In re Opinion of the Justices
Citation | 154 A. 632 |
Parties | In re OPINION OF THE JUSTICES. |
Decision Date | 03 March 1931 |
Court | Supreme Court of New Hampshire |
Questions by the House of Representatives to the Justices of the Supreme Court as to the constitutionality of a section of an income tax bill.
Questions answered.
See, also, 149 A. 321.
Elwin L. Page, of Concord, for the bill.
The paragraphs referred to read as follows.
To continue reading
Request your trial3 cases
-
Colgate v. Harvey
...Mass. 593, 170 N. E. 800, 803. It may allow reasonable deductions of business expenditures from business income. In re Opinion of the Justices, 85 N. H. 570, 154 A. 632, 633; State v. Wisconsin Tax Commission, 185 Wis. 525, 201 N. W. 764, 766. It may provide for a graduated progressive rate......
-
James C. Colgate v. Erwin M. Harvey
......32] after the March Term, 1933,. Washington County, Bicknell, J., presiding. Judgment. for the defendant. The plaintiff excepted. The opinion states. the case. Affirmed. . . . . Judgment affirmed. . . . Theriault & Hunt (E. J. Dimock of ...City of Burlington, supra; Equitable. Finance Co. v. Board of Supervisors, 146 Miss. 734, 111. So. 871; Opinions of the Justices, 76 N.H. 609. . . . Exemption of credit from taxation is not the exemption of. property and does not violate a ......
-
Franko v. Oh. Chem. & Mfg. Co., 96.
...... PER CURIAM. The judgment under review herein should be affirmed for the reasons 'expressed in the opinion delivered per curiam in the Supreme Court, 150 A. 221, 8 N. J. Misc. Rep. 376. For affirmance: The CHIEF JUSTICE, Justices PARKER, ......