In re Petition for Disciplinary Revocation of Brinley, 031419 FLSC, SC18-2052
|Party Name:||IN RE: PETITION FOR DISCIPLINARY REVOCATION OF DANIEL ROBERT BRINLEY|
|Judge Panel:||CANADY, CJ, and POLSTON, LABARGA, LAWSON, LAGOA, LUCK, and MUNIZ, JJ, concur|
|Case Date:||March 14, 2019|
|Court:||Supreme Court of Florida|
Lower Tribunal No(s).: 2019-50, 354(15F-FDR)
The uncontested amended petition for disciplinary revocation, as provided by Rule 3-7.12, Rules Regulating the Florida Bar, with leave to seek readmission after five years, is granted subject to the continuing jurisdiction of this Court. See Florida Bar v. Ross, 732 So.2d 1037, 1040-42 (Fla. 1998). Disciplinary revocation is tantamount to disbarment. Florida Bar v. Hale, 762 So.2d 515 (Fla. 2000). The disciplinary revocation shall be effective thirty days from the date of this order so that petitioner can close out his practice and protect the interests of existing clients. If petitioner notifies this Court in writing that he is no longer practicing and does not need the thirty days to protect existing clients, this Court will enter an order making the revocation effective immediately. Petitioner shall fully comply with Rule Regulating the Florida Bar 3-5.1(h). In addition, petitioner shall accept no new business from the date this order is filed until he is readmitted.
Judgment is entered for The Florida Bar, 651 East Jefferson...
To continue readingFREE SIGN UP