In re San Juan, Puerto Rico Air Crash Disaster, 47.

Decision Date06 August 1970
Docket NumberNo. 47.,47.
Citation316 F. Supp. 981
PartiesIn re SAN JUAN, PUERTO RICO AIR CRASH DISASTER Litigation.
CourtJudicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation

Before ALFRED P. MURRAH, Chairman, and JOHN MINOR WISDOM, EDWARD WEINFELD, EDWIN A. ROBSON, WILLIAM H. BECKER, JOSEPH S. LORD, III, and STANLEY A. WEIGEL*, Judges of the Panel.

OPINION AND ORDER

PER CURIAM.

On April 30, 1970, the United States filed a motion to transfer certain actions in which it was a defendant to the District of Puerto Rico for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings under 28 U.S.C. § 1407. Puerto Rican International Airlines (PRINAIR) then requested that several additional actions in which the United States was not a party also be considered for transfer under section 1407. A total of 27 actions are now pending in five different district courts. See Schedule A. All arise from the Puerto Rican International Airlines crash near San Juan, Puerto Rico, on March 5, 1969 in which twenty persons were killed.

All parties agree that the transfer of these actions to the District of Puerto Rico for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings will promote the just and efficient conduct of this litigation and will serve the convenience of the parties and their witnesses. We are satisfied that there are substantial common questions of fact relating to the cause of the crash to justify the transfer of all related actions to the District of Puerto Rico under Section 1407.

Certain plaintiffs urge that these proceedings be limited to discovery relating to liability and that issues relating to damages be left to the transferor courts. We will not so restrict the transferee judge for we think it more conducive to effective judicial management to allow him to determine which issues are appropriate for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings and which should be reserved for further proceedings following remand.1

One of the plaintiffs, while favoring transfer under 1407, makes the unusual request that we provide in our order "for the payment by the United States Government of the necessary travel expenses incurred by counsel * * * in connection with pretrial discovery proceedings". Counsel for the plaintiff conceded at oral argument that in the absence of transfer he would undoubtedly be required to travel to Puerto Rico for depositions and other discovery in order to properly prepare his case for trial. It would seem then that his real concern is the possibility that frequent trips to Puerto Rico could be required for motion practice, pretrial conferences and other matters which would not be necessary if the actions are not transferred. Although we share counsels' concern over the high cost of travel to Puerto Rico, we are confident that pretrial proceedings will be scheduled and conducted so that such trips will be kept to the minimum necessary for the proper conduct of this multidistrict litigation.2

Due to the already heavy docket in the District of Puerto Rico and the declared preference of both judges of that district not to participate in this litigation to avoid any possible conflict of interest, we have found it necessary to make arrangements for an outside judge to conduct these pretrial proceedings. With the typically fine cooperation of all involved, Judge Edward Weinfeld of the Southern District of New York has been temporarily designated to serve in the District of Puerto Rico for the purpose of conducting coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings in this multidistrict litigation.3

It is therefore ordered that the actions listed on Schedule A pending in other districts be and they are hereby transferred to the District of Puerto Rico and with the written consent of that court all related actions are assigned to the Honorable Edward Weinfeld for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings under section 1407.

                                                 SCHEDULE A
                                        Southern District of New York
                Great American Insurance Co., etc. v. United States         Civil Action
                of America                                                  No. 70 Civ 1008
                                        Eastern District of Pennsylvania
                Donna Marie Jafolla, etc. v. United States of America       Civil Action
                                                                            No. 70-608
                                        Middle District of Pennsylvania
                Michael J. Hudacek, etc. v. United States of America        Civil Action
                                                                            No. 70-55
                Michael J. Hudacek, etc. v. United States of America        Civil Action
                                                                            No. 70-56
                First National Bank of Wilkes-Barre, Pa. v. United          Civil Action
                States of America                                           No. 70-59
                First National Bank of Wilkes-Barre, Pa. v. United          Civil Action
                States of America                                           No. 70-60
                Michael J. Hudacek, etc. v. Puerto Rico International       Civil Action
                Airlines, Inc., et al.                                      No. 70-57
                Michael J. Hudacek, etc. v. Puerto Rico International       Civil Action
                Airlines, Inc., et al.                                      No. 70-58
                First National Bank of Wilkes-Barre, Pa. v. Puerto          Civil Action
                Rico International Airlines, Inc., et al.                   No. 70-61
                First National Bank of Wilkes-Barre, Pa. v. Puerto
...

To continue reading

Request your trial
8 cases
  • In re Puerto Rico Air Disaster Litigation
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — District of Puerto Rico
    • March 7, 1972
    ...as a shell to protect the name when Union acquired the capital stock of the operating company. 4 In re San Juan, Puerto Rico Air Crash Disaster, 316 F.Supp. 981 (J.P.M.L. 1970). 5 After the defendant challenged service of process, the plaintiffs, in an effort to cure the alleged initial imp......
  • In re Air Crash Disaster Near Chicago, Etc.
    • United States
    • Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation
    • August 13, 1979
    ...Section 1407. See In re Anthracite Coal Antitrust Litigation, supra, 436 F.Supp. at 403; In re San Juan, Puerto Rico, Air Crash Disaster Litigation, 316 F.Supp. 981, 982 (Jud.Pan.Mult.Lit.1970). See also In re Government Auto Fleet Sales Antitrust Litigation, 328 F.Supp. 218, 219-20 (Jud. 5......
  • IN RE AIRCRASH NEAR DUARTE, CALIFORNIA, ON JUNE 6, 1971
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Central District of California
    • March 19, 1973
    ...on separate issues is appropriate for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings. See, In re San Juan, Puerto Rico Air Crash Disaster, 316 F.Supp. 981 (Jud. Pan.Mult.Lit., 1970)." The Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation then ordered all the cases then pending in this District, ......
  • IN RE AIR CRASH NEAR DENVER, COLORADO ON OCTOBER 3, 1969
    • United States
    • Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation
    • February 29, 1972
    ...In re Air Disaster at San Antonio, Venezuela, 331 F.Supp. 547 (Jud.Pan.Mult. Lit.1971); In re San Juan, Puerto Rico Air Crash Disaster, 316 F.Supp. 981 (Jud.Pan.Mult.Lit.1970); In re Mid-Air Collision near Fairland, Indiana, 309 F.Supp. 621 (Jud.Pan.Mult.Lit.1970). Several plaintiffs and de......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
  • Chapter § 4.04 Factors for Granting a Section 1407 Transfer
    • United States
    • Full Court Press Emerging Trends in Litigation Management Chapter 4
    • Invalid date
    ...In re Gadolinium-Based Contrast Agents, 341 F. Supp. 3d at 1382.[39] See, e.g., In re San Juan, Puerto Rico Air Crash Disaster Litig., 316 F. Supp. 981 (J.P.M.L. 1970). But cf., In re Denture Cream Prods. Liability Litig., 624 F. Supp. 2d 1379 (J.P.M.L. 2009) (transfer of actions does not r......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT