In re Rodgers

Decision Date22 April 1903
PartiesIn re RODGERS. [1]
CourtU.S. Court of Appeals — Seventh Circuit

Newton Wyeth and Joseph E. Paden, for appellant.

Orville Peckham, Samuel Kerr, and Wallace Hickman, for appellee.

Alexander Rodgers was adjudged a bankrupt on May 8, 1901, and on that day the Chicago Title & Trust Company was appointed receiver and subsequently trustee, of the property and estate of the bankrupt, and took possession of the estate, including the property hereinafter mentioned. The bankrupt was a dealer in seeds, having his place of business upon the premises Nos 220 to 230 Johnson street, in the city of Chicago. These premises, consisting of the south half of the basement, the north half of the south half of the second, third, fourth fifth, and sixth floors, with the right of way to the south elevator from the railroad platform by way of the east door on platform, and by way of entrance on alley, and the right of way to go upon the elevator, and the right to ship in and out by wagons by the front door, by chute, and by the rear entrance, as described, were leased by him from one Hascall from January 10, 1899, to April 30, 1902, at a monthly rental of $200. On November 28, 1899, he also leased until April 30 1902, the south one-fourth of the fifth and sixth floors, at an additional rental of $50 per month. So that after that date he had the whole of the south half of the fifth and sixth floors, the north half of the south half of the second, third, and fourth floors, and the whole of the south half of the basement; the first floor being vacant, and used as a passageway. A wooden partition separated the south half from the north half of the floors of the building, the latter being occupied by another tenant. The entrance was from the west front of the building on Johnson street to the main floor, and thence stairways at the south end of the building ran from each floor to the floor above and to the basement. The front of the south half of the second floor was partitioned into an office, and was occupied by the bankrupt. There were also machinery and appliances and a freight elevator for the handling of seed, and on certain floors were bins with cleaning machinery for cleaning and grading seed. The seed was usually received from railroad cars into the basement; thence elevated to the top floor, if to be dumped or cleaned; and was usually received and shipped in bags, most of the business being in car-load lots of about 250 bags, and when stored on any floor was usually in car-load lots. The usual pile or lot was made up in two tiers of bags lying horizontally, the ends of the bags of one tier abutting the ends of the bags of another, with five or six bags piled up in front against the two tiers. These piles were about 16 feet long and 6 to 7 feet high. The building was known as 'mill construction'; that is, the timbers were exposed posts supported by joists and girders. The various floors were known as divisions from the sixth down, A, B, C, D, E, and F; the latter being the basement. Depending from the ceiling girders or joists were wooden signs on which were painted 'Div.,' with the letters 'A' 'B,' etc., indicating the floor, and 'Sec.,' with a number thereafter, as 1, 2, 3, etc., to indicate a section, so called, of the floor. The floors were large open floors, 50 by 90 or 60 by 100 feet, and had no bins for the separate storage of seed, and had no partitions dividing the floor space. The boundary lines of 'sections' were imaginary lines, the signs being put up by Rodgers upon his leasing the premises; and there was no division of sections on the second floor, where a large part of the seed now in controversy was located.

The National Storage Company is a corporation, incorporated under the laws of the state of Illinois on December 29, 1886. It was authorized to carry on a general warehouse business, to receive for safe-keeping or storage general merchandise, grain, etc.; to take charge of and perform the duty of paying freight charges, duties, etc., on bonding, receiving, landing, hauling, and delivering such property deposited, or intended to be deposited with such corporation; to issue receipts or certificates for goods and personal property to the owner or owners thereof when such goods and personal property 'have been received, are on the premises, or under the control of the said corporation at the time of issuing such receipts or certificates.'

On August 25, 1900, the National Storage Company and the bankrupt entered into the following written agreement:

'Proposal for Warehousing.

'Office of National Storage Company,

'Chicago, Ills., August 25th, 1900.

'Mr. Alexander Rodgers,

'#220 Johnson Street, Chicago, Illinois.

'Dear Sir: 1. The National Storage Company hereby proposes to issue its storage warrants to the order of yourself or to such order as the acceptor hereof may hereafter direct, upon personal property consisting in part of Field Seeds to be stored in the premises known as #220-#230, Johnson Street, Chicago, Illinois.

'2. All of the above named premises, or such portions thereof as may from time to time be required, shall as and when required be leased to the National Storage Company. Said premises are to be designated as National Storage Company's Warehouse Premises Number 281.

'3. Rates, Terms and Conditions which shall govern the storage of property or issue warrants under this proposal are as follows:

'On property valued at $10,000 or less, the charge for the first calendar month or fraction will be $7.50, for each succeeding month or fraction $7.50, and for each additional $1,000 or fraction, the rate will be $.75 per month.
'All traveling expenses and other incidental expenditures incurred while conducting the business under this proposal, and all costs of placing property in store, such as measuring, weighing, tallying, surveying, platting or drafting, etc., will be added to above charges. A certified memorandum must be rendered, showing market value of the property placed in store on which storage charges are to be based.
'4. Substantial fences, gates, partitions, doors or other forms of enclosure, for enclosing or protecting property, for which warrants of this Company have been or may hereafter be issued, shall be constructed and kept in repair by acceptor hereof, and if not so constructed or repaired upon request, this Company is hereby authorized to forthwith construct or repaid same, and place any cost therefor as a charge against the property enclosed or protected thereby.

'5. Any and every lease executed in pursuance of this proposal shall, upon written notice delivered to the National Storage Company by the acceptor hereof, be duly cancelled and the premises surrendered only when and after all warrants issued under, upon or by reason of any and every application executed by such acceptor, shall have been delivered to this Company under terms and conditions of this proposal and said warrants.

'6. It is understood unless otherwise provided in writing, that this proposition under its terms contemplates, that the quantity of grain which may be received for storage, shall be determined by a measured bushel standard. Grain will be received by weight and so accounted for, charges for weighing by this Company's representative to be paid by acceptor hereof.

'7. Storage charges are due and payable as elected by this Company, at time of delivery, monthly, or at close of each calendar quarter. It is provided, that if for any cause delivery of property be made on which storage charges have not been paid, the remaining property will be held liable for same and all other charges which may have accrued. The costs for delivery of property when attended by superintendence of this Company are not rated as storage charges. Such cost and other contingent expenses will form basis for additional charge. Surrender of warrants and payment of charges to date of such surrender will not cease or terminate storage charges until property has been accepted, and Release Permits have been signed by party authorized to receive the property surrendered, and permits have been received at office of this Company.

'8. Should increased cost, or additional services, or risk, in reference to said property or warrants, be incurred by reason of the sale or pledge of the warrants, and the property, covered thereby, then the rates on each warrant, shall be such as shall be fixed by this Company, not exceeding the rates named therein.

'9. The services of a capable person satisfactory to this Company must be provided to represent its interests, such person shall also be acceptable to any surety company from whom indemnity bond may be asked in adequate amount, and commensurate with value of property received by this company and covered by its warrants. To defray cost of bond and services of such custodian a charge against the property will be made, unless otherwise adjusted.

'10. This Company reserves the right to recall and issue new warrant, for remainder of any warrant having three or more endorsements thereon of property delivered therefrom, also to recall and issue new warrant for remainder of any warrant, at expiration of one year from its date, having one or more endorsements thereon of property delivered therefrom, provided that in either case the guarantee afforded by endorsers is not affected thereby.

'11. It is understood that while the identity of each respective lot of property received by this Company, shall always be maintained, any surplus remaining after the delivery of any certain lot or lots may be retained by the Storage Company, until all charges are paid, and all warrants issued in pursuance of this proposal shall have been surrendered and satisfied.
'12. It is to be
...

To continue reading

Request your trial
38 cases
  • Clay v. Waters
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Eighth Circuit
    • April 18, 1910
    ... ... White v. Schloerb, 178 U.S. 542, 20 Sup.Ct. 1007, 44 ... L.Ed. 1157; Whitney v. Wenman, 198 U.S. 539, 25 ... Sup.Ct. 778, 49 L.Ed. 1157; In re Rochford, 124 F ... 182, 184, 59 C.C.A. 388, 390; In re Granite City ... Bank, 137 F. 818, 821, 70 C.C.A. 316, 319; In re ... Rodgers, 125 F. 169, 60 C.C.A. 567; In re Reynolds ... (D.C.) 127 F. 760, 762; In re Schermerhorn, 145 ... F. 341, 342, 76 C.C.A. 215, 216 ... Any ... willful interference with any of this trust estate, any ... willful attempt to injure it, to withdraw it from the custody ... of the ... ...
  • Dunlop v. Mercer
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Eighth Circuit
    • October 31, 1907
    ... ... time in any public office; and they cite authorities from New ... York, Illinois, and Oregon, which sustain that position ... In re Garcewich (N.Y.) 115 F. 87, 53 C.C.A. 510; ... In re Carpenter (D.C.N.Y.) 125 F. 831; In re ... Galt (D.C. Ill.) 120 F. 443; In re Rodgers ... (Ill.) 125 F. 169, 177, 60 C.C.A. 567; In re ... Rasmussen's Estate (D.C. Or.) 136 F. 704, 706. But ... the general rule and the weight of authority in this country, ... the established rule of property in Minnesota, and the ... established rule in this court are otherwise. Trustees of ... ...
  • Fish v. East
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Tenth Circuit
    • September 4, 1940
    ...Mueller v. Nugent, 184 U.S. 1, 22 S.Ct. 269, 46 L.Ed. 405; International Bank v. Sherman, 101 U.S. 403, 406, 25 L. Ed. 866; In re Rodgers, 7 Cir., 125 F. 169. Admission of jurisdiction in legal effect admits possession, the Placers Company not claiming ownership or possession of anything bu......
  • Yegen v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.
    • United States
    • North Dakota Supreme Court
    • April 14, 1909
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT