In re Simpson
Citation | 93 N.W. 918,11 N.D. 526 |
Decision Date | 09 March 1903 |
Docket Number | 6731 |
Parties | IN RE SIMPSON |
Court | United States State Supreme Court of North Dakota |
In the matter of Leslie A. Simpson. Motion to reinstate attorney. Granted.
Order entered that the said Leslie A. Simpson be readmitted to practice law in all the courts of this state upon taking the oath of office.
YOUNG C. J. MORGAN, J., concurs. COCHRANE, J., not participating.
On the 1st day of September, 1902, term of this court, a motion was made by Honorable Tracy R. Bangs and Honorable John M Cochrane for the reinstatement of Leslie A. Simpson, who was disbarred for unprofessional conduct by an order of this court dated July 12, 1900. The disbarment proceedings are reported in 9 N.D. 379, 83 N.W. 541. A similar motion for reinstatement was made at the September, 1901, term of court and was denied. On the former motion no proof which we could judicially consider was offered, either to contradict or to excuse the unprofessional acts upon which the order of disbarment was based, or to show that the applicant for reinstatement had so altered in character, as a result of the discipline to which he had been subjected, as to render him fit to be intrusted with the privileges pertaining to the office of attorney and counselor at law of this state. The court, however, while denying the motion, at the same term in a communication from Chief Justice Wallin, directed to the Honorable Seth Newman, president of the State Bar Association, referred the application to said association, and requested that body to conduct an investigation, through its proper officers, touching the present character and fitness of Mr. Simpson to be reinstated, and to report to this court upon the following matters of fact: The committee of the bar association charged with the duty of conducting the investigation was composed of the Honorable Roderick Rose, the Honorable Charles F. Templeton, and the Honorable P. H. Rourke. This committee convened at Dickinson, in Stark county, where the applicant resides, and, upon notice to the attorneys who appeared in the original proceedings, heard and received all evidence offered; and the same, which was reduced to writing and verified by the witnesses, is contained in the report filed in this court. The committee's report is as follows: ...
To continue reading
Request your trial