In re Swanson, Bankruptcy No. 81-00272-BKC-JAG

Decision Date29 May 1981
Docket NumberAdv. No. 81-0194-BKC-JAG-A.,Bankruptcy No. 81-00272-BKC-JAG
PartiesIn re Donald J. SWANSON, Debtor. Mary Joyce ROGERS, Plaintiff, v. Donald J. SWANSON, Defendant.
CourtUnited States Bankruptcy Courts. Eleventh Circuit. U.S. Bankruptcy Court — Southern District of Florida

Robert A. Plafsky, Ruden, Barnett, (cClosky, Schuster & Russell, Fort Lauderdale, Fla., for plaintiff.

Richard W. Smith, Johnson & Smith, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, Fla., for debtor-defendant.

FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS

JOSEPH A. GASSEN, Bankruptcy Judge.

This action was tried before the court on May 20, 1981 upon Mary Joyce Rogers' adversary complaint against Donald J. Swanson, the debtor, seeking to have a debt to her excepted from discharge. The operative facts and applicable law are as follows.

Mary Joyce Rogers lent Donald J. Swanson $22,500 and as evidence thereof Donald J. Swanson executed and delivered a mortgage note to Mary Joyce Rogers on April 26, 1978. Because the first installment was not due until May 1, 1979, the principal sum of the mortgage note was calculated to include accrued interest for the first year in the amount of $1,800 and therefore the mortgage note reflects a principal sum of $24,300. Prior to executing the mortgage note, Donald J. Swanson represented to Mary Joyce Rogers that the note would be secured by a mortgage deed in recordable form and recorded against the real property known as 2631 Sugarloaf Lane, Fort Lauderdale, Florida and legally described as follows:

Lot 26, of Block Ten of Lauderdale Isle # 2 according to the Plat thereof, recorded in Plat Book, 37, Page 46 of the Public Records of Broward County, Florida.

Simultaneously with the execution of the mortgage note, Donald J. Swanson executed and delivered a mortgage deed to Mary Joyce Rogers but intentionally failed to have his signature on the mortgage deed witnessed and intentionally failed to have the mortgage deed notarized and recorded. At the time Donald J. Swanson entered into this transaction with Mary Joyce Rogers and executed the mortgage note and mortgage deed, he was in a confidential relationship with Mary Joyce Rogers on a personal basis and was a lawyer as well. He did not represent her as a lawyer but offered her much advice. As a lawyer, he knew the significance of not having the mortgage deed witnessed, notarized and recorded, but Mary Joyce Rogers did not fully appreciate the significance of those circumstances and was confused but gullible when Swanson told her she was protected by the mortgage as security...

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT