In re Liberman

Decision Date31 January 1912
CourtU.S. District Court — Western District of Washington
PartiesIn re LIBERMAN.

John Speed Smith, Chief Naturalization Examiner, for the United States.

HANFORD District Judge.

This applicant, having heretofore filed with the clerk of this court his petition for naturalization, appeared in open court, accompanied by two witnesses, for the purpose of making the proof required to entitle him to complete his naturalization. Counsel for the government interposed an objection, alleging insufficiency of the petition, because there has not been filed a certificate from the Department of Commerce and Labor stating the date, place, and manner of the applicant's arrival in the United States.

It is the opinion of the court that this objection must be sustained, and before the applicant can be admitted to citizenship it will be necessary for him to file a new petition, conforming to the requirements of the naturalization law of 1906. One of the provisions of the fourth section of that statute reads as follows:

'At the time of filing his petition there shall be filed with the clerk of the court a certificate from the Department of Commerce and Labor, if the petitioner arrives in the United States after the passage of this act, stating the date place, and manner of his arrival in the United States, and the declaration of intention of such petitioner, which certificate and declaration shall be attached to and made a part of said petition.' 34 U.S.Stat.pt. 1, p. 597; U.S Comp. St. Supp. 1907, p. 421; U.S. Comp. St. Supp. 1909, p. 479; F.S.A. Supp. 1909, p. 367; Pierce's Fed. Code, Sec. 8295.

It appears by the petition filed by this applicant that his arrival in the United States was subsequent to the passage of this act, and the petition is deficient, because it lacks one of the prescribed essentials of a valid petition. The authority of courts to admit aliens to citizenship is conferred and limited by laws enacted by Congress, and all the provisions of law prescribing the procedure in the exercise of the authority are mandatory. The law requires every applicant for naturalization to file a petition with the clerk of a court authorized to act upon it. Until 90 days after the filing of such petition shall have elapsed, the court has no jurisdiction to admit him to citizenship. It is essential to the validity of a petition that it must be full and complete in the statement of...

To continue reading

Request your trial
2 cases
  • In re Vasicek
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Eastern District of Missouri
    • March 12, 1921
    ...204 F. 701); that proper proof had been made concerning his entry in the United States (In re Kestelman (C.C.) 165 F. 265; In re Liberman (D.C.) 193 F. 301; In Hollo (D.C.) 206 F. 852; In re Elliott (D.C.) 263 F. 143; United States v. Ness, 245 U.S. 319, 38 Sup.Ct. 118, 62 L.Ed. 321, ¢=BCH¢......
  • In re Metallic Specialty Mfg. Co.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Eastern District of Pennsylvania
    • February 2, 1912

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT