In re Pittock's Will
Decision Date | 26 July 1921 |
Citation | 199 P. 633,102 Or. 159 |
Parties | IN RE PITTOCK'S WILL. v. PRICE ET AL. LEADBETTER |
Court | Oregon Supreme Court |
Appeal from Circuit Court, Multnomah County; George Tazwell, Judge.
Proceeding by Caroline P. Leadbetter against O. L. Price, as executor and O. L. Price and another, as trustees under the will of Henry L. Pittock, deceased, to contest the validity of the will. From a decree upholding the will, the petitioner appeals. Affirmed.
This is a proceeding to contest the validity of the will of Henry L Pittock, deceased, on the petition of his daughter, Caroline P. Leadbetter, in which the relief desired is to set aside annul, and cancel the testamentary document, with a view of distributing the estate according to the statute of descents as in a case of intestacy. The original petition stated the death of the deceased; that at the time thereof he was a resident and inhabitant of Multnomah county, Or., having real and personal property therein; gives the names and residences of the heirs; and avers that about February 17, 1919, a writing purporting to be his will was admitted to probate. The petition then goes on to allege that the will mentioned "should be set aside and annulled for the following reasons," among others these:
The circuit court, in which this proceeding was instituted, on motion of the proponents of the will, struck out paragraphs (c), (d), (e), above quoted, whereupon the contestant filed an amended petition. The allegations about the death of the decedent, the heirs, and the presentation and admission to probate of the will are substantially the same as in the original pleading. It goes on to state with a wealth of verbiage that the trustees were intimately connected with the deceased as confidential advisers; that at the time of the execution of the will the decedent was 81 years of age; that the trustees named therein had acquired great influence over him; and that, conspiring, intending, and devising to secure large power, influence, emoluments, salaries, and commissions as executors of the last will and testament and as trustees of his estate, amounting approximately to $8,000,000, the individuals named as trustees so persuaded and overcame the will, free agency, volition, and judgment of the deceased that their will was substituted for his, and the paper mentioned, for the reasons foregoing, was not and did not represent the will of the decedent.
It is averred also, in substance, that the trustees and others to the petitioner unknown unduly influenced and induced the deceased to keep secret the fact that he had signed the paper. The resultant of all the allegations of the amended petition is concentrated in the eleventh paragraph thereof, reading thus:
"That said provisions of said will creating said trust and conveying to said O. L. Price and C. A. Morden all of the estate of decedent, and giving to said persons unrestricted and unlimited discretion as to the accumulation of the income arising from the estate of deceased, and keeping intact the corpus thereof during the period of 20 years as provided in said paper writing, or selling the assets of said estate and making distribution thereof and the income arising therefrom within said period of 20 years, and failing to specify with sufficient certainty the beneficiaries of said trust attempted to be created by said paper writing, and directing the said persons to vote for themselves during the period of said alleged trust and to elect and retain said C. A. Morden as manager of the Oregonian Publishing Company, are illegal and void, against public policy, and in contravention of the statutes of the state of Oregon."
It is alleged that the decedent was ignorant of the legal effect of the provisions of the will, and that he relied upon the representations of the trustees and did not seek independent advice; that he would not have executed the will or created the trust mentioned if he had known or been advised that the writing in the particulars mentioned, or in any of them, was illegal and void. The prayer is to the effect that the will be set aside and canceled and an administrator be appointed to take charge of the estate. A copy of the will is attached to the petition, marked Exhibit A, and reads as follows:
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Jackson v. United States National Bank, Portland, Ore.
...before it—possesses only a limited and statutory probate jurisdiction, without general legal or equitable power. Cf: In re Pittock's Will, 1921, 102 Or. 159, 199 P. 633, 202 P. 216, 17 A.L.R. 218; 102 Or. 47, 201 P. 428; Leadbetter v. Price, 1921, 103 Or. 222, 202 P. 104; In re Johnson's Es......
-
Alderman v. Alderman
...S.E. 412, 31 L. R. A. (N. S.) 1186, 21 Ann. Cas. 1287, and is quoted with approval in Re Pittock's Will, an Oregon case, reported in 102 Or. 159, 199 P. 633, 202 P. 216, 17 A. L. R. 218. fact the opinion in the Pittock Case adopts the second paragraph of the syllabus of the Carnagie Trust C......
-
Alderman v. Alderman
...68 S. E. 412, 31 L. R. A. (N. S.) 1186, 21 Ann. Cas. 1287, and is quoted with approval in Re Pittock's Will, an Oregon case, reported in 102 Or. 159, 199 P. 633, 202 P. 216. 17 A. L. R. 218. In fact the opinion in the Pittock Case adopts the second paragraph of the syllabus of the Carnagie ......
-
Closset v. Burtchaell
... ... Burtchaell ... and another, as executor, executrix, and trustees under the ... will of Joseph Closset, deceased. From decree of dismissal, ... plaintiffs appeal. Reversed and rendered ... [230 P. 556] ... ...