In re Statehouse Bonds

Citation19 R.I. 393,33 A. 870
PartiesIn re STATEHOUSE BONDS.
Decision Date21 January 1896
CourtRhode Island Supreme Court

Communication by the governor to the supreme court in the matter of the statehouse bonds.

To His Excellency, Charles Warren Lippitt, Governor of the State of Rhode Island and Providence Plantations:

We have received from your excellency a communication requesting our opinion on the following questions:

First. Authority to issue statehouse bonds to the extent of $1,500,000 was voted by the electors on November 8, 1802. By chapter 1201 of the Public Laws, passed May 24, 1893, said bonds were finally authorized. The proceeds of said bonds have been deposited in bank by the general treasurer, and interest is being allowed upon the same. The statehouse commission will probably not use, for any purposes connected with the statehouse, during the first eight months of 1896, more than $650,000. In such circumstances, can the general treasurer legally and properly use any portion of the proceeds of said statehouse bonds to pay the general expenses of the state during the first eight months of 1896, until the regular income of the state, to be received during said eight months, places the state in a position to return said money with interest to said statehouse fund?

Second. In case none of the general officers of the state have, at present, the necessary power, can the legislature, which meets January 21, 1896, authorize such temporary use of a portion of the proceeds of the said Statehouse bonds to defray the general expenses of the state as stated above?

Third. In case the proper authorities should determine to issue bonds to provide funds to pay for the land required for, and the cost of erecting, the Rhode Island State Normal School and the proposed state armory in the city of Providence, can provision be made, in the acts authorizing said bonds, to repay into the general treasury of the state such sums of money as have already been appropriated by the legislature, and expended by the Rhode Island normal school commission and the commission to erect a state armory in the city of Providence, for the purposes contemplated in the acts creating such commissions?

Fourth. Has the legislature power to authorize said repayment from the proceeds of said normal school and said state armory bonds, or must the intention to make said repayment be specified in the act, creating said bonds, to be submitted to the electors?

The proposition submitted to the people, by which...

To continue reading

Request your trial
5 cases
  • H. P. Cornell Co. v. Barber
    • United States
    • Rhode Island Supreme Court
    • July 7, 1910
    ...19 Atl. 1086; Spelling on Extraordinary Relief, § 1434; Ireland v. Hunnel, 90 Iowa, 98, 57 N. W. 715; In re State House Commission and State Auditor, 19 R. I. 393, 35 Atl. 212, infra. But we do not agree with the contention of counsel for relator that the town exceeded its authority in appo......
  • State ex rel. Sathre v. Hopton
    • United States
    • North Dakota Supreme Court
    • February 21, 1936
    ...Board of Commissioners (Kan.) 94 P. 104; Re House Resolution, 26 P. 145, 15 Colo. 602; Fisher v. Steele (La.) 1 So. 882; Re State House Fund, 19 R.I. 393, 35 A. 870. A dedicated by the state constitution to a specific purpose, which fund was determined to contain a surplus over and above th......
  • Jobe v. Caldwell
    • United States
    • Arkansas Supreme Court
    • January 17, 1910
    ...no direction to pay the same from a particular fund, nor any direction to pay at all. Sections 1, 2 and 3 of the act; 36 Mo. 65; Id. 58; 19 R. I. 393. The opinion in Moore v. Alexander is wrong, and should be overruled. It overlooks the fact that the Constitution of 1874 provides two method......
  • State v. Hackmann
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • July 15, 1918
    ...inhibition, several decisions are cited, and, as enforcing the same rule, a clause of the Missouri State Constitution. In re Statehouse Fund, 19 R. I. 393, 33 Atl. 870; Id., 20 R. I. 707, 38 Atl. 927; Graham v. Horton, 6 Kan. 353; Trustees v. Bailey, 10 Fla. 112, 81 Am. Dec. 194; Constituti......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT