In re Petition of Sun Cha Tom
| Decision Date | 18 December 1968 |
| Docket Number | No. 33374.,33374. |
| Citation | 294 F. Supp. 791 |
| Parties | In re Petition for Naturalization of SUN CHA TOM. |
| Court | U.S. District Court — District of Hawaii |
Petitioner, a native and national of the Republic of Korea, seeks citizenship under section 319(b) of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (8 U.S.C. § 1430(b)). In essence this permits the naturalization of an alien who meets all other eligibility requirements if he or she establishes an intention in good faith, upon naturalization, to reside abroad with his or her United States citizen spouse and to take up residence in the United States immediately upon termination of the employment abroad of such citizen spouse.
Petitioner's spouse is a citizen of the United States and is currently serving in Vietnam as a member of the Armed Forces of the United States.
Petitioner desires, intends, is willing, and is ready to live with her husband in Vietnam immediately after naturalization, but she is unable to do so because the United States Government does not and will not authorize her to reside with him in Vietnam during his tour of duty. She will, however, immediately after naturalization, reside in South Korea during her husband's tour of duty in Vietnam and while in Korea she does not intend to visit her husband in Vietnam. Her husband does not intend to visit the petitioner in Korea even if he is permitted by his official duties in Vietnam. However, she intends in good faith to take up residence in the United States immediately upon the termination of her husband's tour of duty in Vietnam.
The United States Government has recognized that existing world conditions create dangers to persons present or residing in areas where hostile activities are taking place, and has designated such areas as locations in which dependents of the United States Government employees and servicemen cannot reside. Vietnam has been so designated by the United States Government.
The question presented is whether the petitioner is barred from naturalization under section 319(b), supra, because, although she intends, is willing, and is ready, she is unable to reside with her citizen husband promptly upon naturalization in Vietnam because restrictions imposed by the United States Government preclude her from residing with him there.
Current section 319(b), supra, requires the petitioner, among other requirements, to take up residence within the United States immediately upon the termination of the employment abroad of the citizen spouse, and does not contain the requirement that the alien spouse must intend to join the citizen spouse abroad upon naturalization see Senate Report No. 1137, Jan. 29, 1952 (to accompany S. 2250); House Report No. 1365, Feb. 14, 1952 (to accompany H.R. 5678); Conference Report No. 2096, June 9, 1952 (to accompany H.R. 5678).
However, a Presidential report to the Congress explanatory of a proposed section 311 () stated in relevant part that the proposed section would facilitate the naturalization of spouses of certain citizens regularly stationed abroad in specified employment —spouses who, by reason of enforced absence from the United States, could not hope to meet the normal residence requirements for naturalization see Part 1, Codification of the Nationality Laws of the United States (House Committee Print—76th Cong., 1st Sess., page 28), June 13, 1938.
Consequently, it is only reasonable to conclude that, in enacting section 312, and analogous section 319(b), supra, the Congress sought to provide a remedy for this particular problem, and, therefore, intended to limit the section's benefits to a petitioner who planned to go abroad and reside with the citizen spouse during the period of the employment.
Further, it is apparent that, unless the Congress intended or contemplated that the naturalized spouse would proceed abroad and take up residence with the citizen spouse during the...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
In re Petition of LaVoie
...all dependents were forbidden. See Petition for Naturalization of Simpson, 315 F.Supp. 584 (W.D.La.1970); Petition for Naturalization of Sun Cha Tom, 294 F.Supp. 791 (D. Hawaii 1968). Quite in point for the present case is McLeod v. Peterson, 283 F.2d 180 (3rd Cir. 1960), which also involve......
-
In re Petition for Naturalization Daniele Anne Elise Rose Lavoie
...forbidden. See Petition for Naturalization of Silvia Martinez Simpson, 315 F.Supp. 584 (W.D. La. 1970); Petition for Naturalization of Sun Cha Tom, 294 F.Supp. 791 (D. Hawaii 1968). Quite in point for the present case is McLeod v. Peterson, 283 F.2d 180 (3rd Cir. 1960), which also involves ......
-
In Re Petition of Pou
...as the voluntary or willful act of the petitioner or as being in contravention of Congressional policy. See Petition for Naturalization of Sun Cha Tom, 294 F.Supp. 791 (Hawaii, 1968). Further, "* * * to deny the petitioner's naturalization would be contrary to Congressional intent in the en......
-
In re Simpson, Petition No. 2533.
...as the voluntary or willful act of the petitioner or as being in contravention of Congressional policy. See Petition for Naturalization of Sun Cha Tom, 294 F.Supp. 791 (Hawaii, 1968). The Court further finds that to deny the petitioner's naturalization would be contrary to Congressional int......