In re Jessie's Heirs
Decision Date | 26 May 1919 |
Docket Number | 2982. |
Citation | 259 F. 694 |
Parties | In re JESSIE'S HEIRS. |
Court | U.S. District Court — Eastern District of Oklahoma |
[Copyrighted Material Omitted]
Cutlip & Horsley, of Wewoka, Okl., for movant.
Jones & Foster, of Muskogee, Okl., opposed.
J. C Stone, of Muskogee, Okl., and McDougal, Lytle & Allen, of Sapulpa, Okl., amici curiae.
By virtue of Act Cong. June 14, 1918, c. 101, 40 Stat. 606 , proceedings were commenced in the county court of Okfuskee county to have determined the heirs of Harper Jessie, deceased, a full-blood member of the Creek Tribe of Indians. Said act is entitled:
'An act to provide a determination of heirship * * * and conferring jurisdiction upon district courts to partition lands belonging to full-blood heirs'
-- and provides:
'That a determination of the question of fact as to who are the heirs of any deceased citizen allottee of the Five Civilized Tribes of Indians who may die or may have heretofore died, leaving restricted heirs, by the probate court of the state of Oklahoma having jurisdiction to settle the estate of said deceased, conducted in the manner provided by the laws of said state for the determination of heirship in closing up the estates of deceased persons, shall be conclusive on said question: Provided, that an appeal may be taken in the manner and to the court provided by law, in cases of appeal in probate matters generally: Provided further, that where the time limited by the laws of said state for the institution of administration proceedings has elapsed without their institution, as well as in cases where there exists no lawful ground for the institution of administration proceedings in said courts, a petition may be filed therein having for its object a determination of such heirship and the case shall proceed in all respects as if administration proceedings upon other proper grounds had been regularly begun, but this proviso shall not be construed to reopen the question of the determination of an heirship already ascertained by competent legal authority under existing laws.'
Such being removed to this court, on motion to remand, it is contended that it is properly here under section 28 of the Judicial Code (Act March 3, 1911, c. 231, 36 Stat. 1094 (Comp. St. Sec. 1010)), which provides:
'Any suit of a civil nature, at law or in equity, arising under the Constitution or laws of the United States, or treaties made, or which shall be made, under their authority, of which the District Courts of the United States are given original jurisdiction by this title, which may now be pending or which may hereafter be brought in any state court may be removed by the defendant or defendants therein to the District Court of the United States for the proper district.'
The Seventh Legislature of Oklahoma passed an act entitled:
'An act to provide for a determination of heirship in all cases of deceased persons; granting the county court original jurisdiction thereof, and providing the procedure therefor'
-- approved April 4, 1919 (chapter 25, Session Laws of Oklahoma 1919), which is in words and figures as follows:
See, also, Session Laws 1919, chapter 145.
Appeals lie to the district court from a judgment, decree, or order of the county court as follows: (1) Granting, or refusing, or revoking letters testamentary or of administration, or of guardianship; (2) admitting, or refusing to admit, a will to probate; (3) against or in favor of the validity of a will or revoking the probate thereof; (4) against or in favor of setting apart property, or making an allowance for a widow or child; (5) against or in favor of directing the partition, sale or conveyance of real property; (6) settling an account of an executor, or administrator or guardian; (7) refusing, allowing or directing the distribution or partition of an estate, or any part thereof or the payment of a debt, claim, legacy or distributive share; or (8) from any other judgment, decree or order of the county court in a probate cause, or of the judge thereof, affecting a substantial right. Section 6501, Rev. L. Okl. 1910.
'Any party aggrieved may appeal as aforesaid, except where the decree or order of which he complains, was rendered or made upon his default. ' Section 6502, Rev. L. Okl. 1910.
...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Homer v. Lester
...competent legal authority prior to the act of June 14, 1918, was the authority lodged in the state and federal district courts. In Re Jessie's Heirs, 259 F. 694, the court cites a number of cases, state and federal, where the state and federal district courts have determined heirships in su......
-
In re Micco's Estate
...the Superintendent of the Five Civilized Tribes, the Commissioner of the Land Office, or the Secretary of the Interior." In re Jessie's Heirs, D.C., 259 F. 694, 704. Cf. Barnett v. Kunkel et al., 9 Cir., 259 F. 394; Marcy v. Board of County Commissioners, 45 Okl. 1, 144 P. 611; Knight et al......
-
Knight v. Carter Oil Co. (In re Fulsom's Estate)
...Colbert, 135 Okla. 218, 275 P. 317. But the exact question here presented does not seem to have been decided. ¶7 In the case of In re Jessie's Heirs, 259 F. 694, we find Judge Williams using this language in discussing these two acts, at page 704:"The Act of Congress of June 14, 1918, relat......
-
Goulis v. Judge of Third District Court of Eastern Middlesex
...1014 in numerous decisions of United States District Courts by way of dictum as conferring jurisdiction upon State magistrates. In re Jessie's Heirs, 259 F. 694. United States v. Rykowski, 267 F. 866. Ex parte Harvell, F. 997. United States v. Borkowski, 268 F. 408. Ex parte Swift, 276 F. 5......