In re J.F., CA2022-06-043

CourtUnited States Court of Appeals (Ohio)
Writing for the CourtPER CURIAM.
Citation2022 Ohio 3390
PartiesIN RE: J.F., et al.
Docket NumberCA2022-06-043,CA2022-06-045
Decision Date26 September 2022

2022-Ohio-3390

IN RE: J.F., et al.

Nos. CA2022-06-043, CA2022-06-045

Court of Appeals of Ohio, Twelfth District, Warren

September 26, 2022


APPEAL FROM WARREN COUNTY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS JUVENILE DIVISION Case Nos. 21-D000001 & 21-D000002

Eric V. Robinson, for appellant.

David P. Fornshell, Warren County Prosecuting Attorney, and Michelle Belknap, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellee.

DECISION

PER CURIAM.

{¶1} This cause came on to be considered upon a notice of appeal filed by appellant, Mother, the transcript of the docket and journal entries, the transcript of proceedings and original papers from the Warren County Court of Common Pleas, Juvenile Division, and upon the brief filed by appellant's counsel.

1

{¶2} Appellant's counsel has filed a brief with this court pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396 (1967), which (1) indicates that a careful review of the record from the proceedings below fails to disclose any errors by the trial court prejudicial to the rights of appellant upon which an assignment of error may be predicated; (2) lists one potential error "that might arguably support the appeal," Anders, at 744, 87 S.Ct. at 1400; (3) requests that this court review the record independently to determine whether the proceedings are free from prejudicial error and without infringement of appellant's constitutional rights; (4) requests permission to withdraw as counsel for appellant on the basis that the appeal is wholly frivolous; and (5) certifies that a copy of both the brief and motion to withdraw have been served upon appellant.

{¶3} Having allowed appellant sufficient time to respond, and no response having been received, we have accordingly examined the record and find no error prejudicial to appellant's rights in the proceedings in the trial court. The motion of counsel for appellant requesting to withdraw as counsel is granted, and this appeal is dismissed for the reason that it is wholly frivolous.

MIKE POWELL, P.J., S POWELL and BYRNE, JJ., concur.

2

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT