In re National Credit Management Group, L.L.C.
Decision Date | 25 March 1998 |
Docket Number | No. CIV. A. 98-936(AJL).,CIV. A. 98-936(AJL). |
Citation | 21 F.Supp.2d 424 |
Parties | In re NATIONAL CREDIT MANAGEMENT GROUP, L.L.C., Glen Buzzetti, Individually and as an officer of National Credit Management Group, L.L.C.; and Joseph Ferguson, Individually and as an officer of National Credit Management Group, L.L.C. |
Court | U.S. District Court — District of New Jersey |
Debra A. Valentine, General Counsel, Catherine R. Fuller, John C. Hallerud, Federal Trade Commission, Chicago, IL, Faith S. Hochberg, United States Attorney, Kimberly Guadagno, AUSA, United States Attorneys' Office, Newark, NJ, for plaintiff F.T.C.
Peter Verniero, Attorney General of New Jersey, Gail M. Cookson, Deputy Attorney General, Division of Law, Newark, NJ, for plaintiffState of N.J.
Sheldon S. Lustigman, Andrew B. Lustigman, The Lustigman Firm, P.C., Hillsdale, NJ, Counsel for DefendantNational Credit Management Group, L.L.C.
William Harla, DeCotiis, Fitzpatrick & Gluck, Teaneck, NJ, Counsel for DefendantJoseph Ferguson.
Albert L. Buzzetti, Sekas & Buzzetti, L.L.C., Englewood Cliffs, NJ, Counsel for DefendantGlen Buzzetti.
This is an action brought by plaintiffs the Federal Trade Commission(the "FTC") and the New Jersey Attorney General(the "State of New Jersey") against defendants National Credit Management Group ("NCMG"), d/b/a "1-800-YES-CREDIT,"Glen Buzzetti("G. Buzzetti") and Joseph Ferguson("Ferguson")1(collectively, the "Defendants").The instant action alleges violations of Section 5(a)("Section 5") of the Federal Trade Commission Act (the "FTCA"), 15 U.S.C. § 45(a), the Credit Repair Organization Act (the "CROA"), 15 U.S.C. § 1679a et seq., the Telemarketing and Consumer Fraud and Abuse Prevention Action (the "TCFA"), 15 U.S.C. § 6101 et seq., the Telemarketing Sales Rule (the "TSR"), 16 C.F.R. Part 310 and the New Jersey Consumer Fraud Act (the "CFA"), N.J.S.A. 56:8-1 et seq.
On 3 March 1998, the Plaintiffs filed a complaint.2Specifically, the Plaintiffs seek, among other things, a permanent injunction enjoining the Defendants from further violations of the aforementioned statutes, appointment of a receiver and an asset freeze which extends to the assets of the Individual Defendants.SeeSecond Consolidated Complaint, ¶¶ 140-142, p. 39, ¶¶ 3,8;Moving Briefat 37-38.Jurisdiction is alleged pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331,1337(a),1345and1367, and15U.S.C. §§ 53(b),357b,6102(c),6103(a),6105(b),1679(h)(b)and1679h(c)(1).SeeSecond Consolidated Complaint, ¶ 4.
Currently before the court is an order to show cause (the "Order to Show Cause") seeking a preliminary injunction4 filed by the Plaintiffs.For the reasons set forth below, the request for a preliminary injunction is granted.5
On 3 March 1998, the FTC6 and the State of New Jersey7 each initiated separate suits and filed separate applications for the issuance of TROs in the instant action.During the 3 March 1998 Hearing, the two cases were consolidated and the Plaintiffs were directed to file a consolidated complaint captioned In Re National Credit Management GroupL.L.C., 98-936.8SeeTranscript from 3 March 1998 Hearingat p. 4, lines 8-11;p. 30, lines 6-10.The Defendants were initially served with the applications made by both the FTC and the State of New Jersey for TROs on 2 March 1998.SeeNCMG Chronologyat p. 4.At the 3 March 1998 Hearing, a return date was set for 20 March 1998 to allow the Plaintiffs to file a joint brief and the Defendants an opportunity to file opposition.SeeTranscript 3 March 1998 Hearingat p. 31, lines 15-21.The Plaintiffs also indicated a reply would be filed.Seeid. at p. 18, lines 17-18.
The Plaintiffs agreed to treat the instant proceeding and the hearing to be held on 20 March 1998(the "20 March 1998 Hearing") as one for a preliminary injunction.SeeTranscript from 3 March 1998 Hearingat p. 35, lines 18, 21-22.The parties declined, however, to treat the 20 March 1998 Hearing as a hearing for a permanent injunction.Seeid. at p. 35, line 6.
At the 20 March 1998 Hearing, the parties were heard on the issue of whether a preliminary injunction should be issued.9
NCMG, which also conducts business under the name of "1-800-YES-CREDIT," advertises credit monitoring and credit card services.SeeSmithCert. at ¶ 2;Second Consolidated Complaint, ¶ 8.NCMG was formed as a New Jersey limited liability company by G. Buzzetti and Ferguson in 1995.SeeSmithCert. at ¶ 2;see also Certificate of Formation of NCMG attached as Exh.A to Smith Cert.The publicly disseminated mailing address for NCMG is 177 Main Street Suite 230, Fort Lee, New Jersey,10 but NCMG is physically located at 115 River Road, Edgewater, New Jersey.SeeSmithCert. at ¶ 2.
G. Buzzetti is the Chief Executive Officer, President and eighty-percent equity owner of NCMG.11SeeSmithCert. at ¶ 8; G. Buzzetti Deposition "), dated 17 October 1997, attached as Exh. F. to SmithCert. at p. 12, lines 5-7.Ferguson is the Chief Financial Officer, Vice President and twenty-percent equity owner of NCMG.SeeG. Buzzetti Dep. attached as Exh. F. to SmithCert. at p. 13, lines 6-10; Ferguson Deposition (the "Ferguson Dep."), dated 10 October 1997, attached as Exh. E to SmithCert. at p. 10, lines 3-10. G. Buzzetti and Ferguson have been and are the only two equity members of NCMG.SeeSmithCert. at ¶ 8.
Beginning in March 1995, the Defendants offered credit monitoring services to consumers throughout the United States.SeeSecond Consolidated Complaint, ¶ 12.Almost from the start, NCMG used the "1-800-YES-CREDIT" toll-free line as the central marketing focus of its business.SeeFerguson Dep. attached as Ex. E to SmithCert. at p. 45, line 21 to p. 46, line 19.The Defendants placed advertisements on cable television and radio for the toll-free telephone number, "1-800-YES-CREDIT."SeeSecond Consolidated Complaint, ¶ 13.These advertisements indicate that if an individual has credit problems he or she should call "1-800-YES-CREDIT" to receive a "confidential analysis" regarding his or her credit history.Seeid.Many of these advertisements also promise NCMG provides consumers with a complimentary "approved" application for a major credit card without a security deposit.Seeid.
NCMG receives a daily estimate of 5,000 weekday and 1,500 weekend "inbound" telephone calls from consumers responding to its television and radio advertisements.SeeSmithCert. at ¶ 13;Ferguson Dep. attached as Exh. E to Smith Decl.at p. 50, lines 2-3 (estimating 6,000 to 7,000 incoming calls daily).NCMG does not engage in "cold calling."SeeFerguson Dep. attached Exh. E to SmithCert. at p. 38, lines 10-12.On average, five to nine percent of consumers calling the toll-free number purchase the initial credit analysis (the "Initial Analysis") offered by NCMG for $ 95.00.SeeG. Buzzetti Dep. attached as Exh. F to SmithCert. at p. 58, lines 1-7.NCMG has approximately 100,000 to 150,000 customers who have either purchased the Initial Analysis or the two-year program (the "Program") offered by NCMG to consumers who either desire to establish or re-establish their credit.SeeFerguson Dep. attached as Exh. E. to SmithCert. at p. 64, lines 11-18.
In its first two years of operations, NCMG grew from having only a few employees to a company with more than 270 employees.SeeSmithCert. at ¶ 39;Ferguson Dep. attached as Exh. E to SmithCert. at p. 19, lines 19-22 and p. 25 lines 13-16.The net revenues of NCMG for the six months ended 30 June 1997 was $ 6,318,975.SeeFinancial Statements attached as Exh. E to SmithCert. at 3.
