In re Opinion of the Justices
Decision Date | 25 February 1897 |
Citation | 46 N.E. 118,167 Mass. 599 |
Parties | In re OPINION OF THE JUSTICES. |
Court | United States State Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts Supreme Court |
Opinion of the justices on a question submitted by the house of representatives.
The opinion of the supreme judicial court was requested by the following:
“House of Representatives, Jan. 27, 1897.
To the Honorable the House of Representatives of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts:
The undersigned, justices of the supreme judicial court, respectfully submit the following answer to the question proposed by the honorable house by its order of January 27, 1897, a copy of which is annexed:
In the constitution (part 2, c. 1, § 2, art. 8) it is provided as follows: “The senate shall be a court with full authority to hear and determineall impeachments made by the house of representatives, against any officer or officers of the commonwealth, for misconduct and maladministration in their offices.” By virtue of this provision, no one can be impeached except officers of the commonwealth, and it is necessary to determine whether county commissioners fall within this description. There are several classes of civil officers within the commonwealth; for example, town or city officers, county officers, officers of districts, and state officers. In a certain sense, all of these officers may be deemed to be officers of the commonwealth, and it is possible, accordingly, to take the view that all are subject to impeachment. But in our opinion this provision of the constitution was not intended to include all civil officers, of every grade, within the commonwealth. On the one hand, it seems to us that the various officers of cities or towns do not fall within the class of officers of the commonwealth, in the sense in which these words are used in this provision of the constitution. On the other hand, officers elected by the people at large, or provided for in the constitution, for the administration of matters of general or state concern, are subject to impeachment. The intention of the framers of the constitution in respect to such officers as county...
To continue reading
Request your trial- In re Opinion of the Justices
-
Commonwealth v. Dowe
... ... eighty dollars ($80.00), under an agreement and with an ... understanding that his, the said Robert M. Dowe [sic], vote, ... opinion and judgment should be given in a particular manner ... and upon a particular side of a question, cause and ... proceeding which was then pending ... our opinion, was a public officer and not a mere employee ... Attorney General v. Tillinghast, 203 Mass. 539 ... Opinion of the Justices, 303 Mass. 631 , 637, 638 ... O'Connell v. Retirement Board of Boston, 254 ... Mass. 404 ... Robertson v. Commissioner of Civil ... Service, 259 ... ...
-
Commonwealth v. Connolly
... ... Connolly's vote, opinion, judgment and decision should be given in a particular manner, and upon a particular side of a question, cause and proceeding which was then pending, ... of the courts, by the people of the several counties, * * * for such term of office as the legislature shall prescribe.’ Opinion of the Justices, 117 Mass. 603;Commonwealth v. Mather, 121 Mass. 65G.L.(Ter.Ed.) c. 221, § 3, provides for a clerk for the Superior Court of the county of Suffolk ... ...
- In re Opinion of the Justices