In re Kinsale
Decision Date | 02 June 2020 |
Docket Number | C/A No. 19-03991-JW |
Citation | 617 B.R. 58 |
Court | U.S. Bankruptcy Court — District of South Carolina |
Parties | IN RE: Jessica E. KINSALE, Debtor(s). |
Jane H. Downey, Moore Taylor Law Firm, P.A., West Columbia, SC, for Debtor(s).
AMENDED ORDER DENYING CONFIRMATION AND MOTION TO MODIFY CHAPTER 13 PLAN1
This matter comes before the Court upon the confirmation of a proposed chapter 13 plan filed on October 11, 2019 ("Proposed Plan") by Jessica E. Kinsale ("Debtor"). An objection to confirmation of the Proposed Plan ("Objection") was filed by Kirk Shawn Kinsale ("Mr. Kinsale") on November 1, 2019. A confirmation hearing was held where the Court indicated that it would deny confirmation of the Proposed Plan. After that indication, Debtor made an oral motion to modify the chapter 13 plan, which the Court took under advisement. This Order memorializes the Court's denial of confirmation and addresses Debtor's motion to modify the chapter 13 plan. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 52, which is made applicable to contested matters by Fed. R. Bankr. P. 7052 and 9014(c), the Court makes the following findings of fact and conclusions of law.2
1. Debtor and Mr. Kinsale were previously married. During the marriage, they operated a day care business, which was registered with the South Carolina Secretary of State as Magnanimous Kids Childcare SVC. LLC ("Original Daycare Business"), located at 10115 Farrow Road in Blythewood, South Carolina.
2. In 2013, divorce proceedings were commenced between Debtor and Mr. Kinsale, and on June 30, 2015, the state family court entered a final divorce decree ("Divorce Decree"). The Divorce Decree held that both parties owned an equal share of the Original Daycare Business, which had a stipulated value of $493,321.00 based upon a valuation conducted by an independent party, and that the parties were required to immediately list the business for sale with Mr. Kinsale responsible for overseeing the sale. The Divorce Decree provided that Debtor was required "to allow reasonable and timely access to any real estate agent/broker, potential purchaser and to [Mr. Kinsale]." Debtor was also required under the Divorce Decree to "continue to operate the business and keep it as going concern and ... continue to service and pay all debt associated with the business in a timely manner."
3. It appears the Original Daycare Business ceased operations around October of 2017 as a result of a pending sale of real and personal property to Whaley Street Properties, LLC
4. On November 7, 2017, the state family court entered an Order of Contempt, which found that Debtor has failed to pay the property taxes on the Original Daycare Business for 2015 and 2016, resulting in a tax sale of the property. As a result of the tax sale, the Court found the parties had "to accept a ‘fire sale’ offer to purchase the [Original] Daycare ... with a contract sales price of $250,000.00, plus an additional $5,000.00 for the personal property, a sales figures substantially less than the stipulated value of the [Original] Daycare business and assets as set [in the Divorce Decree]." The family court found that while Mr. Kinsale attempted in good faith to sell the Original Daycare, Debtor "had not cooperated in the sale of the property or protected the asset ...."3
5. It appears Debtor opened a new daycare business, named Magnanimous Kids Learning Center ("New Daycare Business"), around October of 2018 at the location of 1215 N. Brickyard Road, Columbia, South Carolina.
6. On July 30, 2019, Debtor filed a petition for relief under chapter 13 of the Bankruptcy Code. Under Question 4 of the petition, Debtor indicated that she has not used any business names or Employer Identification Numbers. Under Question 12 of the petition, Debtor answered no to "Are you a sole proprietor of any full or part-time business?" Under Question 5 of the petition where you live, Debtor answered 1215 N. Brickyard Road, Columbia, South Carolina, the location of the New Daycare Business.
7. On August 9, 2019, Debtor filed her schedules and statements and proposed chapter 13 plan. Relevant items of these documents include:
8. On October 11, 2019, Debtor filed the Proposed Plan. Under the Proposed Plan, Debtor proposes to pay $380 per month for 60 months to the Chapter 13 Trustee to be disbursed to her creditors. In total, Debtor proposes to pay $22,800 to the Trustee over the term of her bankruptcy case.
9. On November 1, 2019, Mr. Kinsale filed the Objection to the confirmation of the Proposed Plan. The Objection alleged that Debtor's plan was not feasible, that the plan was not filed in good faith, that the plan does not provide for full payment of domestic support obligations, and that Debtor is not paying creditors the amounts that would be paid under a chapter 7 liquidation in violation of 11 U.S.C. § 1325(a)(4).6 Among other items, Mr. Kinsale alleged that Debtor has been misreporting assets and expenses from the New Daycare Business and using the present bankruptcy case to hide assets.
10. On November 19, 2019, the Court granted relief from the automatic stay to allow the state family court to issue a final order for matters heard at a hearing held pre-petition on May 16, 2019. Thereafter, the state family court entered a Contempt Order on January 6, 2020. In that order, the family court noted that Debtor's financial disclosure filed in that court "intermingled her personal and business expenses and failed to itemize which of the expenses on her financial declaration were personal and which were business." The family court's order also noted "that based on the testimony of [Debtor at the May 16, 2019 hearing], she lives where she works and, therefore, her rent, utilities and other living expenses are being paid for by the business." The family court also found that Debtor's monthly net income from the New Daycare Business was between $4,000 and $4,500 based upon her financial declarations. Under the order, the family court found Debtor liable to Mr. Kinsale for the lost equity that resulted from the emergency sale of the Original Daycare Business.
11. On May 1, 2020, the parties conducted a deposition of Debtor, the transcript and related exhibits of which were later submitted into evidence in their entirety. The deposition testimony included several relevant items to this matter, including:
To continue reading
Request your trial-
In re Devaughan
...2022. (Claim 11). The order attached to Creditor's proof of claim states Debtor and Creditor appeared in that proceeding and a trial occurred. Id. At the hearing, the Court asked whether any payments were made towards the judgment debt prior to filing, and Debtor's Counsel responded that a ......
-
In re Mangieri
...548 B.R. at 604). 49. In re Brown, 402 B.R. at 401-02 (quoting In re Waldron, 785 F.2d 936, 941 (11th Cir. 1986)). 50. In re Kinsale, 617 B.R. 58, 68 (Bankr. D.S.C. 2020). 51. Debtor stated on his bankruptcy petition and testified at his § 341 meeting that he lived at the Cascada Home. When......