In re Ortiz Vega, Bankruptcy No. B-84-00713(ESL)
Decision Date | 08 July 1987 |
Docket Number | Bankruptcy No. B-84-00713(ESL),Adv. No. 85-0309. |
Citation | 75 BR 858 |
Parties | In re Rafael ORTIZ VEGA, Catalina Vega Torres, Debtor. Rafael ORTIZ VEGA, Catalina Vega Torres, Plaintiff/Movant, v. ASOCIACION EMPLEADOS DEL ESTADO LIBRE ASOCIADO DE PUERTO RICO, Defendant/Respondent. |
Court | U.S. Bankruptcy Court — District of Puerto Rico |
Maria Luisa Contreras, San Juan, P.R., for debtor.
Rafael A. Rivera Cruz, San Juan, P.R., for Asociacion De Empleados Del ELA.
Robert J. Griswold, San Juan, P.R., Chapter 13 Trustee.
The matter pending before the Court is whether debtors have a right to recover property of the estate claimed as exempt in a Chapter 13 petition. The threshold issue is whether the Chapter 13 debtor may recover the property claimed as exempt.
The debtors-plaintiffs Rafael Ortiz Vega and Catalina Vega Torres (hereinafter "debtors") moved the Court to recover certain monies listed as savings in Schedule B-4 of their petition and also claimed as exempt property pursuant to § 522(d)(1) and (5) of the Bankruptcy Code.
The defendant Asociación de Empleados del Estado Libre Asociado de Puerto Rico (hereinafter "Asociación") alleges that it is a secured creditor as to the monies withheld from the debtors' salary checks and the interests accrued at the time of the filing of the petition, and further alleges that the Asociación is entitled to a set-off. No authorities were cited by the defendant to support the remedy requested.
The parties were heard on this matter on December 2, 1986. Default was entered against the Asociación upon its failure to answer the complaint as ordered by the court on September 26, 1986. The Court gave the parties fifteen (15) days to file legal memoranda on the issue of whether a Chapter 13 debtor can recover exempt property under 11 U.S.C. § 522. Based upon the pleadings submitted by the parties and pursuant to Bankruptcy Rule 7052, this Court enters the following findings of fact and conclusions of law:
Findings of Fact
1. On June 26, 1984 the debtors filed for relief under Chapter 13. The debtors included in their petition as exempt property under 11 U.S.C. § 522(d)(1), (5) the amount of $5,235.08 claimed as savings withheld by the Asociación.
2. The debtors included in their petition two loans with the Asociación: loan number XXX-XX-XXXX for the amount of $6,000.00 and loan number XXX-XX-XXXX for the amount of $4,200.00. Said loans were listed as unsecured loans in the Schedule of Debts, page 1, of the debtors' petition.
3. On September 27, 1985 the debtor moved the Court through the instant proceeding to recover the aforementioned amount of $5,235.08 claimed as exempt property pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 522(d)(1), and (5).
4. The claims' register for this case shows that up to this date, the Asociación has filed only one proof of claim that includes loan number XXX-XX-XXXX for the amount of $4,200.00. No proof of claim has been filed for loan number XXX-XX-XXXX for the amount of $6,000.00.
5. The debtors are employees of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico.
Section 1306 of the Bankruptcy Code provides that:
The language of Congress is very clear regarding what constitutes property of the estate and the scope of 11 U.S.C. § 1306. Senate Report No. 95-989, 95th Cong.2d Sess. at pages 140-141 (1978), U.S.Code Cong. & Admin.News 1978, pp. 5787, 5926, 5927, provides that:
2. Section 541(a)(1) of the Bankruptcy Code provides in its relevant part that:
The scope of the aforecited paragraph (1) is broad. It includes all kinds of property, both tangible and intangible. See, 4 Collier on Bankruptcy (15th Edition) in ¶ 541.06 at page 541-26. The thrust of § 541(a)(1) is to bring into the estate all interests of the debtor in property as of the date the case is commenced. Thus, as a general rule, the estate created under § 541(a)(1) will include all legal or equitable interests of the debtor in property, both tangible and intangible, including exempt property, as of the date the case is commenced. Ibid, at pages 541-28 and 541-29.
The property in question is comprised of employee savings withheld by the Puerto Rico Commonwealth Employee Association (Association) pursuant to the Puerto Rico Commonwealth Employee Association Act (Act), Section 862, et seq. of Title 3, Laws of Puerto Rico Annotated (hereinafter "L.P.R.A.").
The Act has established a fund, the Savings and Loan Fund, 3 L.P.R.A. § 862g, obtained by a compulsory three percent deduction from the total salary or pension of government employees. The purpose of the Act and the fund created thereunder is:
3 L.P.R.A. § 862b.
The funds belong exclusively to the member employees, Buscaglia v. Tax Court, 67 P.R.R. 532 (1947), and are, thus, property of the estate within the scope of section 541(a) of the Bankruptcy Code.
The debtors herein are both government employees. They are teachers working at the Department of Education of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico. Being employees within the purview of 3 L.P.R.A. § 862a(b) they are subject to mandatory deductions to the fund. The debtors' savings for all material times to the case at bar are $5,235.08.
The Association, through its Board of Directors, is authorized to grant loans, make deductions to be credited to the loans granted and to apply the employee's savings to outstanding obligations with the Association and with the employee's organization.1
The Act also provides that an employee's savings are exempt from taxes, attachment or execution "except that, when the employee is indebted to the Association for a loan, as surety, or on any other obligation, such amount shall be applied to the partial or full payment of such debt." 3 L.P.R.A. § 863c. See also 3 L.P.R.A. § 863d.
The analysis of the aforementioned provisions of the Act indicates that the Association has a statutory lien2 over the employee's savings at the time of the filing of the petition. The Act provides specifically that said savings will be applied in partial or full payment of an outstanding loan. However, any deductions after the filing of the petition can only be construed as an assignment of future wages. Such an assignment does not give rise to a lien within the meaning of the Bankruptcy Code. In re Miranda Soto, 667 F.2d 235, 237 (1st Cir.1981).
The assignment of future wages as security for a prepetition debt is rendered ineffective by § 552(a)3 of the Bankruptcy Code. In re Miranda Soto, supra; In re Walker, 35 B.R. 237, 242 (Bankr.N.D.Ga. 1983).
Section 522(h) of Title 11, United States Code, provides that:
It is now settled that a Chapter 13 debtor may avoid transfers of property to the extent that the property could have been exempted had the trustee avoided the transfer. 3 BR L.Ed. § 22.58, page 100; In re Donato, 17 B.R. 708 (Bankr.E.D.VA. 1982); Lee v. Schweiker, 739 F.2d 870 (3d Cir.1984); In re...
To continue reading
Request your trial