In re McGee
Decision Date | 12 January 2001 |
Docket Number | No. 98-6-5599-JS.,98-6-5599-JS. |
Parties | In re Robert W. McGEE and Janis S. McGee, Debtors. |
Court | U.S. Bankruptcy Court — District of Maryland |
COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED
Anthony J. DiPaula, DiPaula and Sullivan, LLC, Bel Air, Maryland, Mark S. Devan, Covahey and Boozer, P.A., Towson, Maryland, for the claimants.
Lawrence J. Yumkas, Douglas B. Riley, Rosenberg, Proutt, Funk & Greenberg, LLP, Baltimore, Maryland, for the debtors.
Ellen W. Cosby, Baltimore, Maryland, Chapter 13 Trustee.
The debtors, Robert W. McGee and Janis S. McGee, filed the instant Chapter 13 bankruptcy petition on November 4, 1998. On April 1, 1999, the debtors filed objections to the claims of Benfield Electric Co., Inc. ("Benfield") and Ridge Heating. Air Conditioning & Plumbing, Inc. ("Ridge"). For the following reasons, the objection of Janis S. McGee will be sustained, the objection of Robert W. McGee will be overruled and the said claims will be allowed, but only as to Mr. McGee.
On February 16, 1999, Benfield and Ridge filed proofs of claim in the instant Chapter 13 case in the respective amounts of $90,877.65, and $357,816.411, based upon judgments obtained by the claimants against Keystone Homes, Inc., in the Circuit Court for Harford County Carr, J., entered on February 9, 1999. Each proof of claim contained the following attachment:
BASIS FOR CLAIM
The claimants asserted that the debtors' individual liability for the claims against the corporation arose under the Maryland Construction Trust Statute, Sections 9-201 through 9-204 of the Real Property Article of the Maryland Annotated Code.
In their objections, the debtors denied liability to the claimants under the Maryland Construction Trust Statute, denied that they had violated the statute and denied that they or the corporation had retained draws earmarked for the claimants. Mr. McGee was president and the principal corporate officer of Keystone Homes, Inc., but there has been no showing that Mrs. McGee was an "officer, director, or managing agent" of any of the corporations alleged to have defaulted on payments to the claimants.
The Maryland Construction Trust Statute creates a statutory trust relationship between a contractor who has been paid by an owner and a subcontractor for whose work an owner has paid the contractor. Upon receiving payment from the owner, the contractor holds the funds in trust for the benefit of the subcontractor who performed work or the suppliers who provided materials for the project. The statute provides:
Md.Code Ann., Real Prop. §§ 9-201 to 9-204. Section 9-101 is the definitional section of the Maryland Mechanic's Lien Law, which provides as follows:
§ 9-101 Definitions.
Md.Code Ann., Real Prop. § 9-101.
The statute is applicable to the instant case because it applies to buildings that are subject to the Maryland mechanics' lien statute, Md.Code Ann., Real Prop. § 9-101, et. seq., as were the buildings in this case, and the debtors' corporation, through its Subchapter S subsidiaries, was the owner of the properties as well as the contractor engaged in the construction of the buildings. Md.Code Ann., Real Prop. § 9-204(a).
Mr. McGee set up Subchapter S corporations for the various projects to purchase and own the land that Keystone developed. Then Keystone borrowed money to purchase the land in the name of the Subchapter S corporations and to develop the land. The loans were paid directly to Keystone, not to the individual Subchapter S owners. The statute creates a trust when the money is paid to the contractor by the owner for payment to subcontractors and materialmen. The debtors argued that the statute is not applicable because the debtors' corporations were both owners and contractors, and that by reason of their identity, Ridge and Benfield may not invoke the statute.
To continue reading
Request your trial