In Re: Net Pay Solutions Inc

Docket Number15-2833
Decision Date10 May 2016
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
10 cases
  • United States v. One (1) Palmetto State Armory Pa–15 Machinegun Receiver/Frame, Unknown Caliber Serial Number: LW001804
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Third Circuit
    • May 18, 2016
    ... ... forfeiture claims are still pending, which led us to question whether the decision being appealed ... swallow the rule); In re New York City Shoes, Inc., 880 F.2d 679, 685 n. 6 (3d Cir.1989) (same); ... are more dangerous than machine guns.) (internal citation omitted); United States v. Kirk, 105 ... ...
  • FBI Wind Down Inc. v. Innovative Delivery Sys., Inc. (In re FBI Wind Down, Inc.)
    • United States
    • U.S. Bankruptcy Court — District of Delaware
    • February 16, 2018
    ...(Bankr. D. Del. 2009).58 Begier v. IRS , 496 U.S. 53, 58, 110 S.Ct. 2258, 110 L.Ed.2d 46 (1990).59 Slobodian v. IRS (In re Net Pay Solutions, Inc. ), 822 F.3d 144, 154 (3d Cir. 2016) (citing Begier v. IRS ) (internal quotations omitted).60 Butner v. United States , 440 U.S. 48, 55, 99 S.Ct.......
  • Dots, LLC v. Milberg Factors, Inc. (In re Dots, LLC.)
    • United States
    • U.S. Bankruptcy Court — District of New Jersey
    • January 10, 2017
    ...dealing with financially distressed business, and to ensure that those creditors are treated equitably. See In re Net Pay Sols., Inc. , 822 F.3d 144, 150 (3d Cir. 2016) ; In re Friedman's Inc. , 738 F.3d 547, 558 (3d Cir. 2013) ; see also In re Molded Acoustical Prod., Inc. , 18 F.3d 217. A......
  • Connolly v. Asbestos Abatement, Inc. (In re Iley)
    • United States
    • U.S. Bankruptcy Court — District of Colorado
    • September 17, 2019
    ...acting as AAI's payroll service provider. The Third Circuit dealt with a similar situation in Slobodian v. United States (In re Net Pay Solutions, Inc.) , 822 F.3d 144 (3d Cir. 2016). The debtor in Net Pay was also a payroll service provider. It managed its clients' payroll by calculating t......
  • Get Started for Free

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT