In re Schenk's Estate
Decision Date | 21 January 1919 |
Docket Number | 3282 |
Parties | In re SCHENK'S ESTATE |
Court | Utah Supreme Court |
Rehearing Denied February 11, 1919.
Appeal from the District Court of Cache County, First District; Hon J. D. Call, Judge.
In the matter of the estate of Samuel Schenk, deceased. On petition of testator's widow for summary administration of the estate, praying the same to be set apart to her as a homestead right after payment of the debts and expenses of administration.
From judgment denying her application, and dismissing the petition, the widow appeals.
AFFIRMED.
George Q. Rich for appellant.
C. W Dunn and Walters & Harris for respondent.
OPINION
Samuel Schenk, of Providence, Utah, died in June, 1901, leaving a widow surviving him, and also several adult children by a former marriage. By last will and testament he gave all his personal property to his wife, and all his real property to her for her use and benefit during her life "but not to sell or dispose of."
The widow resided upon the property and used the same for her support until 1916, when she presented the will for probate. The will was duly admitted, and John Schenk, son of the deceased, was appointed executor according to the terms of the will.
In due course of administration an inventory was filed showing the estate to consist of a small house and lot in Providence and about two acres of farming land in the immediate vicinity--all of the value of $ 1,650. Upon application of the widow a temporary allowance was made for her support until the further order of the court. The estate was all sold to pay this allowance and other expenses, and a final account was rendered showing a balance in the hands of the executor in the sum of $ 1,079.41. The executor then filed a petition for final distribution of the estate, detailing the material facts in such cases, among other things setting out the provisions of the will, and that the widow had renounced the same and was therefore entitled to have one-third in value of the residue of the estate distributed to her under the law of succession. The petition alleged that the other devisees under the will should have distributed to them the remainder of the estate. The widow, answering said petition, denied that the other devisees were entitled to any of the property, alleging that it was homestead property, and that she, under the provisions of Comp. Laws Utah 1907, sections 2829, 3847, was entitled to all the residue of the estate. She also represented that she was the surviving widow of the deceased, seventy-four years of age, in declining health, and had no separate property for her support and maintenance; that she had never accepted the provisions of the will made in her favor, excepting the use of the property, until it was taken into possession by the executor, said property all being exempt from execution. The widow, at the same time, filed a formal petition praying for the summary administration of the estate, and that the same be set apart to her as a homestead right, after payment of the debts and expenses of administration.
The facts as to the widow's pecuniary and physical condition and the condition of the estate, as alleged, were all admitted by the executor, and were so found by the court. It also found that she needed all of the estate for her support, but, as conclusions of law, the court found it had no authority, under the sections of the statutes referred to, especially in view of the terminal sentences thereof, to make a summary distribution of the estate or to set it apart as a homestead as prayed for in the petition, as against the provisions of the will, and ordered that the application be denied and the petition dismissed. The widow appealed and assigned as error these rulings of the court.
The conclusions of the court were based upon the fact that the widow by not accepting the provisions of the will, as provided in section 2827 of the laws above referred to, was conclusively presumed to have renounced such provisions and to have accepted her distributive share, as provided in section 2826, which amounted to only one-third of the value of the property. In order to determine the questions submitted for our decision it is convenient at this point to set out in full the several sections of the Complied Laws, above referred to, which, in our judgment, are controlling:
2731. "Every person over the age of eighteen years, of sound mind, may, by last will, dispose of all his estate, real and personal, and such estate not disposed of by will is succeeded to as provided in chapter 4 of this title, being chargeable in both cases with the payment of all the decedent's debts as provided by law: Provided, that a married man shall not devise away from his wife more than two-thirds in value of his legal or equitable estates in real property without her consent in writing."
2826.
2827.
2829. (Italics ours.)
3847. (Italics ours.)
We have italicized those portions of the sections quoted which have a direct bearing upon the issues presented here and to...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Norville v. State Tax Commission
...of the sister state is presumed to prevail. New York Jobbing House v. Sterling Fire Ins. Co., 54 Utah 394, 182 P. 361; In re Schenk's Estate, 53 Utah 381, 178 P. 344; Lukich v. Utah Construction Co., 48 452, 160 P. 270; In re Raleigh's Estate, 48 Utah 128, 158 P. 705. The doctrine that taxi......
-
Zuniga v. Evans
...however, that this section shall not be construed to prevent the disposition by will of the homestead. Id., § 640. In the case of In re Schenk's Estate, supra, this was called upon to apply section 6409, but under a different number, to a situation where a deceased husband had disposed of t......
-
Jackson Land & Livestock Co. v. State Tax Commission
...of the sister state is presumed to prevail. New York Jobbing House v. Sterling Fire Ins. Co., 54 Utah 394, 182 P. 361; In re Schenk's Estate, 53 Utah 381, 178 P. 344; Lukich v. Utah Construction Co., 48 Utah 452, 160 P. 270; In re Raleigh's Estate, 48 Utah 128, 158 P. See also Union Portlan......
-
Fuller-Toponce Truck Co. v. Public Service Commission (Utah Citizens Rate Ass'n, Intervener)
... ... the assumption that the order is affirmed." ... In the ... case of In re Raleigh's Estate, 48 Utah 128, 158 ... P. 705, we stated the general rule that where statutes of ... other states are adopted, it is assumed that the construction ... ...