In re Lee

Docket Number11-0732
Decision Date27 September 2013

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
174 cases
3 books & journal articles
  • Conservatorship, Possession, and Access
    • United States
    • Annotated Texas Family Code Title 5. The Parent-Child Relationship and the Suit Affecting the Parent-Child Relationship
    • Invalid date
    ...v. Granville, 530 U.S. 57, 68 (2000). There is a presumption that fit parents act in the best interests of their children. In re Lee, 411 S.W.3d 445 (Tex. 2013) (orig. proceeding). The “best interest” requirement of section 153.002 does not apply to MSAs absent a finding of family Holley v.......
  • Parentage Prenups and Midnups
    • United States
    • Georgia State University College of Law Georgia State Law Reviews No. 31-2, December 2014
    • Invalid date
    ...not be enforced where the laws expressly ban surrogacy pacts. See, e.g., MICH. COMP. LAWS § 722.855 (2011). 149. See, e.g., In re Lee, 411 S.W.3d 445, 463-64, 466 (Tex. 2013) (J. Green, dissenting) (opining that the trial court has discretion not to enforce mediated settlement agreement on ......
  • The Role of a Family Law Attorney in Settlement Negotiations
    • United States
    • ABA General Library Family Law Quarterly No. 53-2, July 2019
    • July 1, 2019
    ...Joan B. Kelly, A Decade of Divorce Mediation Research: Some Answers and Questions , 34 FAM. CT. REV . 373 (1996). 2. See In re Lee, 411 S.W.3d 445 (Tex. 2013). Published in Family Law Quarterly, Volume 53, Numbers 1 & 2, Spring/Summer 2019. © 2020 American Bar Association. Reproduced wi......