In re MyFord Touch Consumer Litig.

Decision Date30 May 2014
Docket NumberNo. C–13–3072 EMC,C–13–3072 EMC
Citation46 F.Supp.3d 936
CourtU.S. District Court — Northern District of California
PartiesIn re MyFord Touch Consumer Litigation.

46 F.Supp.3d 936

In re MyFord Touch Consumer Litigation.

No. C–13–3072 EMC

United States District Court, N.D. California.

Signed May 30, 2014


46 F.Supp.3d 946

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS

(Docket No. 56)

EDWARD M. CHEN, United States District Judge

Plaintiffs are twenty-three persons and one organization residing in fifteen different states. They have filed a class action against Defendant Ford Motor Company, asserting, in essence, that an “infotainment system”—known as MyFord Touch (“MFT”)—used in certain of its vehicles (Ford, Lincoln, and Mercury) is defective and that Ford knew the system was defective at the time it sold the vehicles to Plaintiffs and other putative class members. Plaintiffs have asserted various claims under federal and state law, but the claims can loosely be categorized into (1) fraud claims and (2) breach-of-warranty claims. Ford has challenged the bulk of the claims in the currently pending motion to dismiss.

Having considered the parties' briefs and accompanying submissions, as well as the oral argument of counsel, the Court hereby GRANTS in part and DENIES in part Ford's motion.

I. FACTUAL & PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

As a preliminary matter, the Court provides below a chart which lists the name of each named Plaintiff, the state of Plaintiff's residence, whether Plaintiff purchased or leased the car, the car that was purchased or leased, and the date of purchase or lease.1

46 F.Supp.3d 947
Name State Purchase or Lease Car Date of Purchase or Lease
Jennifer Whalen California Purchase 2013 Ford Explorer XLT 4/2012
Center for Defensive Driving (CDD) California Lease 2013 Ford F–150 Lariat 2/22/2013
Grif Rosser California Purchase 2013 Ford Focus ST 9/29/2012
Megan Raney–Aarons California Lease 2012 Ford Edge 2/2012
Richard Decker Watson California Purchase 2011 Lincoln MKX 10/2012
Darcy Thomas–Maskrey California Purchase 2013 Ford Flex 7/2012
Angela Battle Alabama Purchase 2011 Ford Fusion 5/2011
Joe D'Aguanno Arizona Purchase 2013 Ford Explorer Sport 11/2012
James Laurence Sheerin Colorado Purchase 2013 Ford Explorer Limited 6/18/2012
Deb Makowski Connecticut Purchase 2011 Ford Escape 9/1/2011
46 F.Supp.3d 948
Name State Purchase or Lease Car Date of Purchase or Lease
George Oremland Florida Purchase 2012 Lincoln MKZ 12/2011
Thomas Mitchell Iowa Purchase 2011 Lincoln MKX 11/8/2010
William Creed Massachusetts Purchase 2011 Ford Explorer 3/14/2011
Joshua Matlin New Jersey Lease 2011 Ford Edge SE 10/28/2010
Russ Rizzo New Jersey Lease 2012 Ford Explorer XLT 4 Wheel Drive 2/2012
Jeffrey Miller New York Lease 2013 Ford Fusion Titanium 2/17/2013
Nuala Purcell New York Lease 2011 Ford Edge 11/2010
Daniel Fink North Carolina Purchase 2013 Ford Explorer 12/2012
Jason Zuchowski Ohio Lease 2012 Ford Edge 3/2012
Art Avedisian Pennsylvania Purchase 2011 Ford Expedition EL 1/31/2011
Jose Randy Rodriguez Texas Purchase 2012 Ford Focus Titanium 5/17/2011
Michael Ervin Texas Purchase 2013 Ford C–Max SEL 10/14/2012
Jason Connell Virginia Purchase 2011 Lincoln MKX 10/2010
Henry Miller–Jones Virginia Purchase 2013 Ford Fusion Titanium AWD 4/20/2013

In their operative complaint, Plaintiffs allege as follows.

The MFT system is

a factory-installed, integrated in-vehicle communication, navigation, and entertainment system that allows users to use a rearview camera, control vehicle climate, operate adaptive cruise control, receive navigational direction, make hands-free telephone calls, control music, and perform other functions with voice and touch commands. [MFT] also includes 9–1–1 Assist, which automatically contacts emergency personnel with the vehicle's coordinates in case of an accident. In addition to touchscreen and voice-based commands, [MFT] also features a steering wheel control panel.

FAC ¶ 232. Pictures of what the MFT system looks like can be found in paragraphs 242–43 and 245 of the complaint. Ford has promoted the MFT system, including in particular its safety, communication, and entertainment features, in various ways—e.g., on its website, through advertisements (including print and television),

46 F.Supp.3d 949

and through dealerships. See, e.g., FAC ¶¶ 22, 49, 66, 251–61.

MFT is powered by an operating system known as Ford SYNC. See FAC ¶ 3. Ford SYNC is also...

To continue reading

Request your trial
1 cases
  • In re Myford Touch Consumer Litig.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Northern District of California
    • 30 de maio de 2014
    ...46 F.Supp.3d 936In re MyFord Touch Consumer Litigation.No. C–13–3072 EMCUnited States District Court, N.D. California.Signed May 30, Motion granted in part and denied in part. [46 F.Supp.3d 946] ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS (Docket No. 56) EDWARD ......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT