In re Roper

Decision Date10 November 2020
Docket NumberBankruptcy Case No. 15-16638 EEB
Parties IN RE: Nancy Josephine ROPER, Debtor.
CourtU.S. Bankruptcy Court — District of Colorado

Daniel T. Birney, Denver, CO, for Debtor.

ORDER REGARDING DEBTOR'S ELIGIBILITY FOR DISCHARGE UNDER 11 U.S.C. § 1328(a)

Elizabeth E. Brown, Bankruptcy Judge

THIS MATTER comes before the Court on the Debtor's Certification to Obtain Discharge, the Trustee's Statement Regarding Debtor's Eligibility for Discharge (the "Statement"), the Response to Notice of Final Cure Payment ("Response") filed by Westerra Federal Credit Union ("Westerra"), and the Trustee's brief in support of Debtor's discharge. At issue is whether the Debtor is entitled to a discharge when she has not paid all assessed, postpetition charges on her mortgage loan.

In order to obtain a chapter 13 discharge under 11 U.S.C. § 1328(a), a debtor must complete all payments and any other requirements of her confirmed plan. In In re Hoyt-Kieckhaben , 546 B.R. 868, 874 (Bankr. D. Colo. 2016), this Court ruled that this includes not only the payments to the trustee but also the regular, postpetition payments a debtor makes directly to a creditor if the debtor's plan obligated the debtor to make those payments. In this way, the confirmed plan, as it may be amended from time to time, is a binding contract between a debtor and her creditors. If she wants to obtain a chapter 13 discharge, the debtor must fulfill all her plan obligations.

Here, the Statement and the Response indicate that the Debtor made all the trustee payments and all the postpetition direct mortgage payments,1 but she did not pay $1,370 in fees required by the underlying mortgage agreement. According to the Court's record, Westerra gave notice of additional fees totaling $1,470 in 2015. The Debtor did not contest this amount by the deadline set forth in Fed. Bankr. R. 3002.1(e). Nor did she modify her plan to include these fees.

Resolution of this matter requires the Court to analyze the interplay between Rule 3002.1 and §§ 1322(b)(5) and 1328. Congress adopted Rule 3002.1 in 2011 and later amended it in 2016 and 2018. Its stated purpose was to "aid in the implementation of § 1322(b)(5), which permits a chapter 13 debtor to cure a default and maintain payments of a home mortgage over the course of the debtor's plan." Fed. R. Bankr. P. 3002.1 advisory committee's note to 2011 adoption. It fosters this goal by requiring the secured creditor to give notice to the debtor of any interest rate or escrow changes and the assessment of any additional fees, expenses, or other charges that may accrue on a debt secured against her home. If the creditor gives notice and the debtor either pays the additional amounts or obtains a ruling that they are not validly assessed, then she will exit chapter 13 assured that she is current on this debt. The rule does not allow the secured creditor to silently accrue additional amounts and then spring a "gotcha" foreclosure after the debtor has completed her plan and emerged from bankruptcy protection.

The rule sets forth procedures and several deadlines to accomplish its mission. The secured creditor is required to give timely notice of any loan changes or assessed charges. If the change is to the interest rate or escrow amounts, the creditor must notify the debtor no later than twenty-one days before the new payment amount is due. Rule 3002.1(b). If it involves an additional charge, such as a late charge or attorney fees, then the creditor must give notice within 180 days after the creditor has incurred the charge. Rule 3002.1(c). If the debtor disputes any of the additional charges, she has only one year in which to request a court ruling on them. Rule 3002.1(e).

The rule does not specify any deadline by which the debtor must pay the additional interest or charges. Nor does it specify any consequences for the debtor's failure to pay. Instead it sets up an additional procedure at the end of the plan. Within thirty days after the end of the plan, the trustee must give...

To continue reading

Request your trial
7 cases
  • In re Dewitt
    • United States
    • U.S. Bankruptcy Court — Southern District of Ohio
    • May 19, 2023
    ... ... courts have relied on the broader grant of authority in ... subsection (i)(2) to expand evidence exclusion of an ... undisclosed charge to any proceeding, including those outside ... the bankruptcy case. Id. at 463; see also In re ... Roper , 621 B.R. 899, 903 (Bankr. D. Colo. 2020) (noting ... that additional charges properly disclosed to a debtor during ... a bankruptcy case remain due and are not included in the ... general discharge). As another bankruptcy court explained, ... "[t]he remedy authorized by ... ...
  • In re Dewitt
    • United States
    • U.S. Bankruptcy Court — Southern District of Ohio
    • September 30, 2022
    ...a chapter 13 debtor to cure a default and maintain payments of a home mortgage over the course of the debtor's plan." In re Roper , 621 B.R. 899, 902 (Bankr. D. Colo. 2020) (quoting Fed. R. Bankr. P. 3002 -1 advisory committee's note to the 2011 adoption). Rule 3002.1 "does not allow the se......
  • White v. Newrez LLC (In re White)
    • United States
    • U.S. Bankruptcy Court — Southern District of Georgia
    • July 19, 2022
    ...then spring a ‘gotcha’ foreclosure after the debtor has completed her plan and emerged from bankruptcy protection." In re Roper , 621 B.R. 899, 902 (Bankr. D. Colo. 2020).4 To remedy this problem, the Judicial Conference recommended, and the Supreme Court promulgated, Bankruptcy Rule 3002.1......
  • In re Dewitt
    • United States
    • U.S. Bankruptcy Court — Southern District of Ohio
    • September 29, 2022
    ... ... Congress adopted Rule 3002.1. The rule exists to "aid in ... the implementation of § 1322(b)(5), which permits a ... chapter 13 debtor to cure a default and maintain payments of ... a home mortgage over the course of the debtor's ... plan." In re Roper , 621 B.R. 899, 902 (Bankr ... D. Colo. 2020) (quoting Fed.R.Bankr.P. 3002-1 advisory ... committee's note to the 2011 adoption). Rule 3002.1 ... "does not allow the secured creditor to silently accrue ... additional amounts and then spring a 'gotcha' ... foreclosure ... ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
  • Big Banks & Small Consequences in Chapter 13
    • United States
    • Emory University School of Law Emory Bankruptcy Developments Journal No. 39-3, September 2023
    • Invalid date
    ...1. See, e.g., Blanco v. Bayview Loan Servicing, LLC (In re Blanco), 633 B.R. 714 (Bankr. S.D. Tex. 2021).2. See In re Roper, 621 B.R. 899, 902 (Bankr. D. Colo. 2020) ("The rule does not allow the secured creditor to silently accrue additional amounts and then spring a 'gotcha' foreclosure a......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT