In re Rodebaugh, Bankruptcy No. 181-00117

Decision Date19 June 1981
Docket NumberAdv. No. 181-0057.,Bankruptcy No. 181-00117
Citation12 BR 81
CourtU.S. Bankruptcy Court — District of Maine
PartiesIn re Ralph Ernest RODEBAUGH and Marcelle Louise Rodebaugh, Debtors. The SAVINGS & LOAN ASSOCIATION OF BANGOR, Plaintiff, v. Ralph Ernest RODEBAUGH and Marcelle Louise Rodebaugh and Gerald S. Cope, as Chapter 13 Trustee, Defendants.

William Conte, Gary M. Growe, Conte & Growe, Bangor, Me., for debtors.

Michael S. Haenn, Mitchell & Stearns, Bangor, Me., for plaintiff.

Gerald S. Cope, Portland, Me., Chapter 13 Trustee.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

CONRAD K. CYR, Bankruptcy Judge.

The plaintiff holds a valid and enforceable first real estate mortgage on the two-family residence owned by the defendants (debtors), which has a fair market value of $35,000 and upon which is owed in excess of $43,000. The debtors propose to pay $225 per month under a chapter 13 plan yet to be confirmed over the objection of the plaintiff. Plaintiff demands relief from stay in order to continue state court foreclosure proceedings commenced prior to the filing of the chapter 13 petition. The mortgage is in default; nine monthly payments are in arrears, as are municipal taxes (constituting a first lien on the real estate) and sewage charges. The real estate has declined in value in recent years. The only protection of the interest of the plaintiff proffered by the debtors is that plaintiff retain its lien awaiting future mortgage payments to be made outside the plan by the debtors, and accumulations under the chapter 13 plan sufficient to cure the existing delinquency, following the satisfaction of prior tax liens and costs of administration.

The debtors have no equity in the subject real estate, which is worth from $7,000 to $9,000 less than the amounts due plaintiff and a tax lien claimant. The plaintiff waives any and all deficiency claims against the debtors and their chapter 13 estate, provided foreclosure is allowed to proceed. The $311 monthly mortgage payment, which does not cover real estate taxes and sewage assessments, exceeds the cost of rental housing adequate for the debtors' needs.

I conclude that the encumbered real estate is not necessary to an effective adjustment of debts in these circumstances.1 Upon their relinquishment of title to real estate in which they have no equity, the almost immediate solvency and financial rehabilitation of the debtors would be virtually assured, by reason of the prompt satisfaction and forgiveness of approximately...

To continue reading

Request your trial
1 cases

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT