In Re: Raejean Bonham, dba World Plus

Decision Date04 October 2000
Docket Number98-36109,SPEAR-SHIPLEY,98-36205,98-36086,Nos. 98-36081,99-35046,WYLIE-ECHEVERRIA,A,98-36091,98-36089,98-36083,98-36108,VANDER-KOOY,98-36093,WYLIE-ECHEVERRI,s. 98-36081
Parties(9th Cir. 2000) In re: RAEJEAN BONHAM, aka Jean Bonham, aka Jeannie Bonham, dba World Plus, Inc., an Alaska corporation and ATLANTIC PACIFIC FUNDING CORPORATION, a Nevada corporation, Debtors. THOMAS ALEXANDER; GAY ALEXANDER; ALEXANDER RENTALS; DEBBIE BAILEY; WAYNE BAILEY; SONDRA BAKER; HARRY BAKER; LISA BAKER; LLOYD BEADLE; JAMES BENNETT; MARIA BENNETT; THOMAS BOYD; SHEILA BOYD; LESLIE BOYD; JEREMY BOYD; JILL CAMERON; RAYMOND CAMERON; JOSEPH CAMPBELL; DENNIS CARY; MARVEL CARY; GENE MCCLANAHAN; FARRELL CHRISTENSEN; BRENT COOK; JOLANDA COOK; HEATHER COOK; MELANIE COOK; JIM DAVIS; ROXIE DAVIS; ROGER DELANEY; DOROTHY DELANEY; MARY BETH DIETHELM; NATHAN DIETHELM; ROBERT DUNN; NANCY DUTTON; LINETTE FINSTAD; RICHARD KEDROWSKI; MARY FLICKINGER; ALLEN FUSS; RAYETTE FUSS; IGNATIUS FUSS; JULIA FUSS; TOM FUSS; ARBARA FUSS; VELESTA FUSCO; PAULINE FUSCO; TEO FUSCO; JACQUELINE GOLDRICK; VICTOR GUNN; MARY GUNN; CYNTHIA HACHEZ; MIKE HACHEZ; GARY HALMSTAD; RAYNA HAMM; JOHN R. HILTENBRAND, JR.; GEORGE R. HORNER; JOANN HORNER; GEORGE L. HORNER; JUDITH HORNER; HORNER TRUST; RUSS JOHNSON; BECKY JOHNSON; ROBERT KARLEN; KAREN KARLEN; PAUL KELLER; CARLA KELLER; LEE KENASTON, GERALD KENASTON; JANENE KENASTON; KAREN KENASTON; DON KRATZER, JANICE LARSON, GRETA LINDLEY; KENNETH LINDLEY, LYNN MARVIN; ED MAYNARD; MAUREEN MAYNARD; HEIDI MORTON; LARRY NAUTA; SHERRY NAUTA; LEONARD NELSON; JEANETTE NELSON; ELMER OSTBLOOM; MARGARET STBLOOM; WILLIAM PASCOE; RUTH (SHERWOOD) PUGH; DEE RICHIE; ELIZABETH RICHIE; PAUL RITCHIE; BEN RITCHIE; BRADLEY RITCHIE; BARTHOLOMEW RITCHIE; BURTON RITCHIE; RACHAEL RITCHIE; REBECCA RITCHIE; ROXANNE RITCHIE; PAUL ROBINSON; HARRY SINZ; VICKI VICKERY; SALLY ROSS; MARY SCOTT; JAMES SISK; WAYNE TAYLOR; JOHN THORNTON; LINDSEY THORNTON; CARL TOMPKINS; ALANE TOMPKINS; VERLIN TOMPKINS; LINDA TOMPKINS; SCOTT TOMPKINS; CATHERINE TOMPKINS; CHARLES TRAVIS; CLIFFORD TRAVIS; BARBARA TRAVIS; EVERETT TRAVIS; TIM WALLIS; MARY WALLIS; RYAN WALRATH; CAROL WALRATH; CRAIG ZOET; ROBERT ZOET, A
CourtU.S. Court of Appeals — Ninth Circuit

To continue reading

Request your trial
205 cases
  • In re Catholic Bishop of Spokane
    • United States
    • U.S. Bankruptcy Court — Eastern District of Washington
    • August 26, 2005
    ...entity may have a legal existence separate from the debtor, that does not necessarily defeat substantive consolidation. In re Bonham, 229 F.3d 750, 763-765 (9th Cir.2000). Nor does the fact that title to real estate is held in the name of non-debtor preclude a determination that the debtor ......
  • Cap Call, LLC v. Foster (In re Shoot the Moon, LLC)
    • United States
    • U.S. Bankruptcy Court — District of Montana
    • September 10, 2021
    ...Feb. 19, 2014) ; In re Titanium Dioxide Antitrust Litig. , 962 F. Supp. 2d 840, 862 (D. Md. 2013).71 Cf. Alexander v. Compton (In re Bonham) , 229 F.3d 750, 765-67 (9th Cir. 2000) (outlining factors that could support substantive consolidation of separate legal persons in bankruptcy).72 See......
  • In re 1Point Solutions, LLC, Case No. 06-5400 (Bankr. M.D. Tenn. 6/15/2009)
    • United States
    • U.S. Bankruptcy Court — Middle District of Tennessee
    • June 15, 2009
    ...are used to pay artificially high returns to the initial investors, with the goal of attracting more investors." In re Bonham, 229 F.3d 750, 759 n.1 (9th Cir. 2000). 9. Trustee's Statement of Material Facts & Docs., Ex. 1 at 16 (hereinafter, "Stokes Plea 10. The parties do not dispute this ......
  • In re Derivium Capital, LLC
    • United States
    • U.S. Bankruptcy Court — District of South Carolina
    • December 22, 2006
    ...75 (Bankr.D.Alaska 1998) (consolidating the estate of a non-debtor with that of the debtor nunc pro tune) (aff'd Alexander v. Compton (In re Bonham), 229 F.3d 750 (9th Cir.2000)). This Court has previously utilized the test adopted in the Second Circuit to determine whether to substantively......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 firm's commentaries
  • Lenders Feel the Sting of Substantive Consolidation
    • United States
    • Mondaq United States
    • December 21, 2004
    ...v. Southern Motel Assoc., Ltd., 935 F.2d 245 (11th Cir. 1991). In re Augie/Restivo Baking Co., 860 F.2d 515 (2d Cir. 1988). In re Bonham, 229 F.3d 750 (9th Cir. The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about......
18 books & journal articles
  • Joshua M. Silverstein, Hiding in Plain View: a Neglected Supreme Court Decision Resolves the Debate Over Non-debtor Releases in Chapter 11 Reorganizations
    • United States
    • Emory University School of Law Emory Bankruptcy Developments Journal No. 23-1, March 2007
    • Invalid date
    ...2 COLLIER ¶ 105.04[2] ("Substantive consolidation is the merging of the assets and claims of two or more estates."). 554 See In re Bonham, 229 F.3d 750, 764 (9th Cir. 2000) ("Substantive consolidation 'enabl[es] a bankruptcy court to disregard separate corporate entities, to pierce their co......
  • The Inequities of Equitable Subordination.
    • United States
    • American Bankruptcy Law Journal Vol. 96 No. 1, January 2022
    • January 1, 2022
    ...579, 585 (11th Cir. 2018) (quoting Pepper while affirming denial of discharge to debtors who fraudulently destroyed assets); In re Bonham, 229 F.3d 750, 763 (9th Cir. 2008) (citing Pepper to support finding of bankruptcy court's power of substantive consolidation); cf. In re Combustion Eng'......
  • William C. Blasses, Redefining Into Reality: Substantive Consolidation of Parent Corporations and Subsidiaries
    • United States
    • Emory University School of Law Emory Bankruptcy Developments Journal No. 24-2, June 2008
    • Invalid date
    ...Substantive Consolidation: Getting Back to Basics, 14 AM. BANKR. INST. L. REV. 1, 40-41 (2006). 107 Alexander v. Compton (In re Bonham), 229 F.3d 750, 765, 771 (9th Cir. 2000) (finding that substantive consolidation had "survived enactment of the Bankruptcy Code" and affirming "the order of......
  • A Bankruptcy Litigation Framework for Series Llc Eligibility, Property of the Estate and Substantive Consolidation
    • United States
    • Emory University School of Law Emory Bankruptcy Developments Journal No. 35-1, March 2019
    • Invalid date
    ...2010).242. Id. (quoting Eastgroup Properties v. S. Motel Assoc., Ltd., 935 F.2d 245, 249 (11th Cir. 1991)).243. Id. (quoting In re Bonham, 229 F.3d 750, 764 (9th Cir. 2000)). 244. Collier on Bankruptcy, supra note 230.245. E.g., J. Maxwell Tucker, Substantive Consolidation: The Cacophony Co......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT