In re Pinto's Naturalization, 680004.

Decision Date28 June 1957
Docket NumberNo. 680004.,680004.
Citation152 F. Supp. 892
PartiesPetition for Naturalization of Antonio PINTO, Jr., Petitioner.
CourtU.S. District Court — Southern District of New York

Steinberg, Friedman, Blau & Isler, New York City, Louis Steinberg, New York City, of counsel, for petitioner.

Howard Cohen, Naturalization Examiner, New York City,

DAWSON, District Judge.

This petition for naturalization is opposed on the ground that the applicant, a Portuguese national, is ineligible for citizenship because during World War II he disqualified himself by filing an application to be relieved from military service in the armed forces of the United States on the basis of alienage.1

The Court finds the following facts:

Petitioner, who is a single male, 49 years old, filed a petition for citizenship in this court on September 19, 1956. Petitioner was admitted to the United States for permanent residence on March 6, 1940 and has resided in this country since that date. In October 1940 he registered with his local draft board in Ossining, New York, as required by the Selective Service and Training Act of 1940.2 In January 1942 he received a notice from the draft board classifying him as 4-C, i. e., an alien who had not filed a declaration of intention.

In January 1942 petitioner, who was then employed as a gardener, received a communication from his local draft board. The petitioner states that he could not read or understand English and he asked a Portuguese friend to explain the contents of the communication to him. The friend told him that it concerned military service and that it was necessary to fill out and sign some papers, and that he, the friend, would go with him to the local draft board and assist him. He testified that he had previously told his friend that he was willing to serve in the United States armed forces but was concerned about whether an allotment from his pay could be sent to his widowed mother, residing in Portugal, who was dependent on him for support. He testified that when he arrived at the local board his friend had a conversation in English with one of the officials of the draft board and then gave petitioner a paper to sign, saying that this paper would take care of his mother. He thereupon executed the document, DSS Form 301, which was an application for relief from military service on the ground of alienage and which contained the statement: "I understand that the making of this application to be relieved of such liability will debar me from becoming a citizen of the United States." The petitioner testified that he did not understand the document because of his inability to read or understand English and that he believed the paper was an application for an allotment to his mother in the event of his acceptance into the armed forces. The document was dated July 29, 1942. As a result of the execution of this document the registrant was relieved from military training and service and was classified 4-C. The files of the local draft board show that the petitioner thereafter, and prior to the early part of 1944, had been in communication with his draft board to find out whether, if he was to go into the armed services, his allotment would be payable to his family in Portugal. The local board wrote to State headquarters with reference to petitioner on January 19, 1944, stating in part: "We would like to find out whether, if he were to go into the armed services, his allotment would be payable to his family in Portugal." On January 27, 1944, the local board wrote to the Treasury Department with reference to the petitioner, stating in part: "He wants assurance that if he joins the armed forces of the United States, his dependents will receive his allotment." The draft board files also indicate that a letter written in early 1944 by the petitioner, stated:

"I have had some correspondence with your board in reference to being accepted into the armed services if I could be sure my family in Portugal would receive my allotment from the Government."

The sequence of this correspondence is such that it seems petitioner was making his induction into the armed forces contingent upon the assurance that his family in Portugal would receive his allotment. This evidence indicates an awareness on the part of the petitioner that the form he signed in 1942 was not to get a family allotment and was not, as he testified, preliminary to his imminent induction.

On October 23, 1943, an amendment to the Servicemen's Dependents Allowance Act of 1942 became effective and liberalized the provisions of the Act so that allotments by alien enlisted men could be sent to their families.3

On February 3, 1944, petitioner signed DSS Form 165, which is an application for voluntary induction, and was immediately classified 1-A. He was then given notice to report for a physical examination, which he did. He was rejected on this physical examination and classified 4-F. The report of the physical examination indicated that the petitioner spoke Portuguese as well as some English but that he was illiterate and suffering from a severe psychoneurosis. It was because of this severe psychoneurosis that he was deemed disqualified for military service. He was then classified as 4-F.

Thereafter, on September 11, 1946, petitioner executed an affidavit before the Naturalization Examiner in which he stated:

"I reside at Millwood, N. Y. I filed a form with the draft board asking that I be relieved from military service because of my Portuguese citizenship. I did this because my family in Portugal needed my support. I asked the draft board whether the Army would send them an allotment. She did not know and I could not let my family starve.
"Later on, I learned that allotments are sent to Portugal, and I then went to the draft board and was sent down for induction, but was classified 4-F."

Petitioner contends that he did not "knowingly and intentionally" waive his rights to citizenship when he signed and filed the application to be relieved from military service, because he was at that time illiterate and did not understand the meaning of the document, and that he had been misled by his friend who accompanied him into thinking that the form he signed was merely an application for an allotment for his mother. This friend was not produced as a witness. It was stated that he is now out of the country.

Petitioner testified at the hearing before me and produced several witnesses who swore to his reputation for veracity and honesty.

Petitioner's testimony was that because of his lack of understanding of the English language he did not know that the...

To continue reading

Request your trial
2 cases
  • United States v. Hoellger
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Second Circuit
    • January 13, 1960
    ... ...        The district court, in an unreported decision, granted the petition for naturalization of appellee, Otto Hoellger, and the Government has appealed ...         The facts are ... ...
  • Matter of R---- E----
    • United States
    • U.S. DOJ Board of Immigration Appeals
    • June 18, 1962
    ... ... The final decision regarding your naturalization will remain solely with the competent naturalization courts." ...         The Service ... ...

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT