In re Mirsky, 092817 DCCA, 17-BG-567
|Opinion Judge:||PER CURIAM.|
|Party Name:||IN RE STEVEN E. MIRSKY A Suspended Member of the Bar of the District of Columbia Court of Appeals Bar Reg. No. 947531 2017 DDN 80|
|Judge Panel:||BEFORE: Beckwith, Associate Judge, and Nebeker and Steadman, Senior Judges.|
|Case Date:||September 28, 2017|
|Court:||Court of Appeals of Columbia District|
BEFORE: Beckwith, Associate Judge, and Nebeker and Steadman, Senior Judges.
On consideration of the certified order of the Maryland Court of Appeals indefinitely suspending respondent from the practice of law in the state of Maryland with the right to apply for reinstatement after no less than ninety days; this court's June 9, 2017, order temporarily suspending respondent in this case and directing him to show cause why functionally equivalent reciprocal discipline should not be imposed; the statement of Disciplinary Counsel regarding reciprocal discipline; it appearing that respondent did not file a response to this court's show cause order or file the required D.C. Bar R. XI, § 14 (g) affidavit; and it further appearing that respondent was previously suspended for a period of six months but, for the purpose of reinstatement, the suspension has not yet begun, see In re Mirsky, 860 A.2d 363 (D.C. 2004), it is
ORDERED that Steven E. Mirsky is hereby suspended from the practice of law in the District of Columbia for ninety days with reinstatement subject to a...
To continue readingFREE SIGN UP