In re Petition R.W.

• Court: D.C. Court of Appeals
• Writing for the Court: PER CURIAM.
• Citation: In re Petition R.W., 91 A.3d 1020 (D.C. 2014)
• Decision Date: 29 January 2014
• Docket Number: 11–FS–1218,11–FS–1256,11–FS–1260.,Nos. 11–FS–1217,11–FS–1257,11–FS–1255,11–FS–1259,11–FS–1258,s. 11–FS–1217
• Parties: In re Petition of R.W. & A.W.; T.L., Appellant. In re TA.L.; A.H., Appellant. In re A.L.; A.H., Appellant. In re Petition of R.W. & A.W.; A.H., Appellant. In re Petition of E.A.; A.H. & E.A., Appellants.

91 A.3d 1020

In re Petition of R.W. & A.W.; T.L., Appellant. In re TA.L.; A.H., Appellant. In re A.L.; A.H., Appellant. In re Petition of R.W. & A.W.; A.H., Appellant. In re Petition of E.A.; A.H. & E.A., Appellants.

Nos. 11–FS–1217, 11–FS–1218, 11–FS–1255, 11–FS–1256, 11–FS–1257, 11–FS–1258, 11–FS–1259, 11–FS–1260.

District of Columbia Court of Appeals.

Jan. 29, 2014.

OPINION TEXT STARTS HEREBEFORE: WASHINGTON,^* Chief Judge; GLICKMAN, FISHER, BLACKBURNE–RIGSBY,^*THOMPSON, BECKWITH, EASTERLY, and McLEESE, Associate Judges; and REID,^* Senior Judge.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

On consideration of the petitions for rehearing or rehearing en banc filed by appellees R.W. and A.W. and by the Guardian ad Litem for A.L. and T.L., it is

ORDERED by the merits division ^* that the petitions for rehearing are denied; and it appearing that the majority of the judges of this court have voted to grant the petitions for rehearing en banc, it is

FURTHER ORDERED that the petitions for rehearing en banc are granted and that the opinion and judgment of August 22, 2013, are hereby vacated. It is

FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk shall schedule this matter for argument before the court sitting en banc as soon as the calendar permits. It is

FURTHER ORDERED that appellants shall file new brief(s) within 40 days from the date of...