In re Implementation of Amendment 4, the Voting Restoration Amendment, SC19-1341

CourtUnited States State Supreme Court of Florida
Citation288 So.3d 1070
Docket NumberNo. SC19-1341,SC19-1341
Decision Date16 January 2020

288 So.3d 1070


No. SC19-1341

Supreme Court of Florida.

January 16, 2020

Joseph W. Jacquot, General Counsel, Nicholas A. Primrose, John MacIver, Colleen Ernst, and James Uthmeier, Deputy General Counsel, Joshua E. Pratt, Assistant General Counsel, Executive Office of the Governor, Tallahassee, Florida, for The Honorable Ron DeSantis, Governor of Florida

Theodore Leopold, Diana L. Martin, and Poorad Razavi of Cohen Milstein Sellers & Toll, PLLC, Palm Beach Gardens, Florida; and Cecilia Aguilera and Jon Sherman, Fair Elections Center, Washington, District of Columbia, for Interested Party, Fair Elections Center

Jimmy Midyette, Jacksonville, Florida, Julie A. Ebenstein, Rodkangyil Orion Danjuma, and Jonathan S. Topaz, New York, New York, Daniel B. Tilley, and Anton Marino, American Civil Liberties Union Foundation of Florida, Inc., Miami, Florida; Leah C. Aden and John S. Cusick, NAACP Legal Defense & Educational Fund, Inc., New York, New York; and Sean Morales-Doyle and Eliza Sweren-Becker of Brennan Center for Justice at NYU School of Law, New York, New York, for Interested Parties, Orange County Florida Branch of the NAACP, the NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, the American Civil Liberties Union Foundation of Florida, the American Civil Liberties Union, The Brennan Center for Justice at New York University Law School, the Florida Conference of the NAACP, and League of Women Voters of Florida

Mark R. Schlakman of Florida State University Center for the Advancement of Human Rights, Tallahassee, Florida, for Interested Party, Florida Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers (FACDL)

Daniel Bell, General Counsel, J. Michael Maida, Deputy General Counsel, and W. Jordan Jones, Staff Attorney, House Judiciary Committee, Tallahassee, Florida; and Jonathan L. Williams of Lash & Goldberg LLP, Miami, Florida, for Interested Party, Florida House of Representatives

Adam Richardson, pro se, West Palm Beach, Florida, Interested party

Jeremiah Hawkes, General Counsel, and Ashley Istler, Deputy General Counsel, The Florida Senate, Tallahassee, Florida for Interested Parties, The Florida Senate and Bill Galvano, in his official capacity as President of The Florida Senate Jennifer LaVia and Carla Laroche, pro se, Tallahassee, Florida, Interested parties

Chad W. Dunn of Brazil & Dunn, L.L.P., Miami, Florida; and Danielle Lang, Molly E. Danahy, and Mark P. Gaber of Campaign Legal Center, Washington, District of Columbia for Interested Parties, Bonnie Raysor, Diane Sherrill, and Lee Hoffman

Bradley R. McVay, General Counsel, Ashley E. Davis, Deputy General Counsel, Florida Department of State, Tallahassee, Florida; Mohammad O. Jazil and Gary V. Perko of Hopping Green & Sams, P.A., Tallahassee, Florida; and George N. Meros, Jr., and Tara R. Price of Holland & Knight LLP, Tallahassee, Florida, for Interested Party, the Florida Secretary of State, Laurel M. Lee


288 So.3d 1072

By letter dated August 9, 2019, Governor Ron DeSantis requested the opinion of the justices of this Court as to the interpretation of a portion of the Florida Constitution upon a question affecting his executive powers and duties. We have jurisdiction. See art. IV, § 1(c), Fla. Const.

Specifically, the Governor requests advice regarding the meaning of certain language that was added to article VI, section 4 of the Florida Constitution by the approval on November 6, 2018, of an initiative petition—commonly referred to as "Amendment 4"—that restores the voting rights of certain convicted felons "upon completion of all terms of sentence including parole or probation." Art. VI, § 4(a), Fla. Const. The Governor asks whether the phrase "all terms of sentence" encompasses legal financial obligations (LFOs)—fines, restitution, costs, and fees—ordered by the sentencing court. We answer in the affirmative, concluding that "all terms of sentence" encompasses not just durational periods but also all LFOs imposed in conjunction with an adjudication of guilt.

The Governor's letter in relevant part states:

I request your interpretation of whether "completion of all terms of sentence" encompasses financial obligations, such as fines, fees and restitution ("legal financial obligations" or "LFOs") imposed by the court in the sentencing order.

Prior to Amendment 4's placement on the ballot, this Court was asked to determine whether the amendment met the legal requirements under Florida's Constitution. On March 6, 2017, during a colloquy between the justices and Amendment 4's sponsor, Floridians for a Fair Democracy ("Sponsor"), this Court was assured the Amendment presented a "fair question" and "clear explanation" to voters. Transcript of Oral Argument at 2, Advisory Op. to the Attorney General Re: Voting Restoration Amend. , 215 So. 3d 1202 (Fla. 2017) (Nos. SC16-1785 and SC16-1981). Addressing a
288 So.3d 1073
question posed by Justice Polston as to whether "completion of [all] terms" included "full payment of any fines," the Sponsor responded, "Yes, sir ... All terms means all terms within the four corners." Id. at 4. Justice Lawson similarly asked, "You said that terms of sentence includes fines and costs ... that's the way it's generally pronounced in criminal court, would it also include restitution when it was ordered to the victim as part of the sentence?" Id. at 10. The Sponsor answered, "Yes." Id. Justice Pariente posited the inclusion of fees, fines, and restitution as part of the completion of sentence "would actually help the state because if fines, costs and restitution are a requirement ... for those that want to vote, there's a big motivation to pay unpaid costs, fines and restitution." Id. at 11. Ultimately, the Court found Amendment 4 clearly and unambiguously informed voters the chief purpose of the proposed amendment was to "automatically restore voting rights to felony offenders, except those convicted of murder or felony sexual offenses, upon completion of all terms of their sentence ." Advisory Op. , 215 So. 3d at 1208 (emphasis added).

