In re Omeprazole Patent Litigation
Decision Date | 31 May 2007 |
Docket Number | No. 00 Civ. 6749(BSJ).,No. 03 Civ. 8719(BSJ).,No. 01 Civ. 2998(BSJ).,No. 03 Civ. 6057(BSJ).,MDL Docket No. 1291.,No. M-21-81 (BSJ),,No. 00 Civ. 7597(BSJ).,No. 00 Civ. 4541(BSJ).,No. 01 Civ. 9351(BSJ).,M-21-81 (BSJ),,00 Civ. 6749(BSJ).,03 Civ. 6057(BSJ).,00 Civ. 4541(BSJ).,03 Civ. 8719(BSJ).,01 Civ. 9351(BSJ).,00 Civ. 7597(BSJ).,01 Civ. 2998(BSJ). |
Citation | 490 F.Supp.2d 381 |
Parties | In re OMEPRAZOLE PATENT LITIGATION. Astrazeneca AB, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Mylan Laboratories Inc., et al., Defendants. Astrazeneca AB, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Laboratorios Dr. Esteve, S.A., et al., Defendants. Astrazeneca AB, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Lek Pharmaceutical and Chemical Co., D.D., et al., Defendants. Astrazeneca AB, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Apotex Corp., et al., Defendants. Astrazeneca AB, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Impax Laboratories, Inc., Defendant. |
Court | U.S. District Court — Southern District of New York |
Opinion & Order
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 7-day Trial
32 cases
-
Ca Inc. v. Simple.Com Inc.
...copyright date, be presented as proof of publication for books, articles, or trade publications.”) (citing In re Omeprazole Patent Litig., 490 F.Supp.2d 381, 517–522 (S.D.N.Y.2007) as “accepting prior art references as printed publications without additional evidence of their publication da......
-
Research v. Apotex Inc.
...& Co. v. Actavis Elizabeth LLC, 676 F.Supp.2d 352, 377–78 (D.N.J.2009); AstraZeneca, 623 F.Supp.2d at 598–99; In re Omeprazole Patent Litig., 490 F.Supp.2d 381, 499 (S.D.N.Y.2007); Depomed, Inc. v. Ivax Corp., 532 F.Supp.2d 1170, 1181–82 (N.D.Cal.2007); Purdue Pharma L.P. v. Boehringer Inge......
-
Levenger Co. v. Feldman
...one year prior to the date of the application for patent in the United States." 35 U.S.C. "§ 102(b); see In re Omeprazole Patent Litigation, 490 F.Supp.2d 381, 510 (S.D.N.Y.2007). In order to show that a claim is invalid due to anticipation by prior art, a party must prove "that all of the ......
-
Focus Prods. Grp. Int'l, LLC v. Kartri Sales Co.
...the grade of an incline is the distance over which it increases in elevation.9 Howes , 679 F.2d at 1028 ; Astrazeneca AB v. Mylan Labs., Inc. , 490 F. Supp. 2d 381, 535 (S.D.N.Y. 2007) ; Plastic Contact Lens Co. v. W.R.S. Contact Lens Labs., Inc. , 330 F. Supp. 441, 443 (S.D.N.Y. 1970)10 Th......
Get Started for Free
7 books & journal articles
-
Remedies
...(N.D. Ill.1987) (citing Glaros v. H.H. Robertson Co., 797 F.2d 1564, 1569–72 (Fed. Cir.1986)). 78. See In re Omeprazole Patent Litig., 490 F. Supp. 2d 381, 522 (S.D.N.Y. 2007); Smiths Indus. Med. Sys., Inc. v. Vital Signs, Inc., 183 F.3d 1347, 1353 (Fed. Cir. 1999). 79. Smith Int’l, Inc. v.......
-
Remedies
...Ill.1987) (citing Glaros v. H.H. Robertson Co., 797 F.2d 1564, 1569–72 (Fed. Cir. 1986)). 73. See In re Omeprazole Patent Litig.; 490 F. Supp. 2d 381, 522 (S.D.N.Y. 2007); Smiths Indus. Med. Sys., Inc. v. Vital Signs, Inc., 183 F.3d 1347, 1353 (Fed. Cir. 1999). 74. Smith Int’l., Inc. v. Hug......
-
Experts
...when construing the claims in 28. See AstraZeneca v. Apotex, 633 F.3d 1042 (Fed. Cir. 2010). 29. See In re Omeprazole Patent Litig., 490 F. Supp. 2d 381 (S.D.N.Y. 2007); Depomed, Inc. v. Ivax Corp., 532 F. Supp. 2d 1170 (N.D. Cal. 2007); GlaxoSmithKline Plc v. Hikma Pharm. Co., 2012 U.S. Di......
-
Experts
...702. 28. See AstraZeneca LP v. Apotex, 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 22660 (Fed. Cir. Nov. 1, 2010). 29. See In re Omeprazole Patent Litig., 490 F. Supp. 2d 381 (S.D.N.Y. 2007); Depomed, Inc. v. IVAX Corp., 532 F. Supp. 2d 1170 (N.D. Cal. 2007). 30. See ALZA Corp. v. Mylan Labs., Inc., 464 F.3d 1286......
Get Started for Free