In re Juhnke
Decision Date | 08 March 2002 |
Docket Number | No. 87,900.,87,900. |
Citation | 41 P.3d 855,273 Kan. 162 |
Parties | In the Matter of STANLEY R. JUHNKE, Respondent. |
Court | Kansas Supreme Court |
Alexander M. Walczak, deputy disciplinary administrator, argued the cause and was on the formal complaint for petitioner.
Thomas J. Berscheidt, of Great Bend, argued the cause for respondent and Stanley R. Juhnke, respondent, argued the cause pro se.
This is an original proceeding in discipline filed by the office of the Disciplinary Administrator against Stanley J. Juhnke, of Hutchinson, an attorney admitted to the practice of law in Kansas. The hearing panel concluded that respondent had violated KRPC 5.3(b) ( )(2001 Kan. Ct. R. Annot. 422) and KRPC 5.5(b) ( )(2001 Kan. Ct. R. Annot. 424). Several other alleged rule violations were dismissed. The panel recommended unpublished censure. Respondent has filed no exceptions to the hearing report, requesting only that no greater discipline be imposed.
The panel found and concluded as follows:
FINDINGS OF FACT
. Thereafter, on March 6, 1984, the Kansas Supreme Court accepted Mr. Hyter's voluntary surrender of his license to practice law and entered an order disbarring Mr. Hyter.
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Matter of Stephen J. JONES, 103
...to clients either directly or on the telephone, sign correspondence to them, or contact them either directly or indirectly.” In re Juhnke, 273 Kan. 162, 166, 41 P.3d 855 (2002) (quoting In re Wilkinson, 251 Kan. 546, 553-54, 834 P.2d 1356 [1992] ). The respondent did not follow these restri......
-
In re Swisher
...ex rel. v. Perkins, 138 Kan. 899, 907-08, 28 P.2d 765 (1934) (quoting Eley v. Miller, 7 Ind.App. 529, 34 N.E. 836).'" In re Juhnke, 273 Kan. 162, 166, 41 P.3d 855 (2002). As the hearing panel noted, in the specific area of bankruptcy law, providing advice and counsel on "the relative advant......
-
In re Wiles
...or on the telephone, sign correspondence to them, or contact them either directly or indirectly." (Emphasis added.) In re Juhnke, 273 Kan. 162, 166, 41 P.3d 855 (2002) (quoting In re Wilkinson, 251 Kan. 546, 553-54, 834 P.2d 1356 Wiles did not follow these restrictive limitations. He worked......
-
In The Matter Of Stephen J. Jones
...to clients either directly or on the telephone, sign correspondence to them, or contact them either directly or indirectly." In re Juhnke, 273 Kan. 162, 166, 41 P.3d 855 (2002) (quoting In re Wilkinson, 251 Kan. 546, 553-54, 834 P.2d 1356 [1992]). The respondent did not follow these restric......
-
The Fine Art of Self-promotion: a Primer on Modern Lawyer Advertising Under the Kansas Rules of Professional Conduct
...Advisory Opinion Committee has doubled down on this point: When a lawyer has been disbarred, he can no longer practice law. In re Juhnke, 273 Kan. 162, 41 P.3d 855 (2002); In re Lucas, 273 Kan. 1010, 46 P.3d 558 (2002). Where a disbarred lawyer was with a firm, and his name was listed as pa......
-
Deception and Misrepresentation in the Practice of Law
...( 2001). [44] Id. at 822. [45] In re Kellogg, 269 Kan. 143, 4 P.3d 594 (2000). [46] In re Kellogg, 274 Kan. 281, 50 P.3d 57 (2002). [47] 273 Kan. 162, 41 P3d 855 (2002). [48] Id. at 166 (quoting In re Wilkinson, 251 Kan. 546, 553-54, 834 P2d 1356, (1992)). [49] In re Anderson, 278 Kan. 512,......
-
On the Proper State of Things: Multijurisdictional Practice for the Kansas Practitioner
...of suspended lawyer affirmed under false impersonation statute, as a result of writing demand letter on legal stationery); In re Juhnke, 273 Kan. 162, 41 P.3d 855 (2002) (attorney who employed disbarred attorney as a law clerk disciplined for assisting the disbarred attorney in the unauthor......