In re Metropolitan Hosp.
Decision Date | 23 August 1991 |
Docket Number | Bankruptcy No. 89-12542F.,Civ. A. No. 90-1990 |
Citation | 131 BR 283 |
Parties | In re METROPOLITAN HOSPITAL, Debtor. |
Court | U.S. District Court — Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED
Robert H. Levin, Adelman Lavine Gold & Levin, Philadelphia, Pa., for debtor.
The Official Bondholders Creditor's Committee and the Indenture Trustee appeal from the bankruptcy court's order dated February 14, 1990. The order, which granted relief from the automatic stay, permitted the Secretary of Health and Human Services to retain, postpetition, certain payments due for prepetition medicare services.1
The following facts, as stipulated to by the parties, were summarized by the bankruptcy court:
In re Metropolitan Hospital, 110 B.R. 731, 732-34 (Bankr.E.D.Pa.1990).
The Bondholders Committee and the Indenture Trustee contend that their security interests in the payments owed Metropolitan —$361,055 for the malpractice settlement and $112,898.63 for medicare underpayments —are senior to any setoff right of the Secretary. Indenture Trustee's brief at 13.8
It is well known that the filing of a Chapter 11 petition imposes an automatic stay. 11 U.S.C. § 362(a). University Medical Center v. Sullivan, 122 B.R. 919, 925 (E.D.Pa.1990), clarified on denial of reconsideration, 125 B.R. 121 (E.D.Pa.1991). However, a creditor that obtains relief from the stay may set off a prepetition debt owed by the debtor against a prepetition debt owed by the creditor. 11 U.S.C. § 553(a).9 See University Medical Center, 122 B.R. at 925.
Setoff, as a federal bankruptcy law concept, applies when a debtor and a creditor have mutual prepetition claims against one another. This equitable doctrine "allows parties that owe mutual debts to state the accounts between them, subtract one from the other and pay only the balance." Matter of Bevill, Bresler & Shulman Asset Mgmt. Corp., 896 F.2d 54, 57 (3d Cir. 1990). In re Aspen Data Graphics, Inc., 109 B.R. 677, 683 (Bankr.E.D.Pa.1990).
Here, the bankruptcy court concluded that although "a final determination of underpayment was made postpetition, the debtor's claim against the Secretary arose prepetition and is property of the estate under 11 U.S.C. § 541(a)." Metropolitan, 110 B.R. at 737.
The Bankruptcy Code defines "claim" as the "right to payment, whether or not such right is reduced to judgment, liquidated, unliquidated, fixed, contingent, matured, unmatured, disputed, undisputed, legal, equitable, secured, or unsecured." 11 U.S.C. § 101(5)(A). See, e.g., In re High Sierra Transport, Inc., 101 B.R. 432, 436-37 (Bankr.M.D.Pa.1989) ().10 See also In re Dartmouth Nursing Home, Inc., 24 B.R. 256, 264 (Bankr.D.Mass.1982), aff'd, 1985 WL 17642 (D.Mass. Sept. 25, 1985) (...
To continue reading
Request your trial