was made the basis of an action for mandamus or other legal......
-
In re Olsen
...citizens thereof (In re Eberhardt D. C. 270 F. 334; U. S. v. Ness, 245 U. S. 319, 38 S. Ct. 118, 62 L. Ed. 321), including seamen; In re Hollo D. C. 206 F. 852; In re Jensen D. C. 11 F.2d 414; In re Connal D. C. 8 F.2d 374). In the last case it was held that a certificate of arrival of an a......
-
In re Scriver
...of the United States of America. Naturalization is solely and entirely a privilege extended through grace to an alien. In re Hollo (D. C.) 206 F. 852, 853, the applicant for naturalization obtained entrance to this country upon the passport of another person, and it was held that he was not......