In re Kavanaugh
| Docket Number | D076500 |
| Decision Date | 25 February 2021 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
9 cases
-
In re Bailey
...Code Regs., tit. 15, §§ 2449.1 , 2449.3 - 2449.7 , 3490 - 3493 (hereafter, the parole regulations).)" ( In re Kavanaugh (2021) 61 Cal.App.5th 320, 334, 275 Cal.Rptr.3d 696, fns. omitted.)In 2017 and 2018, the Board of Parole Hearings (Board) considered petitioner for Proposition 57 parol......
-
People v. Pillsbury
..., 562 U.S. at p. 220, 131 S.Ct. 859, citing Greenholtz , supra , 442 U.S. at p. 16, 99 S.Ct. 2100 ; see also In re Kavanaugh (2021) 61 Cal.App.5th 320, 353, 275 Cal.Rptr.3d 696, citing In re Sturm (1974) 11 Cal.3d 258, 268-270, 113 Cal.Rptr. 361, 521 P.2d 97 [a prisoner is not entitled to p......
-
In re Ernst
...consideration" and did not violate the due process rights of the prisoner in that case; the California Supreme Court denied review in Kavanaugh. We Kavanaugh persuasive to the extent it addressed the same issues raised in this case. We further conclude the superior court erroneously grant......
-
In re Flores (Anthony) on H.C.
...Kavanaugh(2021) 61 Cal.App.5th 320 (Kavanaugh), which had denied a similar claim. Since then, two other appellate courts, also relying on Kavanaugh, have rejected similar due process asserting the right to an in-person hearing. (In re Bailey(2022) 76 Cal.App.5th 837; In re Ernst(May, 5, 202......
Request a trial to view additional results