In re Janes
Decision Date | 06 December 1904 |
Docket Number | 52. |
Citation | 133 F. 912 |
Parties | In re JANES et al. |
Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Second Circuit |
This cause comes here upon petition to review an order of the District Court, Western District of New York, affirming a ruling of the referee to the effect that the creditors of the bankrupt partnership shall share with the creditors of the individual partners in the estates of such individual partners.The relevant provisions of the bankrupt act are (section 5):
'(g)The court may permit the proof of the claim of the partnership estate against the individual estates, and vice versa, and may marshal the assets of the partnership estate and individual estates so as to prevent preferences and secure the equitable distribution of the property of the several estates.
'(h) In the event of one or more but not all of the members of a partnership being adjudged bankrupt, the partnership property shall not be administered in bankruptcy, unless by consent of the partner or partners not adjudged bankrupt; but such partner or partners not adjudged bankrupt shall settle the partnership business as expeditiously as its nature will permit, and account for the interest of the partner or partners adjudged bankrupt.'
ActJuly 1, 1898, c. 541, 30 Stat. 548 (U.S. Comp. St. 1901, p 3424).
V. H Riordan, for petitioner.
Frank M. Loomis, for trustee.
Before WALLACE, LACOMBE, and TOWNSEND, Circuit Judges.
LACOMBE Circuit Judge(after stating the facts).
The bankrupts were adjudicated such on February 13, 1904, and a trustee appointed, who proceeded to sell all the assets of the copartnership and individual estates.The individual estate of H. S. Janes produced $15.50, the individual estate of Ezra S. Janes produced $6,155.06, and the firm assets sold for $10.Whether the last-named sum was ever...
To continue reading
Request your trialUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete case access with no limitations or restrictions
-
AI-generated case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Comprehensive legal database spanning 100+ countries and all 50 states
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Verified citations and treatment with CERT citator technology

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete case access with no limitations or restrictions
-
AI-generated case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Comprehensive legal database spanning 100+ countries and all 50 states
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Verified citations and treatment with CERT citator technology

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete case access with no limitations or restrictions
-
AI-generated case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Comprehensive legal database spanning 100+ countries and all 50 states
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Verified citations and treatment with CERT citator technology

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete case access with no limitations or restrictions
-
AI-generated case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Comprehensive legal database spanning 100+ countries and all 50 states
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Verified citations and treatment with CERT citator technology

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete case access with no limitations or restrictions
-
AI-generated case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Comprehensive legal database spanning 100+ countries and all 50 states
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Verified citations and treatment with CERT citator technology

Start Your 7-day Trial
-
Rochelle v. U.S.
...Nat. Bank of Phila. v. Ridge Ave. Bank, 240 U.S. 498, 36 S.Ct. 461, 60 L.Ed. 767 (1916). To the same effect, see, E. g., In re Janes, 133 F. 912 (CA2, 1904); In re Knowlton & Co., 202 F. 480, 482 (CA3, 1913); Bank of Reidsville v. Burton, 259 F. 218, 219 (CA4, 1919); Cutler Hardware Co. v. ......
-
FARMERS' & MECHANICS' NAT'L BANK V. RIDGE AVE. BANK
...States in enforcing subsection f. In re Wilcox, 94 F. 84 (1899); In re Mills, 95 F. 269 (1899); In re Daniels, 110 F. 745 (1901); In re Janes, 133 F. 912 (1904), rev'g 128 F. 527; In re Henderson, 142 F. 588 (1906); Euclid National Bank v. Union Trust Co., 149 F. 975 (1906), aff'g In re Hen......
-
Rubenstein v. Lottow
... ... Mass. 227, 103 N.E. 689; Mills ... [220 Mass. 164] ... v. J. H. Fisher & Co., 159 F. 897, 87 C. C. A. 77, 16 L. R ... A. (N. S.) 656; In re Wilcox (D. C.) 94 F. 84; ... Euclid Nat. Bank v. Union Trust & Deposit Co., 149 ... F. 975, 79 C. C. A. 485; In re Janes, 133 F. 912, 67 ... C. C. A. 216; s. c. sub nom. McNabb v. Bank of ... Leroy, 198 U.S. 583, 25 S.Ct. 802, 49 L.Ed. 1173. It was ... stated in argument by counsel for the plaintiff that no ... attempt was made at the trial to go into the question whether ... the effect of the transfer of the ... ...
-
In re Finkelstein
...between individual and firm debts is a matter of substance, which cannot be disregarded. In re Wilcox (D.C.) 94 F. 84; In re Janes, 133 F. 912, 67 C.C.A. 216; In Schall v. Camors, 251 U.S. 239, 40 Sup.Ct. 135, 64 L.Ed. 247; In re Jarmulowski (C.C.A.) 287 Fed 703. There is, of course, no dou......