In re M. G. Gardner
Decision Date | 11 March 1911 |
Docket Number | 16,883 |
Citation | 84 Kan. 264,113 P. 1054 |
Parties | In re M. G. GARDNER, Petitioner |
Court | Kansas Supreme Court |
Decided January, 1911.
Original proceeding in habeas corpus.
Petitioner discharged.
SYLLABUS BY THE COURT.
CONSTITUTIONAL LAW--Equal Protection of the Law--Transportation of Militia at Reduced Rates. Chapter 198 of the Laws of 1895, providing that the officers and men of the Kansas national guard shall, when in the performance of military duty, be transported on all railroads of the state at the rate of one cent per mile, denies to the railroad companies the equal protection of the laws guaranteed by the fourteenth amendment to the constitution of the United States.
R. W. Blair, H. A. Scandrett, and B. W. Scandrett, for the petitioner.
John S. Dawson, attorney-general, S. N. Hawks, assistant attorney-general, Charles D. Shukers, special assistant attorney-general, E. R. Simon, county attorney, and John Marshall, for the respondent.
Chapter 198 of the Laws of 1895 (Laws 1905, ch. 352, § 1, Gen. Stat. 1909, §§ 7160-7162) provides that whenever it may be necessary for any or all of the officers or men of the Kansas national guard or Kansas reserve militia to travel upon any railroad of the state, under orders from competent authority to perform military duty, the transportation shall be furnished at the rate of one cent per mile for the distance traveled by each person. Orders for transportation issued by the adjutant general must be honored in lieu of fare, and then be presented to the military board, to be audited and paid at the fixed rate. Willful refusal on the part of the agent of a railroad company to observe the terms of the act is punishable by fine. In June, 1909, the petitioner, as agent of the Union Pacific Railroad Company at Topeka, refused a requisition duly made for the transportation of Major Arthur Mills, of the Kansas national guard, at the statutory rate. The petitioner was arrested, convicted and fined, and ordered committed to the jail of Shawnee county until the fine and costs should be paid. After the time for an appeal had expired he instituted this proceeding in habeas corpus to secure his release from custody under a commitment issued upon the judgment. The principal question raised upon the sheriff's return to the writ of habeas corpus is whether the statute denies the railroad company the equal protection of the laws guaranteed by the fourteenth amendment to the constitution of the United States.
In 1883 (Laws 1883, ch. 124, § 1; see Gen. Stat. 1909, § 7198) the legislature fixed three cents per mile as the maximum rate for carrying adult passengers, and this rate has not since been changed by law. In 1907 the board of railroad commissioners issued an order fixing the maximum rate at two cents per mile. The order is still in force, and at all times material to the controversy was being observed by the railroad companies. These measures were adopted pursuant to the power of the state to regulate rates and protect the traveling public from unjust exactions, and they reflect the judgment of the constituted authorities as to what is reasonable for the railroads to charge and for the people to pay. Presumably two cents per mile is a reasonable rate for all adult passengers, or it would not have been promulgated and would not be maintained.
Ordinarily, when the ratemaking power of the state has been exercised and a reasonable maximum fare for people generally has been established, it is not then competent for the legislature to compel the railroad companies to make exceptions in favor of certain individuals. The legislature of the state of Michigan amended the general railroad law of that state so that it required the sale of one-thousand-mile tickets at a reduced rate, required such tickets to be issued on request to the purchaser, his wife and children, and made them valid for two years from the date of purchase. The supreme court of the United States held this law to be in violation of that portion of the constitution of the United States which forbids the taking of property without due process of law and which secures the equal protection of the laws. (Lake Shore &c. Railway Co. v. Smith, 173 U.S. 684, 43 L.Ed. 858, 19 S.Ct. 565.) The views of the court are indicated in the following extracts from the opinion:
This court is not inclined to the view that the power of the legislature is completely exhausted by a maximum-rate regulation, and does not so interpret the decision quoted. But members of the national guard can not be segregated from the body of the state's citizens and made a preferred class, unless they sustain some relation to transportation by rail which, in the nature of things, indicates they should have the benefit of an exceptional rate. Classification, to be valid, must be based upon differences in character, condition or situation which lead to that difference in regulation which the statute undertakes to make. Thus, in the case involving a reduced rate for school children on street cars (Commonwealth v. Interstate &c. Street R'y, 187 Mass. 436, 73 N.E. 530), the considerations which moved the court to sustain the rate were, among others, that pupils go to and from the public schools at hours when other persons make little use of the cars; that they are of such a size and age that they occupy much smaller spaces than other passengers; and that the difference in rate was of so much importance to parents that twice as many pupils would ride at half rate as at full rate, so that...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
State v. Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Company
...requires such discrimination in favor of the organized militia and against all persons who are non-members of that organization. Ex parte Gardner, 113 P. 1054, 33 L.R.A. S.) 956; Railroad v. Smith, 173 U.S. 684; McCully v. Railroad, 212 Mo. 1. (2) Section 8396 is an attempt to exercise the ......
-
State v. Missouri, K. & T. Ry. Co.
...Kansas has no such constitutional provision as we have here under discussion, it was yet held in that state (In re Gardner, 84 Kan. 264, 113 Pac. 1054, 33 L. R. A. [N. S.] 956) that a statute which required railroads to furnish transportation to the officers and men of the Kansas National G......
-
State v. St. Louis S. W. Ry. Co. of Texas
...59 Pac. 1051, 48 L. R. A. 251, 78 Am. St. Rep. 328; McCully v. C., B. & Q. Ry. Co., 212 Mo. 1, 110 S. W. 711; In re Gardner, 84 Kan. 264, 113 Pac. 1054, 33 L. R. A. (N. S.) 956; Wilson v. United Traction Co., 72 App. Div. 233, 76 N. Y. Supp. 203; State v. Union Pac. Ry. Co., 87 Neb. 29, 126......
-
State ex rel. Simpson v. Chi., M. & St. P. Ry. Co.
...in the act under consideration is not unlawful discrimination. The appellant relies with great confidence on In re Gardner, 84 Kan. 264, 113 Pac. 1054,33 L. R. A. (N. S.) 956, holding unconstitutional a statute of like import with our own providing for a one-cent rate for carrying the Natio......