Since its inception, the Individual Defendants have participated in and supervised the day-to-day operations of NCMG.SeeSmithCert. at ¶ 8;Second Consolidated Complaint, ¶¶ 9-10.Both G. Buzzetti and Ferguson help produce the materials used by NCMG and provided to consumers.SeeFerguson Dep. attached as Exh. E to SmithCert. at p. 44, lines 7-8;G. Buzzetti Dep. attached as Exh. F to SmithCert. at p. 21, lines 6-18.Ferguson also oversees the computer and telephone systems, as well as the distribution and processing departments.SeeFerguson Dep. attached as Exh. E to SmithCert. at p. 19, line 24 to p. 20, line 18.Additionally, G. Buzzetti supervises the advertising campaigns and the sales staffs of the customer relations and credit analyst departments.SeeG. Buzzetti Dep. attached as Exh. F to SmithCert. at p. 27, line 6 to p. 28, line 7;p. 34, line 17 to p. 35, line 4.In fact, G. Buzzetti has designed and produced most of the advertisements.12Seeid. p. 34, line 17 to p. 35, line 24.
On 28 January 1996, NCMG was identified as a potential target of an FTC investigation known as "Operation Payback."SeePlaintiffs' Chronologyat 2.Operation Payback involved a nationwide sweep of credit repair companies.Seeid.This investigation led to the filing of a complaint in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois against NCMG by the Illinois Attorney General(the "Illinois Action").Seeid. at 3.
The Illinois Attorney General asserted claims arising under the TSR, the Illinois Credit Services Act (the "ICSA"), which is similar to the CROA, and the Illinois Consumer Fraud Act (the "ICFA").SeeA. BuzzettiCert. at ¶ 2.The suit sought to enjoin the collection of fees by NCMG prior to the completion of the two-year program offered by NCMG.Seeid.
NCMG filed a counterclaim in the Illinois Action alleging that the ICSA, ICFA and the advance-fee restrictions regarding credit improvement services of the TSR violated the First Amendmentas applied and on their face.SeeA. BuzzettiCert. at ¶ 3;see also Counterclaim attached as Exh. 1 to A. Buzzetti Cert.
The judge presiding over...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 7-day Trial
-
Wisconsin v. Stockbridge-Munsee Community
...moving party only need show that there is some reasonable likelihood of future violations. Id. Similarly, In re National Credit Management Group, L.L.C., 21 F.Supp.2d 424 (D.N.J.1998), the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) and the State of New Jersey sought to enjoin violations of various stat......
-
Fed. Trade Comm'n v. Adept Mgmt., Inc.
...109FTC v. Windward Mktg., Ltd., No. Civ.A. 1:96-CV-615-F, 1997 WL 33642380 (N.D. Ga. Sept. 30, 1997) . 107In re Nat'l Credit Mgmt. Grp., LLC, 21 F. Supp. 2d 424 (D.N.J. 1998) ................................................. 114, 115United States v. Iron Mountain Mines, Inc., 812 F. Supp. 1......
-
Marsellis-Warner v. Rabens
...enjoined or restrained. Fed.R.Civ.P. 65; Elliott v. Kiesewetter, 98 F.3d 47, 59-60 (3d Cir.1996); In re Nat'l Credit Management Group, L.L.C., 21 F.Supp.2d 424, 463 (D.N.J.1998); Brodsky, 993 F.Supp. at a. Likelihood Marsellis-Warner Will Prevail on the Merits of its Common Law Claims For p......
-
Fed. Trade Comm'n v. Wyndham Worldwide Corp.
...(C.D.Cal.2010).18 Hotels and Resorts does not dispute the materiality element of this standard. See also In re Nat'l Credit Mgmt. Grp., L.L.C., 21 F.Supp.2d 424, 441 (D.N.J.1998) (“Explicit claims or deliberately-made implicit claims utilized to induce the purchase of a service or product a......
-
Operations
...debts was a proposed sale of property triggering the bankruptcy code sale provisions. In re National Credit Management Group, LLC, 21 F. Supp. 2d 424 (D. N.J. 1998). Court found that individual members who acted in their official LLC capacity, still liable under provisions of the FTC Act th......
-
Credit repair organizations after regulation: wolves in nonprofits' clothing?
...do not merit the proscription of fees in toto. See, e.g., 15 U.S.C. [section] 1679b(2); In re National Credit Management Group, L.L.C., 21 F. Supp.2d 424, 459 (D.N.J. (4) However, reputable companies sometimes can negotiate much lower interest rates for consumers and require a budget, which......