In re Philadelphia Newspapers, LLC
| Decision Date | 10 November 2009 |
| Docket Number | Civil Action No. 09-mc-178.,Bankruptcy No. 09-11204. |
| Citation | 418 B.R. 548 |
| Parties | In re PHILADELPHIA NEWSPAPERS, LLC. |
| Court | U.S. District Court — Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
Anne Marie Aaronson, Lawrence G. McMichael, Dilworth Paxson LLP, Philadelphia, PA, for Debtor.
Andrew J. Flame, David F. Abernethy, Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP, Philadelphia, PA, for Appellees.
This is an appeal from the order of the Bankruptcy Court denying approval of bid procedures for an auction of substantially all of the Debtors' assets. The appeal presents two issues: (1) Whether the Bankruptcy Court erred in rejecting bid procedures which included a provision precluding the Debtors' secured lenders from submitting a credit bid at an auction sale contemplated by the Debtors' proposed plan of reorganization; and (2) Whether the Bankruptcy Court erred in rejecting bid procedures which contained a "break-up" fee and expense reimbursement fee to be provided to the stalking horse bidder. Due to the exigency in resolving the issue of the right of the secured lenders to credit bid in the Debtors' impending auction, the Court instructed the parties to brief only that issue for the present time, and the issue with respect to the "break-up" fee and expense reimbursement fee will be addressed subsequently.1 As such, this Memorandum will address only the first issue of this appeal.
The Court holds that under the circumstances of this case, the Bankruptcy Court erred in rejecting the proposed bid procedures on the ground that the Debtors' secured lenders had a right to credit bid under 11 U.S.C. § 1129(b)(2)(A)(iii). For the reasons that follow, the decision of the Bankruptcy Court will be reversed.
Philadelphia Newspapers, LLC and its related debtor-entities (the "Debtors") filed voluntary petitions for relief under Chapter 11 of Title 11 of the United States Code, 11 U.S.C. § 101 et seq. (the "Bankruptcy Code") on February 22, 2009.2 The Debtors' cases are being jointly administered. An Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors (the "Committee") was appointed on March 2, 2009.
The Debtors own and operate numerous print and online publications in the Philadelphia region, including the Philadelphia Inquirer, the Philadelphia Daily News, and philly.com (collectively, the "Publications"). Prior to June 2006, the Publications were owned and operated by Knight-Ridder, Inc. In June 2006, Knight-Ridder, Inc. was acquired by the McClatchy Company, which subsequently decided to divest itself of the Publications. An investor group was formed, led by Brian P. Tierney ("Tierney"), for the purpose of acquiring the Publications from the McClatchy Company. This investor group formed Philadelphia Media Holdings, LLC ("PMH"),3 which entered into an asset purchase agreement for the Publications and the related businesses for a sale price of $515 million. Since this acquisition by PMH, Tierney has served as the Debtors' CEO and holder of 6.67% of the equity in the Debtors.
In order to finance the purchase of the Publications and the related businesses, PMH borrowed approximately $295 million from a group of lenders (the "Senior Lenders")4 pursuant to a Credit and Guaranty Agreement dated as of June 29, 2006 (the "Senior Credit Agreement"), with appellees Citizens Bank of Pennsylvania acting as administrative and collateral agent. The Senior Lenders contend that the Senior Credit Agreement provides a first priority lien and security interests in substantially all of the real and personal property of the Debtors.
In the months leading up to the bankruptcy filing, the Debtors engaged in extensive negotiations with the Senior Lenders for the purpose of effectuating a consensual out-of-court restructuring. At a meeting held on November 17, 2008, to discuss restructuring alternatives, it was revealed that a representative of CIT Financial (one of the Senior Lenders) was recording the negotiations without obtaining the Debtors' prior consent, in an apparent violation of Pennsylvania law (the "Recording Incident").5 Tierney voiced his displeasure over the Recording Incident to the Senior Lenders, and the Debtors assert that they were subject to retaliatory conduct from the Senior Lenders as a result of Tierney's negative reaction to the Recording Incident. The Debtors have obtained authority from the Bankruptcy Court to retain special counsel to advise them of their rights with respect to the Recording Incident, while the Committee has been empowered by the Bankruptcy Court to investigate the Recording Incident. On August 28, 2009, following a mediation, all parties, including the Debtors, agreed to abstain from pursuing any review of the Recording Incident until January 2, 2010, in order to pursue the "big-picture" issues involved in the Debtors' cases.
As a result of the break-down in negotiations with the Senior Lenders, the Debtors were forced to file their respective bankruptcy petitions. On August 20, 2009 the Debtors filed a Joint Chapter 11 Plan (the "Plan") and accompanying disclosure statement. The Plan provides for a sale, by public auction (the "Auction"), of substantially all of the Debtors' assets, excluding certain real property that will be transferred directly to the Senior Lenders. The sale resulting from the Auction is scheduled to close on the same date that the Plan becomes effective. In conjunction with the Auction, the Debtors executed an Asset Purchase Agreement (the "Stalking Horse Agreement") with Philly Papers, LLC as the stalking horse and putative purchaser (the "Stalking Horse Bidder"). The Stalking Horse Bidder is comprised of several equity investors, including Carpenters Pension and Annuity Fund of Philadelphia and Vicinity, which owns an equity stake in PMH estimated to be approximately 30%. Bruce Toll is the Chairman and another equity investor of the Stalking Horse Bidder, who until recently owned an approximately 20% equity stake in PMH. Penn Matrix Investors, whose controlling partner is David Haas, is the third entity comprising the Stalking Horse Bidder and has never held an equity interest in PMH and does not have any prior affiliation with the Debtors.
The Plan contemplates that the Stalking Horse Bidder will pay a cash purchase price of $30 million, plus a combination of payment of certain expenses and assumption of liabilities that will yield gross proceeds to the Debtors' estates of approximately $41 million. After payment of administrative and priority claims as well as outstanding debtor-in-possession financing facility advances, the Debtors anticipate a distribution to the Senior Lenders of approximately $36 million.6 The Debtors contend that the purchase price set by the Stalking Horse Agreement represents fair market value for the Debtors' assets.
The Plan further provides for the creation of a $750,000 liquidating trust7 in favor of general unsecured trade creditors and a 3% distribution of equity interests in the Stalking Horse (or other successful bidder) to holders of unsecured prepetition claims other than general trade creditors.8 A key component of the Plan is that the distribution provided for each class of creditors, other than the Senior Lenders, is not contingent on the outcome of the Auction and all proceeds of a cash overbid will flow directly to the Senior Lenders. Thus, each dollar above the bid submitted by the Stalking Horse Bidder resulting from the Auction will go directly toward satisfying the Senior Lenders' secured claim.
On August 28, 2009, the Debtors filed a motion with the Bankruptcy Court seeking authorization of certain bid procedures (the "Bid Procedures") to be employed in conjunction with the Stalking Horse Agreement and Auction. The key terms of the Bid Procedures for purposes of this appeal are that all bids submitted must be in cash and that the...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
United States v. Louisiana, Case No. 3:11-cv-00470-JWD-RLB
...stated, "[a]dherence to the plain meaning rule is not simply a matter of judicial craftsmanship" but of duty. In re Phila. Newspapers, LLC, 418 B.R. 548, 558 (E.D. Pa. 2009). And borrowing adjectives and adverbs cannot but offend it.b. Defendants' Insufficient Counters Conceding the absence......
-
In Re Philadelphia
...to generate fair market value at the Auction, thereby preventing them from receiving the indubitable equivalent of their claim." Dist. Ct. slip op. at 574-75. Although the Lenders contend that approach here is anomalous, the case law favors the Debtors. While the reasoning in the myriad cas......
-
United States v. Louisiana
..."[a]dherence to the plain meaning rule is not simply a matter of judicial craftsmanship" but of duty. In re Phila. Newspapers, LLC , 418 B.R. 548, 558 (E.D.Pa.2009). And borrowing adjectives and adverbs cannot but offend it.b. Defendants' Insufficient CountersConceding the absence of such q......
-
Rubin & Rubin, P.A. v. Office of the U.S. Tr. (In re NNN 400 Capitol Ctr. 16 LLC)
...& Rubin did not raise either argument before the Bankruptcy Court, those arguments are waived. (See Lender Br. 29 (citing In re Phila. , 418 B.R. at 575 n. 27 )). Even assuming these arguments were not waived, they are rejected.1. Sanctions Under Bankruptcy Rule 9011 The Bankruptcy Court co......
-
Seventh Circuit Affirms Bankruptcy Court Ruling That Sale Of Assets Through Plan May Not Use 'Indubitable Equivalent' Standard To Prevent Secured Creditors From Credit Bidding
...See In re Philadelphia Newspapers, LLC, 2009 WL 3242292, at *10 (Bankr. E.D.Pa. October 8, 2009); In re Philadelphia Newspapers, LLC, 418 B.R. 548, 566 n.19 (E.D.Pa. 2009); Philadelphia Newspapers at 318 11 Philadelphia Newspapers at 325. 12 Id. at 328-331. 13 Id. at 331-334. 14 Id. at 336-......
-
Merriam Mikhail, Extra! Extra!: Philadelphia Newspapers Jeopardizes Credit Bidding
...2009 WL 3242292 (Bankr.E.D. Pa. Feb. 22, 2009); see also In re Phila. Newspapers, LLC, 599 F.3d 298, 301 n.1 (3d Cir. 2010), aff’g418 B.R. 548 (E.D. Pa. 2009).In re Phila. Newspapers, 599 F.3d at 301.Id.Id.6 Id. at 301–02.holders.7 Under the debtors’ proposed plan, following a successful st......
-
The Boundaries of "team" Production of Corporate Governance
...note 51; Douglas G. Baird, Lessons from the Automobile Reorganizations, 4 J. Legal Analysis 271 (2012). 53. In re Phila. Newspapers, LLC, 418 B.R. 548, 552 (E.D. Pa. 2009), aff'd, 599 F.3d 298 (3d Cir. 2010). 54. Credit bidding allowed a lending syndicate to take actions in a bankruptcy to ......