In re Pers. Restraint of Haghighi

Docket Number87529-4
Decision Date12 September 2013
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete case access with no limitations or restrictions

  • AI-generated case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Comprehensive legal database spanning 100+ countries and all 50 states

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Verified citations and treatment with CERT citator technology

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete case access with no limitations or restrictions

  • AI-generated case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Comprehensive legal database spanning 100+ countries and all 50 states

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Verified citations and treatment with CERT citator technology

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete case access with no limitations or restrictions

  • AI-generated case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Comprehensive legal database spanning 100+ countries and all 50 states

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Verified citations and treatment with CERT citator technology

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete case access with no limitations or restrictions

  • AI-generated case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Comprehensive legal database spanning 100+ countries and all 50 states

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Verified citations and treatment with CERT citator technology

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete case access with no limitations or restrictions

  • AI-generated case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Comprehensive legal database spanning 100+ countries and all 50 states

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Verified citations and treatment with CERT citator technology

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete case access with no limitations or restrictions

  • AI-generated case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Comprehensive legal database spanning 100+ countries and all 50 states

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Verified citations and treatment with CERT citator technology

vLex
53 cases
  • State v. Wences
    • United States
    • Washington Supreme Court
    • November 30, 2017
    ... ... In re Pers. Restraint of Eastmond, 173 Wash.2d 632, 634, 272 P.3d 188 (2012). Our holding in Eastmond adhered to the ... application of new rules of criminal procedure that this court adopted in In re Personal Restraint of St. Pierre, 118 Wash.2d 321, 823 P.2d 492 (1992), which we have applied in numerous ... Restraint of Haghighi, 178 Wash.2d 435, 441, 309 P.3d 459 (2013) ; In re Pers. Restraint of Eastmond, 173 Wash.2d 632, ... ...
  • State v. Carney
    • United States
    • Washington Court of Appeals
    • December 16, 2013
    ... ...         ¶ 23 In In re Pers. Restraint of Bratz, 101 Wash.App. 662, 5 P.3d 759 (2000), we held the notification provision under RCW ... In a recent case, In re Pers. Restraint of Haghighi, 178 Wash.2d 435, 309 P.3d 459 (2013), the Washington Supreme Court reiterated that it has ... ...
  • In re Marshall
    • United States
    • Washington Court of Appeals
    • September 24, 2019
    ... 10 Wash.App.2d 626 455 P.3d 1163 IN RE the Personal Restraint of: Jarrell Maurice MARSHALL, Petitioner. No. 49302-1-II Court of Appeals of Washington, ... In re Pers. Restraint of Haghighi , 178 Wash.2d 435, 443, 309 P.3d 459 (2013). But under Teague , a decision will apply ... ...
  • In re Tricomo
    • United States
    • Washington Court of Appeals
    • May 12, 2020
    ... 13 Wash.App.2d 223 463 P.3d 760 In the MATTER OF the Personal Restraint of Lia Yera TRICOMO, Petitioner. No. 51741-8-II Court of Appeals of Washington, Division ... In re Pers. Restraint of Haghighi , 178 Wash.2d 435, 446, 309 P.3d 459 (2013) ; see also In re Pers. Restraint of Fowler , 9 ... ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results
3 books & journal articles
  • Table of Cases
    • United States
    • Washington State Bar Association Washington Appellate Practice Deskbook (WSBA) Table of Cases
    • Invalid date
    ...(1991): 12.7(2) Hagen v. Messer, 38 Wn. App. 31, 683 P.2d 1140, review denied, 102 Wn.2d 1021 (1984): 8.22 Haghighi, In re, 178 Wn.2d 435, 309 P.3d 459 (2013): 24.5(1)(f), 24.6(1) Hagler, In re, 97 Wn.2d 818, 650 P.2d 1103 (1982), cert. denied, 478 U.S. 1020 (1986): 24.2(1), 24.2(2)(b), 24.......
  • § 24.5 Issues Cognizable and Relief Available
    • United States
    • Washington State Bar Association Washington Appellate Practice Deskbook (WSBA) Chapter 24 Personal Restraint Petitions and Post-Sentence Petitions by the Department of Corrections
    • Invalid date
    ...State v. Evans, 154 Wn.2d 438, 448-49, 114 P.3d 627, cert. denied, 546 U.S. 983 (2005); see also In re Haghighi, 178 Wn.2d 435, 457-61, 309 P.3d 459 (2013) (McCloud, J., concurring in part and dissenting in When a new decision interprets a statute rather than the state or federal constituti......
  • § 24.6 Limitations On Personal Restraint Petitions
    • United States
    • Washington State Bar Association Washington Appellate Practice Deskbook (WSBA) Chapter 24 Personal Restraint Petitions and Post-Sentence Petitions by the Department of Corrections
    • Invalid date
    ...The petitioner must establish bad faith, deception, or false assurances by the opposing party. In re Haghighi, 178 Wn.2d 435, 447-49, 309 P.3d 459 (2013). Further, unlike amendments to federal habeas petitions, amendments to personal restraint petitions cannot "relate back" to the original ......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT