In re People

Decision Date26 February 2015
Docket NumberCourt of Appeals No. 13CA1900
Citation2015 COA 18,371 P.3d 693
PartiesThe PEOPLE of the State of Colorado, Petitioner–Appellee, IN the INTEREST OF E.G., Juvenile–Appellant.
CourtColorado Court of Appeals
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
8 cases
  • State v. Tetu
    • United States
    • Hawaii Supreme Court
    • December 5, 2016
    ... ... These concerns are not alleviated by the Majority's "time, place, and manner" restrictions. Indeed, article I, section 6 of the Hawai'i Constitution specifically states that, "The right of the people to privacy is recognized and shall not be infringed without the showing of a compelling state interest." In recommending adoption of article I, section 6 of the Hawai'i Constitution, the drafters of this provision stated that "[p]erhaps the most important aspect of privacy is that it confers upon ... ...
  • Howard v. State
    • United States
    • Court of Special Appeals of Maryland
    • March 28, 2017
    ... ... The case cited is Webb [ v. ] Joyce Real Estate, Inc. , 108 Md.App. 512, 672 A.2d 660 [ (1996) ]. Forget about people's motivations. The issue is whether I can take all or any part of the Maryland authorities on discovery in criminal cases and interpret any of that to mean that I can compel somea property owner in this caseit's slightly even more interesting cause it's apparently not the victim's, it's herher son ... ...
  • People ex rel. E.G.
    • United States
    • Colorado Supreme Court
    • April 18, 2016
  • Larsen v. Williams
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — District of Colorado
    • November 20, 2019
    ... ... Id ... Notably, the call records SL asking Larsen, "why did you ever molest me?" and him answering, "I explained that to you once." Id ... at 78-79. Larsen was interviewed by Officer Arndt later that same day. See Larsen Interview, People's Ex., ECF No. 7. Throughout the interview, he maintained that any touching of his granddaughters was not for sexual gratification. Id ... at 76:25-77:9, 80:17-24, 84:14-16, 101:10-11, 102:17-22. He did, however, admit to touching his daughter in a sexual manner. Id ... at 88:7-91:22, 99:6-100:5 ... ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT