In re People
| Decision Date | 20 October 2016 |
| Docket Number | Court of Appeals No. 14CA1142 |
| Citation | 452 P.3d 36 |
| Parties | The PEOPLE of the State of Colorado, Plaintiff–Appellee, IN the INTEREST OF T.B., Juvenile–Appellant. |
| Court | Colorado Court of Appeals |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
3 cases
- People v. Henley
- People ex rel. L.C.
-
Packard v. Industrial Claim Appeals Office
... ... See 8-43-103(2). 25 Second, claimants proposed construction would render the statute of limitations meaningless, a result which is also prohibited. See Pineda-Liberato v. People , 2017 CO 95, 39, 403 P.3d 160 ("We cannot, however, interpret statutory provisions so as to render any of their words or phrases meaningless or superfluous."); Berthold v. Indus. Claim Appeals Office , 2017 COA 145, 32, 410 P.3d 810. As the City points out, claimants proposed construction ... ...
2 books & journal articles
-
ARTICLE 6
...import a sexual abuse of a child component from the legislative declaration into the statute. People in Interest of T.B., 2016 COA 151M, 452 P.3d 36, aff'd, 2019 CO 53, 445 P.3d 1049, cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 140 S. Ct. 876, 205 L. Ed. 2d 495 (2020). Prior to January 1, 2018, sexual expl......
-
ARTICLE 6 OFFENSES INVOLVING THE FAMILY RELATIONS
...import a sexual abuse of a child component from the legislative declaration into the statute. People in Interest of T.B., 2016 COA 151M, 452 P.3d 36, aff'd, 2019 CO 53, 445 P.3d 1049, cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 140 S. Ct. 876, 205 L. Ed. 2d 495 (2020). Prior to January 1, 2018, sexual expl......