In re King's Estate
Decision Date | 21 July 1896 |
Parties | IN RE KING'S ESTATE. v. BATES. DOTY |
Court | Michigan Supreme Court |
Error to circuit court, Wayne county; Joseph W. Donovan, Judge.
Rachel L. Doty filed a claim against the estate of Adeline King deceased, for services as executrix, which was contested by George W. Bates; and, being disallowed, the case was appealed to the circuit court, where judgment was rendered against claimant, who again brings error. Reversed.
Ervin Palmer, for appellant.
Otto Kirchner, for appellee.
The appellant was named as executrix of the last will and testament of deceased. The will was offered for, and admitted to, probate. Mrs. Doty qualified as executrix, and gave a bond and entered upon the discharge of her duties as such. An appeal from the probate of the will was taken, and two trials had in the circuit; a judgment denying probate of the will having been reversed by this court, and the case remanded for another trial. The order admitting the will to probate was finally entered by the circuit court on the 19th day of March, 1895. On the 11th day of April, 1895, Mrs. Doty filed a claim for an allowance to her for services as executrix, containing, among other items charges as follows: This claim was disallowed, the case appealed to the circuit court, and the cause was tried before Hon. J. W. Donovan, circuit judge, with a jury. Before the jury was impaneled, counsel for the appellant objected to the impaneling of a jury on the ground that it appeared that the claim was for extraordinary services, and that, therefore, the allowance was within the discretion of the probate judge in the first instance, and of the circuit judge on appeal. The case was, however, tried by a jury; but a verdict was directed by the circuit judge in favor of the estate, and subsequently a written finding of facts filed. The claimant, on the trial, offered evidence showing the rendition of the services in question, and some evidence as to value; and the defendant also offered certain oral testimony, which it will not be necessary to advert to, as counsel are now agreed that the case turns upon the construction of a certain written agreement, and upon certain other legal questions which are raised. Mrs. Doty was named as one of the legatees in the will, and it appears that on the 20th of June, 1892, an agreement was made between her and George W. Bates, who is interested in the estate, by which she and others assigned to him an interest in the estate, for a consideration paid to her; and it is contended that, by the terms of this agreement, Mrs. Doty assigned her right to compensation for services to be thereafter performed on behalf of the estate. The agreement is in two parts, and reads as follows:
To continue reading
Request your trial