In alignment with the colloquy with the Florida Supreme Court, after Amendment 4 was approved by voters, the ACLU of Florida, League of Women Voters of Florida, Latino Justice, and the Florida Rights Restoration Coalition delivered a letter to former Secretary of State Ken Detzner regarding implementation of Amendment 4. Exhibit 1, December 13, 2018 Letter. In part, the letter explained,

The phrase "completion of all terms of sentence" includes any period of incarceration, probation, parole and financial obligations imposed as part of an individual's sentence. The financial obligations may include restitution and fines, imposed as part of a sentence or a condition of probation under existing Florida statute. Fees not specifically identified as part of a sentence or a condition of probation are therefore not necessary for ‘completion of sentence’ and thus, do not need to be paid before an individual may register. We urge the Department to take this view in reviewing eligibility of individuals registered to vote as outlined in Chapter 98, Florida Statutes.

Ex. 1, p. 3 (emphasis added).

During the 2019 Legislative Session, legislators in both chambers debated legislative implementation of Amendment 4. Ultimately, both chambers passed CS/SB 7066 and, on June 28, 2019, I signed it into law. See Ch. 2019-162, Laws of Fla. In relevant part, chapter 2019-162, section 25, Laws of Florida, creating section 98.0751, Florida Statutes, provided guidance on restoration of voting rights and determination of ineligibility pursuant to the amendment of Article VI, section 4 of the Florida Constitution. Section 98.0751, Florida Statutes, defines "[c]ompletion of all terms of sentence" as "any portion of a sentence that is contained in the four corners of the sentencing document." § 98.0751(2)(a), Fla. Stat. (2019). The Legislature provided five categories of terms included in the sentencing document: ... (5) full payment of LFOs ordered by the court as part of the sentence. See § 98.0751(2)(a) l.-5., Fla. Stat. (2019).

On June 15, 2019, Luis Mendez filed a complaint in the Northern District of Florida seeking injunctive and declaratory relief and mandamus challenging chapter 2019-162, Laws of Florida. In part, Mendez alleges chapter 2019-162, Laws of Florida, violates Article VI, section 4 of the Florida Constitution because it adds requirements for the restoration of voting rights above what
288 So.3d 1074
was prescribed in the Florida Constitution. Additional complaints were filed by numerous plaintiffs, including organizations referenced above, alleging provisions of chapter 2019-162, Laws of Florida violate the First, Eighth, Fourteenth and Twenty-Fourth Amendments of the United States Constitution. These challenges are only directed at chapter 2019-162, Laws of Florida, and do not question the constitutionality of Article VI, section 4 of the Florida Constitution.

Article IV, section 1(a) of the Florida Constitution prescribes the supreme executive power shall be vested in the Governor, that he "shall take care that the laws be faithfully executed" and "transact all necessary business with the officers of government." Article IV, section 6 of the Florida Constitution places direct administration and

To continue reading

Request your trial
65 cases
  • Jones v. Governor of Fla., No. 20-12003
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (11th Circuit)
    • September 11, 2020
    ...all financial obligations imposed as part of a criminal sentence. Advisory Opinion to the Governor re: Implementation of Amendment 4 , 288 So. 3d 1070, 1084 (Fla. 2020).To vote in Florida, a person must submit a registration form. The form requires registrants to affirm that they are not a ......
  • Royal Palm Vill. Residents, Inc. v. Slider, 21-13789
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (11th Circuit)
    • January 12, 2023
    ...§ 723.068 is "to enforce." As directed by the Florida Supreme Court, see Advisory Opinion to Governor re Implementation of Amendment 4, 288 So. 3d 1070, 1078 (Fla. 2020), we look to dictionaries at the time of enactment to determine the phrase's meaning. When § 723.068 became law in 1984, t......
  • Jones v. Desantis, CASE NO. 4:19cv300-RH/MJF
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 11th Circuit. United States District Courts. 11th Circuit. Northern District of Florida
    • May 24, 2020 a request from the Governor. See Advisory Op. to the Governor Re: Implementation of Amendment 4, the Voting Restoration Amendment , 288 So. 3d 1070 (Fla. 2020) The court said "all terms of sentence including probation and parole," within the meaning of Amendment 4, includes financial obl......
  • Dean Wish, LLC v. Lee Cnty., 2D19-4843
    • United States
    • Court of Appeal of Florida (US)
    • October 6, 2021
    ...we also must not disregard words in a statute. Advisory Op. to Governor re: Implementation of Amend. 4, The Voting Restoration Amend. , 288 So. 3d 1070, 1080 (Fla. 2020) ("[J]ust as we do not ‘add words’ to a constitutional provision, we are similarly ‘not at liberty to ... ignore words tha......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT