In re Sawyer, No. 2015–0748

Decision Date30 June 2017
Docket Number No. 2015–0748
Citation170 N.H. 197,167 A.3d 622
Parties PETITION OF Wayne SAWYER (New Hampshire Department of Health and Human Services )
CourtNew Hampshire Supreme Court

Disability Rights Center–NH, Inc., of Concord (Aaron Ginsberg on the brief and orally), for the petitioner.

Law Office of Joshua L. Gordon, of Concord (Joshua L. Gordon on the brief and orally), for the respondent.

BASSETT, J.

The petitioner, Wayne Sawyer, has a developmental disability and a history of mental illness. He currently receives state-administered developmental and mental health services and lives at the Laconia Designated Receiving Facility (Laconia DRF), a state-operated facility in Laconia. Prior to his move to Laconia DRF, the petitioner requested that his area agency affiliation for developmental services be changed to the respondent, Lakes Region Community Services (LRCS), the area agency serving Laconia. LRCS denied his request. The petitioner appealed to the Administrative Appeals Unit (AAU) of the New Hampshire Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS). The AAU affirmed, finding that the petitioner failed to prove that his move to Laconia DRF constituted a change in legal residence.

The petitioner challenges the AAU decision and has petitioned for a writ of certiorari. See Sup. Ct. R. 11. We reverse.

I. Overview of Developmental and Mental Health Services Systems

We begin with an overview of the two statutory frameworks under which the petitioner receives developmental and mental health services. DHHS is responsible for establishing, maintaining, and coordinating a "comprehensive service delivery system for developmentally disabled persons," known as the developmental services system, RSA 171–A:1 Introductory Language (2014), and a "comprehensive, effective and efficient system of services for persons with mental illness," known as the mental health services system, RSA 135–C:1, I (2015). Although DHHS coordinates both systems statewide, each is governed by distinct statutory and regulatory schemes.

A. Developmental Services

DHHS administers the developmental services system pursuant to RSA chapter 171–A. RSA 171–A:4 (2014). The policy underlying the developmental services system is that persons with developmental disabilities and their families be provided with services "that emphasize community living," RSA 171–A:1 Introductory Language, that are "based on individual choice," RSA 171–A:1, V (2014), and that allow them an opportunity to participate in decision-making, RSA 171–A:1, I (2014). An individual's participation in the developmental services system may be voluntary or involuntary. See RSA 171–A:5 (2014). Participation is voluntary unless the individual is involuntarily admitted pursuant to RSA chapter 171–B (2014). RSA 171–A:5, I–II. Persons voluntarily participating in the system have certain statutory and regulatory rights, see RSA 171–A:14 (2014), and may, at any time, "seek a change in services or withdraw entirely from the service delivery system," RSA 171–A:7 (2014); see also N.H. Admin. R., He–M 310.

To receive voluntary developmental services, an individual must apply through the area agency serving his or her region. See RSA 171–A:6, I (2014); N.H. Admin. R., He–M 503.04(b). The state is divided into ten regions, with one area agency serving each region. N.H. Admin. R., He–M 505.04. Area agencies are the primary recipients of funds dispensed by DHHS for use in administering developmental services and programs, and as such, serve as the nucleus of services for individuals living in each service region. See RSA 171–A:18, I (2014); N.H. Admin. R., He–M 505.03(a)(b). Individuals can change their area agency affiliation to an area agency in a different region if they "plan[ ] to relocate where [they] live[ ]" to that region. N.H. Admin. R., He–M 503.14(a). Area agencies are responsible for, among other things, screening for eligibility, identifying appropriate services, and developing and reviewing service agreements. See RSA 171–A:6, II (2014); RSA 171–A:18, I; N.H. Admin. R., He–M 505.03. In addition to the basic developmental services provided by regional area agencies, individuals may also receive developmental services through a variety of other programs or institutions. See, e.g., N.H. Admin. R., He–M 507 (community participation services), He–M 524 (in-home services), He–M 1001 (community residences).

B. Mental Health Services

DHHS administers the mental health services system pursuant to RSA chapter 135–C. See RSA 135–C:5, I (2015). The purpose of the mental health services system is to provide mentally disabled individuals "adequate and humane care which, to the extent possible," is "[w]ithin each person's own community," "[l]east restrictive of the person's freedom of movement and ability to function normally in society while being appropriate to the person's individual capacity," and "[d]irected toward eliminating the need for services and promoting the person's independence." RSA 135–C:1, II (2015). Individuals may receive mental health services on a voluntary or involuntary basis. See RSA 135–C:12, I–II (2015); RSA 135–C:20 – :54 (2015 & Supp. 2016). Both classes of admittees have certain statutory and regulatory rights. See RSA 135–C:55 – :60 (2015); N.H. Admin. R., He–M 309, 311.

The mental health services system is also organized regionally, with one designated community mental health program serving each of ten regions. See N.H. Admin. R., He–M 425.03(a)(b). Community mental health programs are tasked with providing, either directly or through a contractual relationship, an array of services to eligible individuals, including intake assessments, case management, medication services, and psychotherapy. RSA 135–C:7 (2015); N.H. Admin. R., He–M 403.06(a). Though mental health services are organized by regional community mental health programs, other facilities, including the New Hampshire Hospital, also deliver mental health services. See, e.g., RSA 135–C:26, I (2015); N.H. Admin. R., He–M 1002 (community residences).

II. Factual Background

The record supports the following facts. The petitioner is an individual with a developmental disability who is eligible to receive developmental services pursuant to RSA chapter 171–A. Prior to 2008, he lived in Concord and received his area agency developmental services through Community Bridges—the area agency serving Concord.

In 2008, after completing a criminal sentence, the petitioner was involuntarily admitted to the mental health services system pursuant to RSA chapter 135–C. He was housed in the Secure Psychiatric Unit (SPU) of the New Hampshire State Prison in Concord during this admission period. In 2009, he entered into a stipulation with the Office of the Attorney General to continue to be subject to involuntary admission. Specifically, the parties stipulated that the petitioner "presents a potentially serious likelihood of significant danger to himself or to others if he is not involuntarily admitted to the SPU for a period of five years, with the possibility of transfer to a less restrictive inpatient facility, and/or conditional discharge as soon as appropriate." The parties further agreed that the petitioner was eligible for developmental services under RSA chapter 171–A and that the Bureau of Developmental Services "shall continue to make best efforts to arrange an appropriate placement for him outside of the [New Hampshire Hospital] and [the] SPU, including coordination with non-State agencies as applicable." Nonetheless, the petitioner remained at the SPU until 2014.

In January 2014, the SPU administrator petitioned to renew the petitioner's involuntary admission under RSA chapter 135–C. The probate court granted this request, extending his involuntary admission for a period not to exceed five years "with a conditional discharge and/or transfer to [Laconia DRF], or other appropriate residential facility that provides the security, staffing, and treatment requirements necessitated by [the petitioner's] mental condition when an appropriate bed is available." Laconia DRF is located within LRCS's service region.

In October 2014, after learning that Laconia DRF soon would have a bed available for him, the petitioner sent a letter to Community Bridges and LRCS notifying them that he would be moving to Laconia to "begin a placement at the Laconia DRF soon" and, consequently, that he "wishe[d] to transfer his area agency services" from Community Bridges to LRCS. LRCS denied this request, stating that "this is clearly a placement and does not meet the criteria for transfer of [a]rea [a]gency services." LRCS further explained that "[s]ince [the petitioner] does not have a discharge plan and/or date, a transfer to LRCS is premature at this time." The petitioner appealed to the AAU.

In April 2015, while his appeal was pending, the petitioner moved to Laconia DRF. Upon moving to Laconia DRF, the petitioner began to receive residential developmental services from Laconia DRF and mental health services from the community mental health program serving Laconia's region. These services are distinct from the area agency developmental services that are the focus of this dispute. At some point between October 2014, when the petitioner requested a change in area agency affiliation, and September 2015, the petitioner stopped receiving area agency services from Concord's Community Bridges and began receiving case management services from the Brain Injury Association. The Brain Injury Association was not a designated area agency during that time period.

Subsequently, the AAU affirmed LRCS's decision to deny area agency services. It characterized the petitioner's move to Laconia DRF as an "institutional transfer" or "legal placement," not a conditional discharge or "voluntary relocation." (Quotations omitted.) Consequently, it concluded that the petitioner's move did not constitute a change in legal residence to Laconia,...

To continue reading

Request your trial
8 cases
  • Doe v. Comm'r of the N.H. Dep't of Health & Human Servs.
    • United States
    • New Hampshire Supreme Court
    • May 11, 2021
    ...services for persons with mental illness," RSA 135-C:1, I(a) (2015), "known as the mental health services system," Petition of Sawyer, 170 N.H. 197, 199, 167 A.3d 622 (2017). See RSA 135-C:3 (2015). The defendant supervises, and DHHS administers, the state mental health services system. Id.......
  • Taranov v. Area Agency of Greater Nashua
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — District of New Hampshire
    • February 1, 2023
    ... ... services for individuals living in each service ... region.” Petition of Sawyer, 170 N.H. 197, 199 ... (2017). The state, however, remains involved in the operation ... of the ABD Waiver program and retains ... ...
  • Doe v. Comm'r, N.H. Dep't of Health & Human Servs.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — District of New Hampshire
    • April 30, 2020
    ...emotional, and behavioral disabilities.(c) Prevent mentally ill persons from harming themselves or others.RSA 235-C:1, I; Petition of Sawyer, 170 N.H. 197, 200 (2017). DHHS is required to "establish, maintain, implement, and coordinate a system of mental health services under [RSA chapter13......
  • Girard v. Town of Plymouth
    • United States
    • New Hampshire Supreme Court
    • August 30, 2019
    ...governing the planning board's decision. We review the interpretation of statutes and regulations de novo, Petition of Sawyer, 170 N.H. 197, 203, 167 A.3d 622 (2017), and, accordingly, we are not bound by the interpretation of the planning board, Trustees of Dartmouth Coll., 171 N.H. at 508......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT