IN RE INQUIRY CONCERNING A JUDGE
Decision Date | 22 November 2002 |
Docket Number | No. 139A01-2.,No. 240,240,139A01-2. |
Citation | 584 S.E.2d 260,356 N.C. 389 |
Court | North Carolina Supreme Court |
Parties | In re INQUIRY CONCERNING A JUDGE, No. 240 Gregory R. Hayes, Respondent. |
William N. Farrell, Jr., and James J. Coman, Special Counsel, for the Judicial Standards Commission.
Sigmon, Sigmon, Isenhower & Poovey, by W. Gene Sigmon and Nathaniel J. Poovey, Newton; and Sigmon, Clark, Mackie, Hutton, Hanvey & Ferrell, P.A., by E. Fielding Clark, II, and Forrest A. Ferrell, Hickory, for respondent-appellant.
This proceeding is before the Court upon the recommendation of the Judicial Standards Commission that Gregory R. Hayes (respondent), a judge of the General Court of Justice, District Court Division, Twenty Fifth Judicial District, be removed for willful misconduct in office and for conduct prejudicial to the administration of justice that brings the judicial office into disrepute in violation of Canons 1, 2A, and 3A(3) of the North Carolina Code of Judicial Conduct. By letters dated 18 March 1999, 4 August 1999, and 24 September 1999, the Commission notified respondent that it had ordered a preliminary investigation into matters involving an equitable distribution case, sexual advances toward a deputy clerk of court, and acceptance of gifts and favors from attorneys who appeared before him, to determine whether formal proceedings should be instituted against him. The correspondence informed respondent of the matters to be investigated, that the investigation would remain confidential in accordance with N.C.G.S. § 7A-377 and Commission Rule 4, and that respondent had the right to present for the Commission's consideration any relevant material that he might choose.
More specifically, the alleged matter addressed in the letter dated 18 March 1999 was based upon a complaint filed with the Commission by Morganton, North Carolina, lawyer Larry A. Ballew. Ballew alleged improprieties in respondent's denial of his motion to continue an equitable distribution case (Ross v. Ross, Burke County file number 97 CVD 302) in which Ballew appeared as counsel. Ballew was later interviewed by an SBI agent concerning the matters relative to the Ross complaint. It appears from this interview with Ballew that the focus of the investigation shifted to matters concerning claims by Tanya Lynn Isenhour, a deputy clerk in the Burke County Clerk's Office. Allegations as to respondent's actions toward Isenhour were addressed in the notice letter dated 4 August 1999 and are the subject of the instant proceeding. The allegations made by Ballew concerning the Ross case and the allegations of respondent's acceptance of gifts and favors from attorneys, as contained in the 24 September 1999 notice letter to respondent, were apparently dismissed by the Commission at the preliminary investigation stage, as no such allegations appear in the complaint filed subsequent to the investigation.
Special counsel to the Commission filed a verified complaint against respondent with the Commission on 14 September 2000. Respondent was served with a copy of the notice of complaint and complaint on 20 September 2000.
The complaint alleged in pertinent part the following:
On 6 October 2000, respondent filed a verified answer, response, and defenses to the complaint, which provided in pertinent part as follows:
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Earls v. N.C. Judicial Standards Comm'n
... ... [*] ... ... OSTEEN, JR., District Judge ... Before ... this court is a Motion for Preliminary Injunction, ... with investigating and resolving inquiries concerning the ... conduct of judges and justices in North Carolina. N.C. Gen ... Stat. § ... 69, 81 (2013) ... “The ... Younger inquiry proceeds in two steps.” ... Dawkins , 2023 WL 1069745, at *3 (citing ... Sprint , ... ...
-
Capps v. Southeastern Cable
...should rest upon the use of “ ‘the same tests of truthfulness which you apply in your everyday lives....' ” In re Hayes, 356 N.C. 389, 404–405, 584 S.E.2d 260, 270 (2002) (quoting N.C.P.I.-Civil 101.15 (1994)). Finally, at least in this instance, we are not called upon to make many judgment......
-
Campos–brizuela v. Masonry
...should rest upon the use of “ ‘the same tests of truthfulness which you apply in your everyday lives....' ” In re Hayes, 356 N.C. 389, 404–05, 584 S.E.2d 260, 270 (2002) (quoting N.C.P.I.-Civil 101.15 (1994)). After carefully reviewing the record, we conclude that Plaintiff was, in fact, an......
-
In re Badgett
...N.C. 511, 514, 546 S.E.2d 376, 378 (2001) (citing In re Hardy, 294 N.C. 90, 98, 240 S.E.2d 367, 373 (1978)) cause dismissed, 356 N.C. 389, 584 S.E.2d 260 (2002). Moreover, the Commission's recommendations are not binding on this Court. In re Nowell, 293 N.C. 235, 244, 237 S.E.2d 246, 252 In......