In re Op. of the Justices
Decision Date | 06 May 2009 |
Docket Number | Request of the Senate, No. 2009–251. |
Court | New Hampshire Supreme Court |
Parties | OPINION OF THE JUSTICES (VOTING AGE IN PRIMARY ELECTIONS II). |
Jeffrey A. Meyers, senate legal counsel, filed a memorandum on behalf of the President of the New Hampshire Senate in favor of the constitutionality of Senate Bill 21.
Peter H. Burling, of Cornish, and Kathleen N. Sullivan, of Manchester, filed a memorandum as members of the New Hampshire Democratic National Committee in favor of the constitutionality of Senate Bill 21.
Brendan P. Bertagnoll, filed a memorandum on behalf of the New Hampshire Legislative Youth Advisory Council, in favor of the constitutionality of Senate Bill 21.
The New Hampshire Senate adopted the following resolution on April 1, 2009, and filed it with the supreme court on April 3, 2009:
To the Honorable Senate:
The following response is respectfully returned:
Senate Bill (SB) 21 proposes to amend RSA 654:1 (2008) by adding a new section, RSA 654:1, III, which would provide: "A person who is 17 years of age, who otherwise meets the eligibility requirements of paragraph I, may vote at a state primary election or a presidential primary election preceding a general election at which the person will be 18 years of age."
SB 21 also proposes to amend RSA 654:7 (2008) to add the following emphasized language to the voter registration form prescribed by the secretary of state: "I understand that to vote in this city/town, I must be at least 18 years of age, or 17 years of age to vote in a state primary or presidential primary preceding a general election at which I will be 18 years of age, and that I must be a United States citizen, and I must be domiciled in this city/town."
Additionally, SB 21 proposes to add a new statute, RSA 654:7–c, "Registration by 17–Year–Old Voting at Primary Election," which would provide:
Finally, SB 21 proposes to amend RSA 654:12, I(b) (2008) to include the following emphasized language: "
SB 21 is identical to the legislation upon which we were asked to opine in Opinion of the Justices (Voting Age in Primaries), 157 N.H. 265, 267, 949 A.2d 670 (2008) (Voting Age I ). In Voting Age I, we were asked whether the proposed legislation violated Part I, Article 11 of the New Hampshire Constitution, which provides, in pertinent part, that "every inhabitant of the state of 18 years of age and upwards shall have an equal right to vote in any election." Voting Age I, 157 N.H. at 267, 949 A.2d 670. We concluded that the proposed legislation, which allowed individuals who were younger than eighteen years of age to vote in presidential and state primary elections, violated Part I, Article 11 of the State Constitution. Id. In Voting Age I, we observed that although those submitting memoranda addressed the issue, we had not been asked and therefore would not opine upon whether the proposed legislation infringed upon the associational rights of political parties guaranteed by the First Amendment to the United States Constitution. Id.
In the instant matter, we have been asked to give our opinion upon three questions that are related to the issue we left open in Voting Age I: (1) whether enactment of SB 21 would "infringe upon the associational rights guaranteed to political parties under the First and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution"; (2) whether Part I, Article 11 and Part I, Article 32 of the New Hampshire Constitution provide less protection to the associational rights of political parties than do the First and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution; and (3) if the answer to the second question is "yes," would SB 21 be constitutional notwithstanding our opinion in Voting Age I.
In discussing these questions, the President of the New Hampshire Senate argues that Part I, Article 11 of the New Hampshire Constitution, as we interpreted it in Voting Age I, impermissibly burdens the right of association guaranteed to political parties by the Federal Constitution to the extent that it precludes an otherwise qualified seventeen-year-old voter from voting in a state or presidential primary, and, therefore, Part I, Article 11 must yield to this federal constitutional right.
Based, in part, upon her submission, we have reframed the questions as follows: (1) whether Part I, Article 11 of the State Constitution, as we interpreted it in Voting Age I, conflicts with the associational rights guaranteed to political parties by Part I, Article 32 of the State Constitution and the First and Fourteenth Amendments to the Federal Constitution in that it precludes the State from allowing political parties to invite unqualified voters to vote in primary elections; and (2) whether Part I, Article 32 of the State Constitution is less protective of the associational rights of political parties than are the First and Fourteenth Amendments to the Federal Constitution such that, under the Supremacy Clause, the First and Fourteenth Amendments take precedence. We answer both questions in the negative.
We first address the protection available to the associational rights of political parties under Part I, Article 32 of the State Constitution. Part I, Article 32 of the State Constitution provides: "The people have a right, in an orderly and peaceable manner, to assemble and consult upon the common good, give instructions to their representatives, and to request of the legislative body, by way of petition or remonstrance, redress of the wrongs done them, and of the grievances they suffer." This provision " guarantees the same right to free speech and association" as does the First Amendment to the Federal Constitution. Opinion of the Justices, 121 N.H. 434, 437, 430 A.2d 191 ...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Carrigan v. N.H. Dep't of Health & Human Servs.
... ... 2334, 189 L.Ed.2d 246 (2014). In New Hampshire, standing in the traditional sense is grounded in Part II, Article 74 of the State Constitution, which provides: "Each branch of the legislature as well as the governor and council shall have authority to require the opinions of the justices of the supreme court upon important questions of law and upon solemn occasions." N.H. CONST. pt. II, art. 74 ; see Duncan , 166 N.H. at 642-43, 102 A.3d 913. Thus, while the respective branches of the legislature, the governor, and the executive council may request our advisory opinion on ... ...
-
Sumner v. N.H. Sec'y of State
... ... State of N.H., 153 N.H. 120, 125, 888 A.2d 1236 (2005). The State asserts an interest in preserving "the integrity, fairness, and efficiency of" the election process. We have noted that this interest is indisputably compelling. See Opinion of the Justices (Voting Age in Primary Elections II), 158 N.H. 661, 670, 973 A.2d 915 (2009). It justifies the State's imposition of "certain eligibility requirements for voters ... even though they limit a political party's ability to garner support and members," including the establishment of "an age ... ...