In Re Michael Ray Mccombs, 06-35891-H4-7.
Decision Date | 17 August 2010 |
Docket Number | No. 06-35891-H4-7.,06-35891-H4-7. |
Citation | 436 B.R. 421 |
Parties | In re Michael Ray McCOMBS, Debtor. |
Court | U.S. Bankruptcy Court — Southern District of Texas |
OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE
COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED.
COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED.
COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED.
Jeffrey A. Shadwick, Andrews Myers Coulter & Hayes, P.C., Houston, TX, for Michael Ray McCombs.
The Court writes this Memorandum Opinion because it concerns an issue important to Chapter 7 trustees; namely, whether they should be denied compensation because efforts reasonably taken to generate cash for payment of unsecured claims eventually failed to produce any funds. Stated differently, should a trustee be totally denied compensation because an objecting creditor, with the benefit of 20-20 hindsight, argues that the trustee's failure to generate funds for unsecured creditors automatically merits a denial of all compensation?
In this particular Chapter 7 case, the Court must decide whether to grant the Trustee's First Application for Interim Compensation in the amount of $57,302.65. The homestead exemption of Michael Ray McCombs (the Debtor) was limited to $125,000.00 by 11 U.S.C. § 522(p). 1 W. Steve Smith, the Chapter 7 trustee (the Trustee), sold the homestead-which was comprised of two tracts (the Homestead)-generating an amount of proceeds significantly greater than $125,000.00. The Trustee now seeks interim compensation, pursuant to Sections 326(a), 330, and 331, for the value of his services relating to the sale of the Homestead.
H.D. Smith Wholesale Drug Company (H.D.S.), a creditor in this case, contends that the Trustee should receive no compensation for his services because, after the Trustee sold the Homestead, this Court issued a judgment in Adversary Proceeding 07-03043 (the Adversary Proceeding) declaring that H.D.S.'s lien on the Homestead is valid and enforceable. 2 The effect of this Court's ruling is that H.D.S.'s lien attached to all of the proceeds from the sale of the Homestead after distribution of the $125,000.00 to the Debtor and payment of all liens superior to H.D.S.'s lien. As a result, H.D.S. asserts that the Homestead was fully encumbered, and because the Trustee's efforts have generated no proceeds to pay unsecured claims, no compensation under Sections 326(a), 330, and 331 should be allowed. It is no surprise that H.D.S. adamantly opposes the Trustee's request, as any compensation paid to him will come from the proceeds to which H.D.S.'s lien has attached. 3
After consideration of the record and arguments of counsel, this Court concludes that the Trustee deserves to be compensated, although not to the extent that he requests. This Opinion explains the Court's reasoning.
The Court makes the following Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 52, as incorporated into Federal Rule of Bankruptcy Procedure 7052, and under Federal Bankruptcy Rule 9014. To the extent that any Finding of Fact is construed to be a Conclusion of Law, it is adopted as such. To the extent that any Conclusion of Law is construed to be a Finding of Fact, it is adopted as such. The Court reserves the right to make any additional Findings and Conclusions as may be necessary or as requested by any party.
3. On June 29, 2006, H.D.S. abstracted its judgment, and on July 7, 2006, recorded its judgment lien in the Official Public Records of Real Property of Harris County, Texas. [Adv. No. 07-03043, Adv. Doc. No. 72, p. 3, ¶ 5].
declaratory judgment from this Court that its judgment lien of 8,016.46 is valid so that its lien would attach to the entire 8,849.03, thereby requiring the Trustee to distribute all of these funds to H.D.S. The Trustee filed an answer to H.D.S.'s complaint on March 1, 2007. [Adv. No. 07-03043, Adv. Doc. No. 9].
To continue reading
Request your trial-
In re First State Bancorporation
...trustee owes a fiduciary duty to all the creditors, not just to the unsecuredcreditors.")(emphasis in original); In re McCombs, 436 B.R. 421, 439 (Bankr.S.D.Tex. 2010)("As the representative of any Chapter 7 estate, the trustee has multiple fiduciary duties to the estate's creditors.")(citi......
-
Cage v. Smith (In re Smith)
...Sales, 494 B.R. 877, 881 (Bankr.S.D.Tex.2013) (citing Love v. Tyson Foods, Inc., 677 F.3d 258, 266 (5th Cir.2012)); In re McCombs, 436 B.R. 421, 439 (Bankr.S.D.Tex.2010) (citing Dodson v. Huff (In re Smyth), 207 F.3d 758, 761 (5th Cir.2000)). Here, the Trustee is doing exactly that; the Pro......
-
In re Bros. Materials, Ltd.
...with the terms of the Plan, rather than fees for services related to the Property sale. [ECF No. 144]. But cf. In re McCombs, 436 B.R. 421, 449 (Bankr. S.D. Tex. 2010) (allowing trustee to collect administrative expenses from the proceeds of secured collateral because "he effectuated the sa......
-
In re Bechuck
...of the debtor's estate, and, as such, is entrusted with certain duties regarding the estate. 11 U.S.C. § 704(a); In re McCombs, 436 B.R. 421, 439 (Bankr.S.D.Tex.2010). Under 11 U.S.C. § 327(a), the trustee may obtain approval to appoint professionals to assist him in carrying out his duties......