In re Nichols' Trust Fund
Decision Date | 19 February 1934 |
Parties | IN RE MARGARET SPENCER NICHOLS TRUST FUND, J. W. RATEKIN, TRUSTEE, MARGARET MIDDLEKOFF LOVEGREEN, BENEFICIARY, APPELLANT, v. JAMES STANLEY NICHOLS ET AL., RESPONDENTS |
Court | Kansas Court of Appeals |
Appeal from Circuit Court of Callaway County.--Hon. North Todd Gentry, Judge.
REVERSED AND REMANDED (with directions).
Reversed and remanded.
Baker & Baker for respondents.
John L Plowman for appellant.
The will of Margaret Spencer Nichols, deceased, was proven and admitted to probate in Callaway County on December 31, 1920. Item or clause 3 of the will follows:
The estate of decedent was administered and final settlement thereof made in May, 1922, at which time the property in the estate of the estimated value of $ 8157.58 was delivered to J. W. Ratekin, the trustee named in the will.
Noah Harry Nichols, son of testatrix, died February 22, 1932. Thereafter, said trustee presented to the Circuit Court of Callaway County his petition, stating therein the manner in which he had performed the trust, the amounts received and disbursed, and prayed the court to approve his report and adjudge the respective rights and interests of the parties to this proceeding in the trust property.
The beneficiaries, James Stanley Nichols and Gladys Long Banta, filed their joint answer. Margaret Lovegreen filed separate answer. Neither answer has been assailed. The cause was tried and resulted in a decree which surcharged the accounts of the trustee and adjudged that the costs of administration "be deducted from the body of the estate and not from the income," and in effect charged against the interest of Margaret Lovegreen a part of the amount of the principal of the estate which the trustee had expended in supporting and maintaining Noah Harry Nichols. Of the parties in interest only Margaret Lovegreen has appealed.
The trustee in administering the trust expended the sum of $ 4213.27 in supporting and maintaining Noah Harry Nichols, of which sum $ 2577.40 was taken from the principal of the trust estate. The trustee also expended the sum of about $ 1300, the exact amount is left in doubt, in paying taxes and costs of administration.
The appellant argues that the expenses of executing a trust created in a will should be charged against income derived from the trust estate and not against the c...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Brookings v. Mississippi Val. Trust Co.
... ... 767, 131 S.W. 793; Melvin v. Hoffman, 290 Mo. 464, ... 235 S.W. 107; Rossi v. Davis, 345 Mo. 362, 133 ... S.W.2d 363; In re Nichols Trust Fund, 228 Mo.App ... 489, 68 S.W.2d 917. (2) The general rule as to the charging ... of expenses of executing a trust created by will ... ...
-
Lang v. Mississippi Val. Trust Co.
... ... 377; ... Hayes v. St. Louis Union Trust Co., 317 Mo. 1028, ... 298 S.W. 91. Compare also, for general rule, In re ... Nichols Trust Fund, 228 Mo.App. 489, 68 S.W.2d 917; ... Rothschild v. Weinthel, 191 Ind. 85, 131 N.E. 917; ... Jordan v. Jordan, 192 Mass. 337, 78 N.E ... ...
- Perry v. First Nat. Bank