In re Rionda

Decision Date16 June 1908
PartiesIn re RIONDA.
CourtU.S. District Court — Southern District of New York

Henry L. Stimson and Hugh Govern, Jr., for the United States.

William Y. Clarke, for petitioner.

ADAMS, District judge.

The petitioner, Harriet Rionda, seeks to become a citizen of this country by naturalization. It appears that she was born in the Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland. In 1889, she was married in this country to her present husband, Manuel Rionda, then, and now, a subject of the King of Spain. She admits that her husband has no intention of applying for American citizenship.

The question is whether an alien woman dwelling in this country and otherwise qualified, can, in the circumstances mentioned, be naturalized under our laws.

The decisions upon the subject have not been uniform, but the weight of authority establishes that the nationality of a wife is controlled by that of her husband. The subject has been discussed and the various decisions collected in Van Dyne on Naturalization, 51-53, inclusive.

It is explicitly provided by the United States laws:

'Sec. 3. That any American woman who marries a foreigner shall take the nationality of her husband. At the termination of the marital relation she may resume her American citizenship, if abroad, by registering as an American citizen within one year with a consul of the United States, or by returning to reside in the United States, or, if residing in the United States at the termination of the marital relation, by continuing to reside therein. ' Act March 2, 1907, c. 2534, 34 Stat. 1228 (U.S. Comp. St. Supp. 1907, p. 381).

If, therefore, the applicant had been an American woman, she would have taken the nationality of her foreign husband, and it is difficult to see how a foreign born married woman is in a position to acquire the rights given by naturalization.

The application must be denied.

To continue reading

Request your trial
1 cases
  • In re Vasicek
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Eastern District of Missouri
    • March 12, 1921
    ... ... (United States v. Peterson, 182 F. 289, 104 C.C.A ... 571; In re O'Dea (C.C.) 158 F. 703; United ... States v. Daly, 32 App.D.C. 525; In re Giaquinto ... (D.C.) 230 F. 1004); that the petitioner labors under no ... legal disability in seeking citizenship (In re Rionda ... (D.C.) 164 F. 368; United States v. Cohen, 179 ... F. 834, 103 C.C.A. 28, 29 L.R.A. (N.S.) 829; Mackenzie v ... Hare, 239 U.S. 299, 36 Sup.Ct. 106, 60 L.Ed. 297, Ann ... Cas. 1916E, 645); that he actually resided, where petition is ... filed in a state court, in the county in which the ... ...

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT