In re Salem Suede, Inc.
Decision Date | 24 June 1998 |
Docket Number | Civ.A. No. 97-12587-REK to 97-12590-REK.,No. 96-13184-JNF,Adversary No. 96-1298,96-13184-JNF |
Parties | In re SALEM SUEDE, INC., Debtor. FOREIGN CAR CENTER, INC., Stefano Picciotto, Judith Picciotto, Juan B. Nunez, and Jose B. Ferreras, Plaintiffs, v. SALEM SUEDE, INC., Zion Realty Corporation, The Travelers Insurance Company, and The Travelers Indemnity Company, Defendants. SALEM SUEDE, INC., Appellant, v. TRAVELERS INDEMNITY CO., Appellee. In re ZION REALTY CORPORATION, Debtor. FOREIGN CAR CENTER, INC., Stefano Picciotto, Judith Picciotto, Juan B. Nunez, and Jose B. Ferreras, Plaintiffs, v. The TRAVELERS INSURANCE COMPANY, Salem Suede, Inc., and Zion Realty Corporation, Defendants. The TRAVELERS INDEMNITY COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. SALEM SUEDE, INC., and Zion Realty Corporation, Cross-Claim Defendants and Cross-Claim Plaintiffs. ZION REALTY CORPORATION, Appellant, v. TRAVELERS INDEMNITY CO., Appellee. In re SALEM SUEDE, INC., Debtor. FOREIGN CAR CENTER, INC., Stefano Picciotto, Judith Picciotto, Juan B. Nunez, and Jose B. Ferreras, Plaintiffs, v. The TRAVELERS INDEMNITY COMPANY, Salem Suede, Inc., and Zion Realty Corporation, Defendants. TRAVELERS INDEMNITY CO., Appellant, v. FOREIGN CAR CENTER, INC., Stefano Picciotto, Judith Picciotto, Juan Nunez, and Jose Ferreras, Appellees. IN RE SALEM SUEDE, INC., Debtor. FOREIGN CAR CENTER, INC., Stefano Picciotto, Judith Picciotto, and Juan B. Nunez, Plaintiffs, v. The TRAVELERS INSURANCE COMPANY, Salem Suede, Inc., and Zion Realty Corporation, Defendants. The TRAVELERS INDEMNITY COMPANY, Cross-Claimant and Cross-Claim Defendant, v. SALEM SUEDE, INC., and Zion Realty Corporation, Cross-Claim Defendants and Cross-Claimant. 587*587 Stefano PICCIOTTO, Judith Picciotto, Foreign Car Center, Inc., and Juan Nunez, Appellants, v. TRAVELERS INDEMNITY CO., Appellee. |
Court | U.S. District Court — District of Massachusetts |
COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED
Stephen F. Gordon, Gordon & Wise, Boston, MA, for Salem Suede, Inc.
Frank J. Ciano, Cambridge, MA, Amy J. Rosengarten, Law Office of Frank J. Ciano, Cambridge, MA, Stephen F. Gordon, Gordon & Wise, Boston, MA, for Salem Suede, Inc.
Mary A. Dowd, M. Ellen Carpenter, Kern, Hagerty, Roach & Carpenter, Boston, MA, for Zion Realty Corporation Consolidated.
Timothy M. Hughes, Shafner, Gilleran & Mortensen, P.C., Edwin A. McCabe, Philip Y. Brown, Larry R. Tipton, McCabe Brown, Joel Z. Eigerman, Roche, Carens & DeGiacomo, P.C., Michael C. Gilleran, Pepe & Hazard, L.L.P., Boston, MA, for Foreign Car
Center, Inc., Stefano Picciotto, Judith Picciotto and Juan Nunez.
Timothy M. Hughes, Shafner, Gilleran & Mortensen, Joel Z. Eigerman, Roche, Carens & DeGiacomo, P.C., Michael C. Gilleran, Pepe & Hazard, L.L.P., Boston, MA, for Jose Ferreras.
John A. Nadas, Choate, Hall & Stewart, Boston, MA, for Travelers Indemnity Co.
This consolidated proceeding in the district court in relation to bankruptcy matters presents issues regarding the effect of purported notices of interlocutory appeal and various requests for leave to proceed on interlocutory appeal from different orders of the bankruptcy court in the adversary proceeding identified in the various parts of the caption, above. In this court, the attempted appeals have been consolidated because some of them, at least, and perhaps all of them, present "similar issues from a common record" in bankruptcy, as that phrase is used in D.Mass.L.R. 203(E).
For reasons explained in this Opinion, the bankruptcy court was correct in denying summary judgment, but this court's reasoning is somewhat different and leads also to disposition of all of these consolidated appeals, except that of Travelers, by denial of leave for interlocutory appeal. Travelers' appeal succeeds in part in that, even though affirming the denial of Travelers' motion for summary judgment, this court does so on reasoning different from that of the bankruptcy court. This court also vacates the bankruptcy court's "conclusive determinations" with respect to claims asserted against Travelers under Mass.Gen.L. chs. 93A and 176D, and remands the case to the bankruptcy court for disposition of those claims in a manner consistent with this opinion.
The consolidated appeals arise from the following sequence of events and rulings:
EXCLUSIONS — This insurance does not apply:
To continue reading
Request your trial